Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
UAL grapples with F/O's not upgrading to PIC >

UAL grapples with F/O's not upgrading to PIC

Search

Notices

UAL grapples with F/O's not upgrading to PIC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-2023, 11:15 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,954
Default

Originally Posted by 89Pistons
I don't think it's something we offered. It's something the company wanted. Why? Even though they won't immediately reap the benefits from that section.
In the future, pilot bidding behavior won't be as much of a function of section 5 and 20 as a result. Lessening the need for the company to improve upon those sections. They'll just force new hires into them, creating a pseudo up or out for those that get left with no other choice than to take the bid in the drop with all of the strings attached.

Regionals pay direct entry captains 100 G's in bonus money. I have a feeling we gave this to the company for pennies.
Oh it’s definitely something the company wanted, but historically the 5/10/15 year upgrade has been the norm and the company wouldn’t care about offering upgrades to new hires. I firmly believe in 5-10 years that will also be true. Which means we’re selling them this paragraph in the contract for what is likely the highest price we’re going to get.
DarkSideMoon is offline  
Old 07-20-2023, 11:23 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 756 left
Posts: 766
Default

Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
Oh it’s definitely something the company wanted, but historically the 5/10/15 year upgrade has been the norm and the company wouldn’t care about offering upgrades to new hires. I firmly believe in 5-10 years that will also be true. Which means we’re selling them this paragraph in the contract for what is likely the highest price we’re going to get.

Looking forward to seeing the final language. Cashing in chips = giving a concession. Sounds dirty. Like the add pay schemes many of us had problems with in Tumi. Was surprised to see so many schemes show up again. Hopefully we didn't "cash" too many chips. Giving things that will have no chance of getting them back to the table in the future for those of us that will be here past 2028.
89Pistons is offline  
Old 07-20-2023, 11:34 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Position: CAP A320
Posts: 301
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
I've seen a decent amount of commuters picking up with VDOs out of SFO. YMMV.

I have spent most of my career on reserve and frankly, I've read a lot of recommended fixes to reserve. A positive change for some reserves can be a negative for others.
I have no recommendations on how to improve reserve, but I do know that the earlier start time on day 1 in the Tumi was a huge negative. And having seen that may be one reason why many are waiting until they're solid lineholders to bid up.
Another reason why I think we're seeing people slower to bid a higher band is that current pay rates are good enough at the lower end that they'd rather have a higher QOL than a larger paycheck.
It's pretty tough for a reserve to pick up a PP trip. They can't just pick it up. They have to call CS to get it. You might have seen some SFO commuters on VDO get a trip, but that's few and far between at other bases across all fleets. For someone that says they spend a lot of time on reserves, and can't recommend any true reserve fixes, really negates what you have to say, since you apparently don't understand the weakness of being on reserve.

Having more days off is the first thing that needed to be done, so looks like we will have one more day off. Why, because you can now bid all weekends off in a 5 weekend month, which you cannot do now. Plus helps with days of reserve blocks on and still getting more weekends off as a global reserve. This impacts MPG, and in certain months you will get paid 77 hours of MPG, with the higher reserve day pay increased to 4:33? from 4:03:03.

Being able to bid for only long calls is huge. Plus if you do bid for SCs, do voluntary FSB or early starts, you can get much higher MPG that can take you over 80 hours. Plus every unused SC you get credit for.

I'm waiting for the details on exactly how much each month for MPG is but that helps the pay disparity if you can't break minimum. The new reserve rules will help with commuting as well.

I think we have a lot of reasons that someone might bid reserve now.
fanaticalflyer is offline  
Old 07-20-2023, 11:51 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by fanaticalflyer
For someone that says they spend a lot of time on reserves, and can't recommend any true reserve fixes, really negates what you have to say, since you apparently don't understand the weakness of being on reserve.
The reason I say that is because I've read some reserve 'fixes' that I disagreed with, and some of the changes I'd like to see would agitate others. This isn't a one size fits all world.
Yes, reserve sucks. But a lot of fixes I've read are either ones that the company will want givebacks in other areas or are ones that fit for some but not others.

Originally Posted by fanaticalflyer
I think we have a lot of reasons that someone might bid reserve now.
The devil's in the details. We've seen all of the 'good' stuff in the AIP. There will be plenty of less desirable changes when we read the TA.
Andy is offline  
Old 07-20-2023, 12:05 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,954
Default

Originally Posted by 89Pistons
Looking forward to seeing the final language. Cashing in chips = giving a concession. Sounds dirty. Like the add pay schemes many of us had problems with in Tumi. Was surprised to see so many schemes show up again. Hopefully we didn't "cash" too many chips. Giving things that will have no chance of getting them back to the table in the future for those of us that will be here past 2028.
I respect your opinion but to me it’s a concession that will be worthless in 5 years. Might as well squeeze some blood out of that stone now. There will be more chips in the future and the value of the chips both sides hold will also change. Holistically I like the AIP as long as the TA language is good.

And, like a lot of things, whether or not it’s a concession really depends on how you look at it. I’m sure there are new hires that will be thrilled to immediately hold a left seat bid. People willingly take it at Delta.
DarkSideMoon is offline  
Old 07-22-2023, 01:11 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2023
Posts: 114
Default

Originally Posted by 89Pistons
I don't think it's something we offered. It's something the company wanted. Why? Even though they won't immediately reap the benefits from that section.
In the future, pilot bidding behavior won't be as much of a function of section 5 and 20 as a result. Lessening the need for the company to improve upon those sections. They'll just force new hires into them, creating a pseudo up or out for those that get left with no other choice than to take the bid in the drop with all of the strings attached.

Regionals pay direct entry captains 100 G's in bonus money. I have a feeling we gave this to the company for pennies.
I think it's fair to assume that after United Next there won't be another growth spurt... I'll put my money on a light-moderate contraction in 5-10 years. A lot of tunes will change about QoL vs work when that happens. Unfilled Captain vacancies? Fuggediboutit.... noddachance.
AbjectFutility is offline  
Old 07-24-2023, 11:00 PM
  #67  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 12
Default

With the expansion in mind, and the new AIP coming out, what are best guesses for upgrade time moving forward? Where were they at just pre-Covid for NBCA? I realize this is a bit of a “how longs a piece of string” type question! With the expansion happening are they likely to stay under 5 years for a while? Thanks.
Spfh is offline  
Old 07-25-2023, 06:45 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2022
Posts: 856
Default

Likely to stay under 5 years? Yes

Someone is always gonna be on reserve Christmas and holidays and I suspect that position in coastal bases won’t go senior anytime soon

Wouldn’t be surprised at a very steep gradient to the g-line
Brickfire is offline  
Old 07-25-2023, 07:13 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,961
Default

Originally Posted by Spfh
With the expansion in mind, and the new AIP coming out, what are best guesses for upgrade time moving forward? Where were they at just pre-Covid for NBCA? I realize this is a bit of a “how longs a piece of string” type question! With the expansion happening are they likely to stay under 5 years for a while? Thanks.
Final language will drive things, but even with the AIP there hasn’t been much shift in the appeal of being a 737 Captain.

If Kirby wasn’t so cheap and bought more airbuses instead of 73s there probably would be less unfilled CA vacancies, even with UALs **** reserve rules.
Otterbox is offline  
Old 07-25-2023, 07:37 AM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by Brickfire
Likely to stay under 5 years? Yes

Someone is always gonna be on reserve Christmas and holidays and I suspect that position in coastal bases won’t go senior anytime soon

Wouldn’t be surprised at a very steep gradient to the g-line
it’s more than 5 years to the g line today in most bases
TFAYD is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DirectLawOnly
United
45
12-05-2012 05:39 AM
sl0wr0ll3r
United
114
11-22-2010 03:40 PM
LAfrequentflyer
Hangar Talk
2
02-01-2006 05:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices