Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
UAL grapples with F/O's not upgrading to PIC >

UAL grapples with F/O's not upgrading to PIC

Search

Notices

UAL grapples with F/O's not upgrading to PIC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2023, 03:42 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,597
Default

Agreed, the language is not out just yet, so some people are holding off bidding captain today. Agreed there are people waiting for the contract to be signed so they can get positive space, or functional positive space commuting.


We already saw the first wave with the latest snapshot. The next wave will come when the language comes out. The next wave will be when the contract is signed. But like I said, better get your captain bids in. I predict United will be at 0 infilled captain seats by the end of the year.
iahflyr is offline  
Old 07-20-2023, 04:50 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,900
Default

Originally Posted by ClappedOut145
Didn’t the subject of the article take an upgrade on the last vacancy? ORD 737.
Yes, he did. So the subject of the article was being disingenuous and less than fully transparent if interviewed recently or the article has been percolating with the author for over 3 months.
EWRflyr is offline  
Old 07-20-2023, 05:00 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 805
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr
Agreed, the language is not out just yet, so some people are holding off bidding captain today. Agreed there are people waiting for the contract to be signed so they can get positive space, or functional positive space commuting.


We already saw the first wave with the latest snapshot. The next wave will come when the language comes out. The next wave will be when the contract is signed. But like I said, better get your captain bids in. I predict United will be at 0 infilled captain seats by the end of the year.
It will take a year for most of these reserve fixes to implement. The underlying impacts to the amount of premium pay being offered to lineholders will also take awhile to see. If reserves are picking up early morning departures for 1 or 2 hours of add pay vs now where the company has to put 100% premium on every trip before 10am it will be a huge loss to us
Aquaticus is offline  
Old 07-20-2023, 07:02 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 666
Default

Originally Posted by Aquaticus
It will take a year for most of these reserve fixes to implement. The underlying impacts to the amount of premium pay being offered to lineholders will also take awhile to see. If reserves are picking up early morning departures for 1 or 2 hours of add pay vs now where the company has to put 100% premium on every trip before 10am it will be a huge loss to us
I think the company got 1 big win with this contract, reduction in ppu. That was a stated goal, and all these add pay additions I strongly believe will result in ppu reducing substantially. That being said, for many people there are now several new ways to make a little extra. The really senior FOs in new hire categories probably lose the most….like those living in base sfo777fo’s.
webecheck is offline  
Old 07-20-2023, 07:10 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 666
Default

I will add, really thought we would get some amount of commuter hotels. That would solve a lot, and I think companies cost analysis on the impact is simply wrong. There would be far less commuter clause usage because people would commute out early. Sick drops go down. This new SC pick up option I think would get utilized more, and that’s the real ppu killer. Someone wants to fly extra, just finished a trip, legal for the sc tomorrow, why not grab it for what is essentially a day ppu and then still get some sort of extra trip. Or go home with 10:30 for just hanging out in base another day. Have to imagine SFO and EWR would have really benefitted from some commuter hotels but at least the people running to Guam to have a break from their wife get some more coin.
webecheck is offline  
Old 07-20-2023, 07:30 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,360
Default

Originally Posted by webecheck
I will add, really thought we would get some amount of commuter hotels. That would solve a lot, and I think companies cost analysis on the impact is simply wrong. There would be far less commuter clause usage because people would commute out early. Sick drops go down. This new SC pick up option I think would get utilized more, and that’s the real ppu killer. Someone wants to fly extra, just finished a trip, legal for the sc tomorrow, why not grab it for what is essentially a day ppu and then still get some sort of extra trip. Or go home with 10:30 for just hanging out in base another day. Have to imagine SFO and EWR would have really benefitted from some commuter hotels but at least the people running to Guam to have a break from their wife get some more coin.
maybe we will be pleasantly surprised when we see the final contract.
JTwift is offline  
Old 07-20-2023, 07:36 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,597
Default

I’ve never understood company paid commuter hotels. You can usually get a decent hotel for $150/night. Why miss out on a $5-10k+ trip because you aren’t willing to spend $150 on a hotel.

Most pilots I fly with are terrible with finances. This is one example.
iahflyr is offline  
Old 07-20-2023, 07:40 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,157
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr
I’ve never understood company paid commuter hotels. You can usually get a decent hotel for $150/night. Why miss out on a $5-10k+ trip because you aren’t willing to spend $150 on a hotel.

Most pilots I fly with are terrible with finances. This is one example.
lol ok management. “Hurry up and get your upgrade bid in before you miss out on commuting to reserve and buying your own hotels!”
LAXtoDEN is offline  
Old 07-20-2023, 07:46 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 695
Default

Originally Posted by Aquaticus
It will take a year for most of these reserve fixes to implement. The underlying impacts to the amount of premium pay being offered to lineholders will also take awhile to see. If reserves are picking up early morning departures for 1 or 2 hours of add pay vs now where the company has to put 100% premium on every trip before 10am it will be a huge loss to us
Who is the “us” you’re referencing?

So reserve becomes more desirable, goes more senior in some cases, incentivizes upgrades, and this is a huge loss to us?
Chuck D is offline  
Old 07-20-2023, 07:52 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,501
Default

Originally Posted by webecheck
I will add, really thought we would get some amount of commuter hotels. That would solve a lot, and I think companies cost analysis on the impact is simply wrong. There would be far less commuter clause usage because people would commute out early. Sick drops go down. This new SC pick up option I think would get utilized more, and that’s the real ppu killer. Someone wants to fly extra, just finished a trip, legal for the sc tomorrow, why not grab it for what is essentially a day ppu and then still get some sort of extra trip. Or go home with 10:30 for just hanging out in base another day. Have to imagine SFO and EWR would have really benefitted from some commuter hotels but at least the people running to Guam to have a break from their wife get some more coin.
What the last few posts in this vein highlights are that many of the improvements, regardless of TA language will be heavily dependent on the behaviors of crew scheduling and pilots. RIP PPU, particularly for NB CA.
ThumbsUp is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DirectLawOnly
United
45
12-05-2012 05:39 AM
sl0wr0ll3r
United
114
11-22-2010 03:40 PM
LAfrequentflyer
Hangar Talk
2
02-01-2006 05:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices