Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
4th of July meltdown weekend. >

4th of July meltdown weekend.

Search

Notices

4th of July meltdown weekend.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2023, 07:38 PM
  #41  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 27
Default

Anyone wondering if some of this melt-down is due to the shifting of flying from EWR to ( ORD, DEN, IAH, MCO)? Is some of this the chickens coming home to roost? Management pushed EWR flying out into the central hubs to get some NB upgrades, well, they got the upgrades, however, looks like the dominos fall pretty fast when you have to ship in all your crews? 👨‍✈️🤷‍♂️
Lanceair is offline  
Old 06-29-2023, 08:02 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,039
Default

Originally Posted by Lanceair
Anyone wondering if some of this melt-down is due to the shifting of flying from EWR to ( ORD, DEN, IAH, MCO)? Is some of this the chickens coming home to roost? Management pushed EWR flying out into the central hubs to get some NB upgrades, well, they got the upgrades, however, looks like the dominos fall pretty fast when you have to ship in all your crews? 👨‍✈️🤷‍♂️

I personally don’t think so. Management is addicted to EWR like crack. They have IAD right down the road to funnel connecting traffic through but chose to keep EWR at max capacity. At the merger for example we had JFK and EWR. JFK was closed post merger and EWR increased. IAH pre merger flew many more destinations like CDG, had nonstop to SYD post merger etc. ORD was a large 747 and 777 base. Now ORD is a shell with only a few 787s. They’ve streamlined a majority of the traffic through EWR and SFO (one of the fastest shrinking large cities in the USA) and wonder why things go wrong when there is a hiccup. The only mid continent base with more traffic post merger is DEN. EWR has historically been a commuter base. When weather is bad it doesn’t matter what base the crews are attached to, the majority hop a plane to get to work. IAH/DEN and to a smaller degree ORD have a much higher % of peeps simply driving in to start their trips. EWR/PHL/JFK/LGA all are affected with a single large cell. It’s not like having more EWR based pilots mean more locals driving to the airport when things go wrong. If that was the case there wouldn’t be any EWR unfilled CA slots.

I get what you’re saying. IAH is where they’re still able to fill CA slots so they’ve artificially increased it. The issue is still EWR and getting crews in/out IMO
UALinIAH is offline  
Old 06-29-2023, 08:19 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 496
Default

Originally Posted by DoNoHarm
EWR will never be successful as a hub. Just too much traffic from the "real" airports. JFK and LGA will always have the priority. Even HPN has more of a priority with the types of influential people that fly in and out of there.
So the billions Port Authority dumped into Newark term C and now A was just a waste. Cool rant bro. Let’s just rely on Queens instead. Worked out great for Lucchese family…
JurgenKlopp is offline  
Old 06-29-2023, 08:53 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2022
Posts: 240
Default

NYC has been eating airlines alive for decades… JetBlue 15 years or so ago in the winter, DL had some prolific summer NYC cancellation events pre Covid and again last year, and EWR seems to always be on the edge. When the tower closed during the cold snap this past Dec 24, we took it in the shorts then too.

is this meltdown worse than normal or does it feel worse because of the contract situation? Honest question.
three1five is offline  
Old 06-29-2023, 11:22 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 680
Default

Originally Posted by yesto67
no it won’t. the public does not care about our 15 days off and quality of like.
OK….so we just let him spout off misleading info to the public and not challenge him at all on TV? OK got it😵😵
Bahamasflyer is offline  
Old 06-30-2023, 12:28 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2022
Posts: 311
Default

Let me ask the pilot group this:

Would your mindset and/or behavior have been any different during the last 6 days if operating under a new UPA given the same meltdown conditions?
RaginCajun is offline  
Old 06-30-2023, 03:53 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2022
Posts: 148
Default

Originally Posted by WhyIFly
United really had no chance at all of completing their summer schedule. EWR is a dumpster fire of a hub and has very little chance of success. UAL's fleet is really old (over 50% of the airplanes are over 20 years old) and the management/scheduling system is simply not designed for this amount of flying.

It is fun that you are all blaming this on ATC, but the truth is that your management screwed up badly by trying to fly such an aggressive schedule. UAL is getting hammered in what should be the most profitable few weeks in the history of aviation. This disaster is 100% Kirby's fault. There is no way it was ever going to be successful. A good leader would have set a summer schedule that was manageable.
This is not an unfair assessment.
Spartacusbob is offline  
Old 06-30-2023, 06:39 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,725
Default

Originally Posted by JurgenKlopp
Honestly bro how dense are you? The rest of us dues paying members really appreciate your needed internet bravado…


After conducting a hearing, the district court granted United's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining the defendants from “calling, permitting, instigating, authorizing, encouraging, participating in, approving or continuing any interference with United's airline operations, including but not limited to any strike, work stoppage, sick-out, slowdown, work to rule campaign, concerted refusal to accept voluntary or overtime flying assignments, or other concerted refusal to perform normal pilot operations in violation of the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.”  

The court also ordered the defendants to take all reasonable actions within their power to prevent and to refrain from continuing those same actions.   We granted the defendants' motion to expedite the appeal, and we now affirm.
Some of the “hero’s” on here are are more dense than depleted uranium. Having been caught up in the BS this last week, I can say without he slightest hesitation that this I 100% an ATC/United management caused melt down. When my connecting airplane gets to me 5 or 6 hours late because it was hung up in EWR or IAD on a ATC ground stop that’s got nothing to do with me or the rest of the UAL pilot group.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 06-30-2023, 08:54 AM
  #49  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 598
Default

Originally Posted by Bahamasflyer
WHY aren't our union leaders going on TV too to counter Kirby's misleading statements?
Originally Posted by hummingbear
Because when passengers are stranded in Newark for 3 days, they don’t care that airline pilots want more $$$. It all just ends up sounding like chest thumping. Better to make those points directly to management & help them understand how engaged pilots are more likely to step up in moments like this.
Originally Posted by Bahamasflyer
What you say doesnt make sense. We wouldn't be going on TV countering Kirby asking for more $$, we'd be going on in front of the public demanding he take responsibility and how he is to blame for our lack of QOL (Esp extensions into days off) AND for mismanaging the operation just as much as ATC..

Unlike pay demands, that WILL garner sympathy from the public.
UALPA should have a press conference. They don't talk about the contract, they tell the customers that the pilots are working overtime and doing everything they can to help, and that the union doesn't condone management being asleep at the switch. DALPA did this last summer for our meltdown and it got great approval ratings for the customers. All summer long they were cheering us on in our contract fight.
Tropical is offline  
Old 06-30-2023, 09:21 AM
  #50  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 27
Default

Originally Posted by UALinIAH
I personally don’t think so. Management is addicted to EWR like crack. They have IAD right down the road to funnel connecting traffic through but chose to keep EWR at max capacity. At the merger for example we had JFK and EWR. JFK was closed post merger and EWR increased. IAH pre merger flew many more destinations like CDG, had nonstop to SYD post merger etc. ORD was a large 747 and 777 base. Now ORD is a shell with only a few 787s. They’ve streamlined a majority of the traffic through EWR and SFO (one of the fastest shrinking large cities in the USA) and wonder why things go wrong when there is a hiccup. The only mid continent base with more traffic post merger is DEN. EWR has historically been a commuter base. When weather is bad it doesn’t matter what base the crews are attached to, the majority hop a plane to get to work. IAH/DEN and to a smaller degree ORD have a much higher % of peeps simply driving in to start their trips. EWR/PHL/JFK/LGA all are affected with a single large cell. It’s not like having more EWR based pilots mean more locals driving to the airport when things go wrong. If that was the case there wouldn’t be any EWR unfilled CA slots.

I get what you’re saying. IAH is where they’re still able to fill CA slots so they’ve artificially increased it. The issue is still EWR and getting crews in/out IMO
A lot of what you said is true, EWR has always been a **** show, even when properly staffed with pilots, ramp crew and controllers. I think the difference now is that the EWR 737 has shrunk by about 100 crews.(as an example, I cannot speak to the other BES) The domino effect of that is less crews actually on reserve (whether sitting at home or in the crash pad) less crews available to drive in (think 5 hour radius), that gets you Delaware, Northern VA, central PA, Upstate NY, Southern ME to the Cape. Many of the folks in that radius usually commute in on a jet, however, when offered SRM with conflict, it wouldn’t take too much math to figure out a long drive to NJ would be lucrative. When you are artificially pumping crews into EWR to fly the schedule, and the inevitable CF hits, it becomes impossible to recover the operation because all your crews are stuck on the tarmac, waiting in the crew room or searching for hotels.

In another twist of irony, if you look at the NB CA positions across the country, they have all been homogenized, so the historically junior bases, SFO, LAX and EWR, are no longer so junior.

If you remember a couple years ago, it was managements plan to fly Hub flying out the Hub, thus isolating problems in the system and solving IROPs locally, instead of relying on other bases. I think the vacant CA positions blew up that idea, so management had to 180, and search for EWR CAs in MCO, LAS, ORD, IAH and DEN.

Now that management has tried every other way to solve this problem, there is another, rather ONE option left, perhaps the easiest and most logical answer, and now after four straight days of IROP, the most economical answer…💵🫴👨‍✈️😁
Lanceair is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
adamnwiest
Fractional
2204
09-14-2020 01:53 PM
FlightCrewTools
Delta
4
06-18-2018 04:10 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
37
06-18-2009 05:22 PM
UCLAbruins
Fractional
6
01-27-2008 05:13 PM
Baba Bluey
JetBlue
72
12-21-2005 04:47 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices