Search

Notices

NC Update?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2023, 06:00 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Position: 787 FO
Posts: 634
Default

Originally Posted by RaginCajun
compared DALs vacation to our vacation. They get less days off per year, therefore they get paid more for those days vs. us.
Kirby must not think we can multiply and add. In two years DAL vacation will top out at 37 days x 4:35 = 160:25 annual vacation hours. United tops out at 42 days x 3:15 = 136.5 annual hours.
Originally Posted by RaginCajun
The 79 out of 159 work/life rules need to be adjusted in order to be economical for UAL to stay competitive. The ask isn’t economical
United is stacking cash to build the runway longer to ensure furloughs are never a threat.
Complete BS. The cost of the current United offer is well below Delta's contract and does anyone believe the cash is for furlough prevention? UFB.
Originally Posted by RaginCajun
Very concerned with upgrades. Without upgrades we cannot grow. Leaning on the new contract for reprieve.
If only Kirby was this stupid. The reason for the 100+ unfilled Captain slots is the work rules and reserve provisions are so substandard. Nothing like two year Captains and new-hire FOs operating 737NG & 737MAXs all over the northern hemisphere.
Originally Posted by dead meat
The tone was clearly disapproval from the pilot group. Basically group he presented too was 60% NH, 20% instructors & pilots, 20% non pilot TK staff. The 20% instructors & pilots were the most vocal...From my perspective, there really was no other way to interpret it other than in this Q&A Kirby was on the spot. The pilot group was unified in their disappointment.
Originally Posted by Rostov
This sounds like a productive show of disapproval from the pilot group. Bravo!
I agree. Great job folks!
jerryleber is offline  
Old 04-12-2023, 06:41 PM
  #22  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 43
Default

The update from the NC a couple of weeks ago was a breath of fresh air.

To make an informed decision I need to know what our Reps are asking.

Why the "cloak and dagger"? I am a United pilot but I knew Delta's opening details years ago.
xGearSlingerx is offline  
Old 04-13-2023, 04:28 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
Default

Originally Posted by xGearSlingerx
The update from the NC a couple of weeks ago was a breath of fresh air.

To make an informed decision I need to know what our Reps are asking.

Why the "cloak and dagger"? I am a United pilot but I knew Delta's opening details years ago.
Thats always the big question and I have never understood the secrecy. ALPA’s Economic team is very good at costing. If they say the companies offer is below Delta I would believe that. The question is how far below Delta is the offer? 1% or 10%? The next question is how far above Delta is your table position. That’s a very important number that never seems to get published. Keeping in mind that mediation will drive you to the Delta solution plus a % or two deciding to go that route is a tough choice for your negotiating committee given it adds substantial time to the process. Time is not your friend if you are looking at where your career earnings will end up.

In the United case you probably have more leverage than Delta because time is also not on managements side with your training situation. Time however works for management with the substantial sums saved delaying the contract. Full retro never happens in long delayed contracts. You get zero retro on work rules. Delta’s MEC preached that they would NEVER sign a contract without full retro and even wrote it into the union bylaws then caved on the issue for about 30 cents on the dollar.
Delta did have one thing going for them that you don’t at United. A less than smart CEO who went on national TV saying the Delta pilots would never be allowed to strike. The mediator took great offense to that statement. She controlled that issue not EB and threatened a near immediate release to self help if Delta management did not put an offer on the table that could close things out in a week. I doubt SK is as stupid as EB.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 04-13-2023, 05:44 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Thats always the big question and I have never understood the secrecy. ALPA’s Economic team is very good at costing. If they say the companies offer is below Delta I would believe that. The question is how far below Delta is the offer? 1% or 10%? The next question is how far above Delta is your table position. That’s a very important number that never seems to get published. Keeping in mind that mediation will drive you to the Delta solution plus a % or two deciding to go that route is a tough choice for your negotiating committee given it adds substantial time to the process. Time is not your friend if you are looking at where your career earnings will end up.

In the United case you probably have more leverage than Delta because time is also not on managements side with your training situation. Time however works for management with the substantial sums saved delaying the contract. Full retro never happens in long delayed contracts. You get zero retro on work rules. Delta’s MEC preached that they would NEVER sign a contract without full retro and even wrote it into the union bylaws then caved on the issue for about 30 cents on the dollar.
Delta did have one thing going for them that you don’t at United. A less than smart CEO who went on national TV saying the Delta pilots would never be allowed to strike. The mediator took great offense to that statement. She controlled that issue not EB and threatened a near immediate release to self help if Delta management did not put an offer on the table that could close things out in a week. I doubt SK is as stupid as EB.
Very interesting post, thank you.

A brief comment on one item that I am lately reconsidering. There seems to be a consensus here and elsewhere on the issue of unfilled captain vacancies and training. I admit I agreed with said consensus up until someone pointed out that we have hundreds of surplus 737 captains in IAH, ORD, and DEN. We are staffed way more than what is needed to fly the hours we currently have. The company achieved this by offering captain vacancies in domiciles that were highly desired versus where the actual need lay. I have to believe this was done with intention on the part of the company to provide a buffer that gives them the supply of pilots, both CA and FO well into the future.

In other words, I'm not so sure there will be any pressure on the company to meet their pilot need for quite some time; not to mention that hiring seems to be continuing unabated regardless of negotiations stalling.
Sunvox is offline  
Old 04-13-2023, 05:54 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tesla S's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Position: 756FO
Posts: 104
Default

The company is feeling no pressure to provide an ILC any time soon. SK would welcome the mediation process and the time it would consume to finish that process.

Currently SK has all he need to run a profitable operation. TK is staffed, there is no longer a back log between sim and IOE, plenty of CAs to staff summer flying, and enough new hires coming off probation to fill the needed CA positions in the future.

If no one bid CA until we had am ILC we would be in great position, but FOMO is real and the pilots choosing to upgrade are providing enough CAs for the company to operate seamlessly,..

Unless SK is feeling particularly generous one day, we are in for a long mediation process to break even with DAL.
Tesla S is offline  
Old 04-13-2023, 06:11 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hummingbear's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,351
Default

Originally Posted by dead meat
Said the CA vacancies may lead to growth problems. Contract only way he sees fixing it.-
The union is telling him what the contract needs to have to actually fix his problem & he isn’t listening. If people are not upgrading under current book, does he really think a Delta approximate pay raise with no improvements to our crummy work rules is going to move the needle?
hummingbear is offline  
Old 04-13-2023, 06:21 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2022
Posts: 856
Default

The upgrades aren’t enough to operate seamlessly. They’re taking massive growth deliveries and captain upgrades are barely keeping pace with retirements

Plus they can only herd so many FO’s into IAH. Having 25% of the base in training won’t work.
Brickfire is offline  
Old 04-13-2023, 07:55 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
The union is telling him what the contract needs to have to actually fix his problem & he isn’t listening. If people are not upgrading under current book, does he really think a Delta approximate pay raise with no improvements to our crummy work rules is going to move the needle?
agreed. Maybe we should take the money and see what happens. I doubt that the “new” contract as it appears to still falling short on QOL issues will substantially motivate people to upgrade.

then SK has to come back and fix it with LOAs
TFAYD is offline  
Old 04-13-2023, 08:05 AM
  #29  
Porco Rosso
 
ninerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Default

Originally Posted by Tesla S
and enough new hires coming off probation to fill the needed CA positions in the future.
**** that. I came from a class that's heading toward the end of probation, and there's only one willing to take a quick upgrade.
ninerdriver is offline  
Old 04-13-2023, 08:05 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 141
Default

Originally Posted by TFAYD
agreed. Maybe we should take the money and see what happens. I doubt that the “new” contract as it appears to still falling short on QOL issues will substantially motivate people to upgrade.

then SK has to come back and fix it with LOAs

No. No we should not.
Lenticularis is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWRflyr
United
9
01-28-2012 11:34 AM
jetguy
Hangar Talk
3
09-23-2010 10:56 AM
CA Jimenez
United
8
09-06-2010 05:42 AM
Voski
Pilot Health
2
12-08-2009 02:24 PM
chrtrplt
Cargo
16
09-24-2006 12:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices