Search

Notices

Hiring to Increase

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2023, 03:42 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 324
Default Hiring to Increase

From the MEC Update:

“New hire classes run weekly with the target of 65-75 pilots per class. The company plans to increase this number.”

Heard the new hire classrooms in the new H building can hold 150 pilots. It will be interesting to see what happens at other airlines as we hire many of their pilots away from them. I’m hearing stories from FOs about their friends at “Brand X” that were given a job offer but ended up turning it down because they didn’t want to “give up seniority” whatever that is supposed to mean. Not sure that the some of the other airlines will be able to staff their deliveries if we hire even more of their pilots than we currently are.
FriendlyPilot is online now  
Old 04-04-2023, 04:18 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: A330 FO
Posts: 275
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
From the MEC Update:

“New hire classes run weekly with the target of 65-75 pilots per class. The company plans to increase this number.”

Heard the new hire classrooms in the new H building can hold 150 pilots. It will be interesting to see what happens at other airlines as we hire many of their pilots away from them. I’m hearing stories from FOs about their friends at “Brand X” that were given a job offer but ended up turning it down because they didn’t want to “give up seniority” whatever that is supposed to mean. Not sure that the some of the other airlines will be able to staff their deliveries if we hire even more of their pilots than we currently are.
Seems like a lot of hype. Last I read the FAA is making all the airlines cut capacity at the 3 New York airport's because they don't have enough controllers. Can the infrastructure even handle all this UAL growth?
Moonbeam is offline  
Old 04-04-2023, 04:24 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,157
Default

Originally Posted by Moonbeam
Seems like a lot of hype. Last I read the FAA is making all the airlines cut capacity at the 3 New York airport's because they don't have enough controllers. Can the infrastructure even handle all this UAL growth?
Read their post history. Obviously it’s a management hype-man or massive kool-aid drinker. Conveniently recent huge vacancies and this gets dropped after another disappointing update message from UA ALPA to it’s members. They use this to distract from the TA they’re currently negotiating, which is total garbage.

It’s becoming more apparent we’ll have to rely on AA for pattern bargaining.
LAXtoDEN is offline  
Old 04-04-2023, 04:33 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,961
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
From the MEC Update:

“New hire classes run weekly with the target of 65-75 pilots per class. The company plans to increase this number.”

Heard the new hire classrooms in the new H building can hold 150 pilots. It will be interesting to see what happens at other airlines as we hire many of their pilots away from them. I’m hearing stories from FOs about their friends at “Brand X” that were given a job offer but ended up turning it down because they didn’t want to “give up seniority” whatever that is supposed to mean. Not sure that the some of the other airlines will be able to staff their deliveries if we hire even more of their pilots than we currently are.
Not sure how United is going to staff deliveries with so many unfilled CA vacancies…
Otterbox is offline  
Old 04-04-2023, 04:35 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 324
Default

Originally Posted by Moonbeam
Seems like a lot of hype. Last I read the FAA is making all the airlines cut capacity at the 3 New York airport's because they don't have enough controllers. Can the infrastructure even handle all this UAL growth?
You know United has other pilot bases, right?
FriendlyPilot is online now  
Old 04-04-2023, 04:37 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 324
Default

Originally Posted by Otterbox
Not sure how United is going to staff deliveries with so many unfilled CA vacancies…
This is a legitimate concern. It likely gets solved with improved reserve rules with a new contract. Otherwise there is going to be a lot of Premium Pay trips this summer for guppy Captains.
FriendlyPilot is online now  
Old 04-04-2023, 05:28 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: A330 FO
Posts: 275
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
You know United has other pilot bases, right?
I do. I also know that it seems like the aerospace system can only handle a certain amount of planes flying around. So based on what your saying is that United's growth plan in the next five years will almost be like adding another airline to the system the size of SWA. Maybe it will happen, but the system seems overwhelmed in it's current state
Moonbeam is offline  
Old 04-04-2023, 06:31 PM
  #8  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: CL65
Posts: 15
Default

Originally Posted by Moonbeam
I do. I also know that it seems like the aerospace system can only handle a certain amount of planes flying around. So based on what your saying is that United's growth plan in the next five years will almost be like adding another airline to the system the size of SWA. Maybe it will happen, but the system seems overwhelmed in it's current state
If you look at United's "United Next" plan here:
https://ir.united.com/static-files/0...1-720e3d8d0e82

The plan is to up gauge aircraft.
"United Next will retire 200+ single cabin jets by 2026."
"Midwest hub departures on single-cabin regional jets: (ORD = 42%, but will be 4% estimated by 2026)
"Overall, single-class regional jets will go from 33% of North American departures to ~10%"
"Average domestic gauge grows by ~30 seats" (by 2026)
"‘United Next’ growth will primarily come from gauge"
"New generation large narrowbody aircraft provide significant fuel burn reduction": Fuel cost per seat (700 mile stage length) = $36 (50 seat RJ) vs $16 (MAX9)
"
Newer aircraft are at least 50% more fuel efficient per seat than our least efficient fleets"


As NB aircraft are added, regional jets will be removed.
USC328 is offline  
Old 04-04-2023, 06:41 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 324
Default

Originally Posted by Moonbeam
I do. I also know that it seems like the aerospace system can only handle a certain amount of planes flying around. So based on what your saying is that United's growth plan in the next five years will almost be like adding another airline to the system the size of SWA. Maybe it will happen, but the system seems overwhelmed in it's current state
You know that we have 600 RJs that we are replacing with mainline planes, right? We will only fly 160 RJs by 2028 and the other 440 planes will be mainline. So 1 RJ job for 1 mainline United job.
FriendlyPilot is online now  
Old 04-04-2023, 06:53 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: A330 FO
Posts: 275
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
You know that we have 600 RJs that we are replacing with mainline planes, right? We will only fly 160 RJs by 2028 and the other 440 planes will be mainline. So 1 RJ job for 1 mainline United job.
That makes more sense. I guess the only constraint will be getting the next generation motivated to pursue a flying career.
Moonbeam is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ray Kinsella
UPS
28
09-30-2021 08:09 AM
SonicFlyer
Safety
40
06-30-2018 09:54 PM
AeroCrewSolut
Hiring News
2
01-26-2012 09:49 PM
edavis
Hiring News
22
06-29-2011 04:38 PM
lolwut
Major
24
12-01-2010 03:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices