Anyone WN to UAL?
#51
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,321
Not saying our MEC wasn't at fault. They failed completely. The fact remains that SK's boasts about being the premier airline in history has so far been proven to be nothing more than drivel. He's the Baron Munchausen of Airline CEOs. Luckily for us, Delta led the way.
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 104
Kirby really does want for United to be a premier airline for our customers and stockholders. His job is to provide that at the lowest possible cost, including labor contracts. ALPA’s job is to define what our cost will be. Our previous MEC was totally at fault for even entertaining the Tumi TA. Kirby smiled and signed it as fast as he could, hoping that we really were stupid enough to ratify it. That’s his job.
Or in this case, throwing barbs at other airlines. He has also predicted that Jetblue will go bankrupt after the Spirit merger, and now we will kick SWA out of DEN. He’s quite the talker. Maybe time will prove him right. Maybe i’ll be slinging gear on a Boomjet to Paris in 8 years.
#53
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
you think it’s unprecedented?
AA -SFO
DL-DFW
UA-JFK
CO-DEN
UA-SEA
DL-ORD
IF AA isn’t careful they are going to get pushed out of LAX too by DL and UA.
prior to COVID AA cut all flying to Asia out of ORD. Everytime I’m in ORD I see nothing but Eagle flights.
this isn’t me Believing what Kirby says it’s me see what AA is doing.
AA -SFO
DL-DFW
UA-JFK
CO-DEN
UA-SEA
DL-ORD
IF AA isn’t careful they are going to get pushed out of LAX too by DL and UA.
prior to COVID AA cut all flying to Asia out of ORD. Everytime I’m in ORD I see nothing but Eagle flights.
this isn’t me Believing what Kirby says it’s me see what AA is doing.
Let’s introduce some facts, if only for a moment. In 2022, UAL had 18,206,543 available seats in ORD. AA had 13,418,161. Number three is DAL with 1,929,739. If you think that means AA is barely a factor in ORD, then UAL is too.
Last edited by El Peso; 02-19-2023 at 06:13 PM.
#54
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2022
Posts: 90
honestly I don’t think the company would bat an eye. AA pilots and APA has been saying this for months and the classes are still being filled.
no matter how old our contract is….it is still better than nearly everyone else. I mean look at the latest thread about SW pilots applying, they are well aware of what’s going on here and they are still coming. Same with Spirit, Frontier, JetBlue, these pilots aren’t ignorant.
Most of these individuals know we will get a contract soon and don’t see the struggle WE have been going through because to them the old contract is extremely temporary.
no matter how old our contract is….it is still better than nearly everyone else. I mean look at the latest thread about SW pilots applying, they are well aware of what’s going on here and they are still coming. Same with Spirit, Frontier, JetBlue, these pilots aren’t ignorant.
Most of these individuals know we will get a contract soon and don’t see the struggle WE have been going through because to them the old contract is extremely temporary.
Alaska, Spirit, JetBlue, Hawaiian, UPS, FedEx, Delta (+TA) all have higher pay and much better QOL than us currently. We are basically tied with American, slightly better than Southwest, and only Allegiant and Frontier measurably below us. There's quite a few contract comparisons already out before everyone started getting new deals that had us pretty much middle ground overall (with widebodies adding value), but now we're pretty close to bottom of the barrel.
#55
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,321
Of course thats his job. My point is that there seems to be a lot of pilots here that get all giddy whenever he throws out a line about how quick and easy it will be to present us an industry leading deal. When in reality, in his eyes the TUMI TA was a great deal. Until we voted it down unanimously.
#56
Originally Posted by dailyops;[url=tel:3594845
3594845]It's amazing you think we still have a better contract than most...
Alaska, Spirit, JetBlue, Hawaiian, UPS, FedEx, Delta (+TA) all have higher pay and much better QOL than us currently. We are basically tied with American, slightly better than Southwest, and only Allegiant and Frontier measurably below us. There's quite a few contract comparisons already out before everyone started getting new deals that had us pretty much middle ground overall (with widebodies adding value), but now we're pretty close to bottom of the barrel.
Alaska, Spirit, JetBlue, Hawaiian, UPS, FedEx, Delta (+TA) all have higher pay and much better QOL than us currently. We are basically tied with American, slightly better than Southwest, and only Allegiant and Frontier measurably below us. There's quite a few contract comparisons already out before everyone started getting new deals that had us pretty much middle ground overall (with widebodies adding value), but now we're pretty close to bottom of the barrel.
yeah well that’s not who is applying here. So yeah they have all out done us for now but all the regionals and AMCIs are still worse…..ALSO we seem to be getting a lot of Alaska Spirit and JetBlue even with their “superior contracts”.
ita takes more then pay to make a good contract right? Or are you a individual that opens Section 3 and votes accordingly?
#57
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,118
It's amazing you think we still have a better contract than most...
Alaska, Spirit, JetBlue, Hawaiian, UPS, FedEx, Delta (+TA) all have higher pay and much better QOL than us currently. We are basically tied with American, slightly better than Southwest, and only Allegiant and Frontier measurably below us. There's quite a few contract comparisons already out before everyone started getting new deals that had us pretty much middle ground overall (with widebodies adding value), but now we're pretty close to bottom of the barrel.
Alaska, Spirit, JetBlue, Hawaiian, UPS, FedEx, Delta (+TA) all have higher pay and much better QOL than us currently. We are basically tied with American, slightly better than Southwest, and only Allegiant and Frontier measurably below us. There's quite a few contract comparisons already out before everyone started getting new deals that had us pretty much middle ground overall (with widebodies adding value), but now we're pretty close to bottom of the barrel.
Layovers can be as short as 8 hours
2, 3 and 4 leg redeyes multiple nights in a row on some fleets
No offline commuter policy
Online commuter policy is extremely restrictive (commute in must be duty-legal to count for protection, even though it's not actually duty. And it has to fit within the same duty period as your operating leg, and there's even more restrictions. It's almost impossible to meet all the requirements to be protected if you're not operating domestic)
Un-augmented crossings from IND to STN, EWR to CDG in the middle of the night
Can be extended up to 36hrs into time off domestically, or 84hrs into time off internationally
Line-holders can be revised to sit hotel reserve for no extra pay
FedEx has something called substitution which is miserable
Reserve call out can be as low as 1 hour in Memphis...
You will be driving some of the most dangerous roads in the country to work from your crashpad.
They can take your entire trip and give it to someone else (likely someone who's jump-seating home on your flight) at 150% and then put you on the trip that nobody wanted to do, and you'll get 0 extra pay.
Pilots at FedEx sit Field Standby just like you.
25% of FedEx pilots are on PBS don't know their schedule until the last Wednesday of the bid month.
A FedEx pilot on long call reserve has to answer the phone 24 hours before his reserve period actually starts, on short call, you have to answer 90 minutes before you're scheduled for reserve.
When you finish a long call reserve assignment they can force you to start another assignment immediately if you're legal, or release you to min rest and then make you come back. Same on short call obviously.
Even once assigned a trip, reserves don't get any work rules or trip guarantees that line-holders do towards their leveling. Only international overrides, block hour overrides, and international per diem that go straight to their paycheck.
#58
Originally Posted by El Peso;[url=tel:3594834
3594834[/url]]Is there anything more anecdotal and devoid of data then “every time I’m in ORD I see nothing but Eagle flights”?
Let’s introduce some facts, if only for a moment. In 2022, UAL had 18,206,543 available seats in ORD. AA had 13,418,161. Number three is DAL with 1,929,739. If you think that means AA is barely a factor in ORD, then UAL is too.
Let’s introduce some facts, if only for a moment. In 2022, UAL had 18,206,543 available seats in ORD. AA had 13,418,161. Number three is DAL with 1,929,739. If you think that means AA is barely a factor in ORD, then UAL is too.
hmmm….looks like AA is a Distant second….
#59
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
The only gate UAL operates out of the C gates is the one owned by the city. And I’m not even sure why you guys park there when you have an entire terminal. It’s gotta be a PITA for crews and pax to have to get off and take the train to B and haul ass to the end to catch their next flight in 30 min.
WN is growing to around 400 flights a day in DEN and AA will be evicted from the C gates and moving back to A in a year or so. It’ll be the biggest base for WN….and it’s not going anywhere. If UAL is going to 900 flights a day….you’re gonna need way more gates and a couple more runways…neither is happening anytime soon.
WN is growing to around 400 flights a day in DEN and AA will be evicted from the C gates and moving back to A in a year or so. It’ll be the biggest base for WN….and it’s not going anywhere. If UAL is going to 900 flights a day….you’re gonna need way more gates and a couple more runways…neither is happening anytime soon.
Saw three over at A about two weeks ago. Surprised me. Yes having to move between terminals is a giant PITA. Done the “last gate in A to last gate in B” run. It sucks.
400 flights to where? Can’t grow anywhere. I keep hearing about DEN to HI on SWA but how do you think you’ll do that without augmenting? We block 7:59 flight planned at .83. Even if it was possible, a 737 can’t compete in CASM to a 753/777/787 on a stage length like that.
Needing to push out AA makes no sense as Ua was running 700/day out of the B gates precovid.
#60
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,118
400 flights to where? Can’t grow anywhere. I keep hearing about DEN to HI on SWA but how do you think you’ll do that without augmenting? We block 7:59 flight planned at .83. Even if it was possible, a 737 can’t compete in CASM to a 753/777/787 on a stage length like that.
Needing to push out AA makes no sense as Ua was running 700/day out of the B gates precovid.
Either way, we're debating hopes and dreams here. Most of these growth plans will be tanked by either the inability to hire pilots or economic troubles, or maybe both.
Last edited by threeighteen; 02-20-2023 at 01:03 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EngineOut
Regional
153
05-10-2017 10:12 AM