![[Key Takeaway]](/iconimages/united/key-takeaway_ltr.gif)
[Key Takeaway]
01-15-2023, 08:41 PM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,808
I suppose a summary sentence if fine if you have something to sum up. Unfortunately, the Key Takeaway is about equal to the body of the report, or, one to two sentences. There’s no actual content.
This committee is putting out a woefully low volume of work and only talks about Comm goals. We’re ready Comm - go.
Considering that we’re going to be asked to read a complex multi-thousand page TA document soon - we’d better be up to the task of reading longer passages.
Belittling the pilot group by addressing them as junior high dropouts is just disingenuous and mean. Publishing three sentences and calling it communications is just lazy.
So which is it?
01-16-2023, 09:59 AM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 113
After the MEC’s **** show of the last year my feeling is way more info rather than less is what we need.
I suppose a summary sentence if fine if you have something to sum up. Unfortunately, the Key Takeaway is about equal to the body of the report, or, one to two sentences. There’s no actual content.
This committee is putting out a woefully low volume of work and only talks about Comm goals. We’re ready Comm - go.
Considering that we’re going to be asked to read a complex multi-thousand page TA document soon - we’d better be up to the task of reading longer passages.
Belittling the pilot group by addressing them as junior high dropouts is just disingenuous and mean. Publishing three sentences and calling it communications is just lazy.
So which is it?
I suppose a summary sentence if fine if you have something to sum up. Unfortunately, the Key Takeaway is about equal to the body of the report, or, one to two sentences. There’s no actual content.
This committee is putting out a woefully low volume of work and only talks about Comm goals. We’re ready Comm - go.
Considering that we’re going to be asked to read a complex multi-thousand page TA document soon - we’d better be up to the task of reading longer passages.
Belittling the pilot group by addressing them as junior high dropouts is just disingenuous and mean. Publishing three sentences and calling it communications is just lazy.
So which is it?
Unfortunately the reality is day to day, pilots have poor reading comprehension. You need to boil it down and spell it out for them otherwise their key takeaway may be different from the key takeaway you wanted them to have.
[key takeaway] Pilots not so smart.
01-16-2023, 01:53 PM
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2022
Posts: 148
Instead of all those pesky unlit towers individually listed, there can just be a single NOTAM for the entire US.
“Numerous unlit towers in vicinity of airfields in the United States.”
Extrapolated further: “Some taxiways in the US are closed.” “Some approach minimums have changed in the US”
NOTAMS checked.
Absolutely genius.
01-16-2023, 02:40 PM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,891
This is a great idea that can be exploited for notams.
Instead of all those pesky unlit towers individually listed, there can just be a single NOTAM for the entire US.
“Numerous unlit towers in vicinity of airfields in the United States.”
Extrapolated further: “Some taxiways in the US are closed.” “Some approach minimums have changed in the US”
NOTAMS checked.
Absolutely genius.
Instead of all those pesky unlit towers individually listed, there can just be a single NOTAM for the entire US.
“Numerous unlit towers in vicinity of airfields in the United States.”
Extrapolated further: “Some taxiways in the US are closed.” “Some approach minimums have changed in the US”
NOTAMS checked.
Absolutely genius.
