Search

Notices

Here Come The -900s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-2022, 07:26 AM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hummingbear's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,351
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr
Enjoy your 8 leg days with overnights in BFE then. I’ve got no problem with 50 seat jets at the regionals. It’s larger jets that we should be focused on getting to mainline.
The idea is that no one currently on property would be flying said trips unless they intentionally bid down to fly them. It would be added flying that would require additional pilots- likely those same pilots who are currently flying those trips at the regionals. So it brings more pilots to the airline- getting them on the seniority list quicker & providing additional security for those already here- while improving the integrity & fidelity of our short-range flying for our customers. So it’s like a win/win/win/win. (Though I think the customers would much rather an ERJ than a CRJ, FWIW)
hummingbear is offline  
Old 12-28-2022, 08:15 AM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,961
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr
Enjoy your 8 leg days with overnights in BFE then. I’ve got no problem with 50 seat jets at the regionals. It’s larger jets that we should be focused on getting to mainline.
Same 117 limits apply to RJs and airbus/Boeing… 8 leg days aren’t a thing and haven’t been in a looooong time.
Otterbox is offline  
Old 12-28-2022, 09:18 AM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
The idea is that no one currently on property would be flying said trips unless they intentionally bid down to fly them. It would be added flying that would require additional pilots- likely those same pilots who are currently flying those trips at the regionals. So it brings more pilots to the airline- getting them on the seniority list quicker & providing additional security for those already here- while improving the integrity & fidelity of our short-range flying for our customers. So it’s like a win/win/win/win. (Though I think the customers would much rather an ERJ than a CRJ, FWIW)
there could be unlimited ERJ if flown by mainline - another win.
TFAYD is offline  
Old 12-29-2022, 08:17 AM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 862
Default

Originally Posted by TFAYD
there could be unlimited ERJ if flown by mainline - another win.
And they could put about 5 extra seats in them, too. 81 vs 76.

Not sure how they'd staff them, though. F/Os would bid up at the first opportunity due to the difference in year 2 pay and 737 and 320 Captain bids already go unfilled.
Larry in TN is offline  
Old 12-29-2022, 01:20 PM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Swakid8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,525
Default

Originally Posted by Larry in TN
And they could put about 5 extra seats in them, too. 81 vs 76.

Not sure how they'd staff them, though. F/Os would bid up at the first opportunity due to the difference in year 2 pay and 737 and 320 Captain bids already go unfilled.
The solution is to create a fence for folks coming from the street with no 121/Turbine/Military time or Aviate students. Those folks would go straight to the ERJ fleet and seat lock them there for a certain amount of time for the FO side. For the left seat, the company needs to create a incentive to fill Captain and LCA slots for the fleet.
Swakid8 is offline  
Old 12-29-2022, 03:22 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,501
Default

Originally Posted by Swakid8
The solution is to create a fence for folks coming from the street with no 121/Turbine/Military time or Aviate students. Those folks would go straight to the ERJ fleet and seat lock them there for a certain amount of time for the FO side. For the left seat, the company needs to create a incentive to fill Captain and LCA slots for the fleet.
It wouldn’t even be that hard. The rates would make the left seat a junior fleet, but plenty of people would bid it to make more than a NB FO. It’s just a seniority puzzle. At the bottom, you will always have the same problem we do today. For the <70% relative seniority, it wouldn’t matter.
ThumbsUp is offline  
Old 12-29-2022, 09:43 PM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 432
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
It wouldn’t even be that hard. The rates would make the left seat a junior fleet, but plenty of people would bid it to make more than a NB FO. It’s just a seniority puzzle. At the bottom, you will always have the same problem we do today. For the <70% relative seniority, it wouldn’t matter.
I’d be fine going from a mid seniority FO on a NB to the #1 175 cap in base as long as it paid a fair wage and the trip construction wasn’t hell. It would likely be the longer, thinner RJ flying, probably close to a bus schedule just fewer seats.
01110011 is offline  
Old 12-29-2022, 10:09 PM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by 01110011
I’d be fine going from a mid seniority FO on a NB to the #1 175 cap in base as long as it paid a fair wage and the trip construction wasn’t hell. It would likely be the longer, thinner RJ flying, probably close to a bus schedule just fewer seats.
It would be the same RJ flying that is done by regionals but at a fair wage and maybe some better work rules - but that is debatable
TFAYD is offline  
Old 12-29-2022, 10:39 PM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 432
Default

Originally Posted by TFAYD
It would be the same RJ flying that is done by regionals but at a fair wage and maybe some better work rules - but that is debatable
All RJ flying is not created equal. Your -200/145 crews and your 170/175 crews are doing on average very different flying. The 170/175 stuff is pretty close to what the bus does. They’re doing BZN out of ORD or CMH out of DEN which leads to something approaching a humane schedule. Not quite the same meat grinder as the 200 ORD-MKE-ORD-IND-ORD-PIA days.

I’d happily upgrade into a 175 over right seat on a NB. A -200, not so much.
01110011 is offline  
Old 12-29-2022, 11:22 PM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by 01110011
All RJ flying is not created equal. Your -200/145 crews and your 170/175 crews are doing on average very different flying. The 170/175 stuff is pretty close to what the bus does. They’re doing BZN out of ORD or CMH out of DEN which leads to something approaching a humane schedule. Not quite the same meat grinder as the 200 ORD-MKE-ORD-IND-ORD-PIA days.

I’d happily upgrade into a 175 over right seat on a NB. A -200, not so much.
yes, they will do the same 175 RJ flying they do today - and then some. The 200 is around because scope limits the 175. With unlimited 175 at mainline I would expect pretty much all 200/145 to go away and being replaced by 175. In turn you might see ORD - MKE or ORD - IND on a 175 as well.

Some folks may like that or split duty trips over red eyes - especially if the money is right.
TFAYD is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
prior121
Mesa Airlines
33
09-28-2013 07:30 PM
lolwut
Major
37
08-14-2012 09:11 AM
Atwoo155
Regional
18
12-05-2008 08:15 AM
PinnacleFO
Regional
178
10-29-2008 09:33 AM
soon2bfo
GoJet
22
08-22-2007 10:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices