Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Here Come the Widebodies >

Here Come the Widebodies

Search

Notices

Here Come the Widebodies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-2022, 03:21 PM
  #231  
Gets Weekends Off
 
elmetal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,464
Default

Originally Posted by johnwick
FiFi no doubt has her quirks, but in the 4000 hours I’ve flown her I have never seen those things, other than the +/- 20 kts in managed speed. But I will take the A320 and all her quirkiness all day, every day and twice on Sunday rather than fly the guppy with its Apollo 13 overhead panel.
this is such a ridiculous argument, the 737 does the same thing except it's -5 + 50. look it up. it's the only way to stay on path. in fact every one of the 737s we have descend ridiculously faster than planned even if you plug in A/I and faster tailwinds in the des forecast page.

the 737 is a pile. period.
elmetal is offline  
Old 12-15-2022, 04:15 PM
  #232  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,135
Default

Originally Posted by TFAYD
that was the design principle for the bus. It was designed for the lowest common denominator. Airbus realized that a lot of growth is in emerging markets.
yet they still crash.
PNWFlyer is offline  
Old 12-15-2022, 06:16 PM
  #233  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 545
Default

Originally Posted by UALFlyer
I get it, you don't like the plane.

But, it's a safer plane, no matter how much you want to squint when you look at the data. Where you train makes no difference.
​​​​​​Prove it?? Show me numbers to back it up??
I did.
GPullR is offline  
Old 12-15-2022, 06:18 PM
  #234  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 545
Default

Originally Posted by elmetal
this is such a ridiculous argument, the 737 does the same thing except it's -5 + 50. look it up. it's the only way to stay on path. in fact every one of the 737s we have descend ridiculously faster than planned even if you plug in A/I and faster tailwinds in the des forecast page.

the 737 is a pile. period.
1000s of hours it, no problems. Plan for tailwind accordingly. NEVER had a Boeing give up and decend below restriction altitudes on top of never telling you.
GPullR is offline  
Old 12-15-2022, 06:28 PM
  #235  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 432
Default

Originally Posted by GPullR
1000s of hours it, no problems. Plan for tailwind accordingly. NEVER had a Boeing give up and decend below restriction altitudes on top of never telling you.
What are you defining as “descending below”?
50’, 100’?
I’ve never had it dip more than 25’ or so and that’s like .2-.1 miles out without telling me. I’ve seen one miscoded arrival and the box showed that it was going to cross low and I just manually intervened. Not a surprise since it www projecting a crossing 400’ below the restriction well ahead of time.
01110011 is offline  
Old 12-15-2022, 07:09 PM
  #236  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2020
Posts: 95
Default

Originally Posted by GPullR
​​​​​​Prove it?? Show me numbers to back it up??
I did.
No, what you pulled from what you "showed" me was the NG subset against ALL A320s. Using your same page look at all 737 compared to all A320. There's your answer.


Also, answer me this. Do you honestly think the 737 is safer than the A320 (repeat question from post #209)?

Last edited by UALFlyer; 12-15-2022 at 07:16 PM. Reason: Adding info
UALFlyer is offline  
Old 12-15-2022, 07:26 PM
  #237  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
Default

Originally Posted by GPullR
Um, one the captain pulled a ton of circuit breakers, put plane in direct law and fo was watching . FO turned around and plane was banked 60 plus degrees and nose high. He couldn't overcome with his lack of experience.
You can Google the accident report. The FO was flying when the Captain reset 2 breakers associated with the rudder. This put the aircraft into alternate law and disconnected the autopilot. The copilot was unable to fly the aircraft in alternate law and stalled it. They attempted to recover the aircraft but were working against each other with conflicting stick inputs much like AirFrance. The aircraft was never in direct law.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 12-15-2022, 08:48 PM
  #238  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Position: Power Isosceles
Posts: 119
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
You can Google the accident report. The FO was flying when the Captain reset 2 breakers associated with the rudder. This put the aircraft into alternate law and disconnected the autopilot. The copilot was unable to fly the aircraft in alternate law and stalled it. They attempted to recover the aircraft but were working against each other with conflicting stick inputs much like AirFrance. The aircraft was never in direct law.
Wondering if you fly an Airbus?? Do you know the difference between alternate law vs unusual attitude “abnormal” alternate law vs direct law??? This scenario comes down to the use of unauthorized procedures, and shall I say reckless behavior on the part of the captain, coupled with a complete lack of sidestick discipline. Whether the aircraft was in direct law or alternate law isn’t really the issue
johnwick is offline  
Old 12-16-2022, 04:13 AM
  #239  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
Default

Originally Posted by johnwick
Wondering if you fly an Airbus?? Do you know the difference between alternate law vs unusual attitude “abnormal” alternate law vs direct law??? This scenario comes down to the use of unauthorized procedures, and shall I say reckless behavior on the part of the captain, coupled with a complete lack of sidestick discipline. Whether the aircraft was in direct law or alternate law isn’t really the issue
I have not flown it as much as Boeings but have about 6000 hours in Airbus aircraft. There were two issues in this accident. The Captain used a incorrect procedure and the copilot was unable to hand fly the aircraft in alternate law. It did not become a unusual attitude until he lost control. Both the A320 and A330 are more AOA critical than the Boeings. A third Airbus was lost in the MED on a test flight when it suffered two AOA failures for unknown reasons and the crew received no warning before they attempted to test the stall protections.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 12-16-2022, 06:36 AM
  #240  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
Default

Only hull loss in North America of an A320 series was the Hudson River at the time, which probably wouldn’t have been as survivable in a guppy… lands too fast and in every accident that plane breaks into 3 parts. Every landing in a guppy feels like an emergency to the pax.

Bus is wider, quieter, more comfortable from front to back, and most importantly the toilet seat stays up.
Grumble is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
H60 DUSTOFF
JetBlue
1590
07-01-2022 03:10 PM
FangsF15
Delta
609
10-08-2020 09:43 AM
goldfinger
Cargo
797
03-23-2018 09:19 AM
MarineHarrier
Major
131
02-02-2018 10:35 AM
iahflyr
Cargo
2
06-03-2015 08:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices