New MCO/TPA and LAS 737 Bases Annoucned
#63
Given that pilots are a finite supply at the moment, we do not have the option to simply add bodies at will. Taking away, rollable days off while obviously has quality of life benefits for our reserves, would be a giant manpower negative move… This would force the company to take the December (reserve staffing) approach for most of the year, by pushing on the G line and keeping more pilots on reserve with much higher line values for line holders. I’m not saying there’s right answer, but it’s a zero sum game.
The only reserve rules that matter to the company, are those for narrowbody captains. They can put new hires into widebody reserve, and at this point, there is no shortage of people ready to bid widebody captain reserve. So give him the companies desire to grow aggressively, and the fact that there is a limited supply of pilots in the ecosystem right now, if you reduce a reserve’s obligation to the company, thus increasing their quality of life, you are going to make life more miserable for most line holders. The fact that people come on here and pretend this isn’t the reality is a little silly.
December was a clear example that it’s a zero sum game. Pick your poison.
The only reserve rules that matter to the company, are those for narrowbody captains. They can put new hires into widebody reserve, and at this point, there is no shortage of people ready to bid widebody captain reserve. So give him the companies desire to grow aggressively, and the fact that there is a limited supply of pilots in the ecosystem right now, if you reduce a reserve’s obligation to the company, thus increasing their quality of life, you are going to make life more miserable for most line holders. The fact that people come on here and pretend this isn’t the reality is a little silly.
December was a clear example that it’s a zero sum game. Pick your poison.
#64
Pilots who previously worked at the regionals are quite familiar with being based at non-hub airports. I’m curious if it will follow the same model of first flight out, last flight back => non-commutable trips.
#66
Most likely, I could see MCO trips being structured this way. The other possibility is commutable trips on one end only. LAS flying might be a bit different with more red eyes….l
#67
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2022
Posts: 856
The base is being established solely for people who don’t want to commute
#68
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,039
In the town hall they came right out and said expect the trips out of LAS and MCO to be mostly 3-4 days and it would be MCO/LAS-HUB then normal hub flying ending with a leg back to MCO/LAS. Expanded more on LAS and said expect there to be substantial all nighter flying. Basically paid commuting for locals with the bonus of potentially poaching even more JB/Spirit people who don’t want to commute.
#69
In the town hall they came right out and said expect the trips out of LAS and MCO to be mostly 3-4 days and it would be MCO/LAS-HUB then normal hub flying ending with a leg back to MCO/LAS. Expanded more on LAS and said expect there to be substantial all nighter flying. Basically paid commuting for locals with the bonus of potentially poaching even more JB/Spirit people who don’t want to commute.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post