Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
New MCO/TPA and LAS 737 Bases Annoucned >

New MCO/TPA and LAS 737 Bases Annoucned

Search

Notices

New MCO/TPA and LAS 737 Bases Annoucned

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2022, 03:54 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,360
Default

Global reserve needs to die.
JTwift is offline  
Old 12-02-2022, 03:57 AM
  #62  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 309
Default

Originally Posted by JTwift
Global reserve needs to die.
Any type of “rollable day off” or “flexible day off” needs to die.
Mitch Rapp is offline  
Old 12-02-2022, 05:27 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Chowdah's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Posts: 225
Default

Originally Posted by Mitch Rapp
Any type of “rollable day off” or “flexible day off” needs to die.
Given that pilots are a finite supply at the moment, we do not have the option to simply add bodies at will. Taking away, rollable days off while obviously has quality of life benefits for our reserves, would be a giant manpower negative move… This would force the company to take the December (reserve staffing) approach for most of the year, by pushing on the G line and keeping more pilots on reserve with much higher line values for line holders. I’m not saying there’s right answer, but it’s a zero sum game.

The only reserve rules that matter to the company, are those for narrowbody captains. They can put new hires into widebody reserve, and at this point, there is no shortage of people ready to bid widebody captain reserve. So give him the companies desire to grow aggressively, and the fact that there is a limited supply of pilots in the ecosystem right now, if you reduce a reserve’s obligation to the company, thus increasing their quality of life, you are going to make life more miserable for most line holders. The fact that people come on here and pretend this isn’t the reality is a little silly.

December was a clear example that it’s a zero sum game. Pick your poison.
Chowdah is offline  
Old 12-02-2022, 06:19 AM
  #64  
Jorts and New Balance
 
dingdong's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Position: Ready for the overnight
Posts: 153
Default

Pilots who previously worked at the regionals are quite familiar with being based at non-hub airports. I’m curious if it will follow the same model of first flight out, last flight back => non-commutable trips.
dingdong is offline  
Old 12-02-2022, 07:03 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Swakid8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,525
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
All 12 of them!😂
12 Ha Ha ha
Swakid8 is offline  
Old 12-02-2022, 07:06 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Swakid8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,525
Default

Originally Posted by dingdong
Pilots who previously worked at the regionals are quite familiar with being based at non-hub airports. I’m curious if it will follow the same model of first flight out, last flight back => non-commutable trips.
Most likely, I could see MCO trips being structured this way. The other possibility is commutable trips on one end only. LAS flying might be a bit different with more red eyes….l
Swakid8 is offline  
Old 12-02-2022, 07:55 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2022
Posts: 856
Default

Originally Posted by dingdong
Pilots who previously worked at the regionals are quite familiar with being based at non-hub airports. I’m curious if it will follow the same model of first flight out, last flight back => non-commutable trips.
The base is being established solely for people who don’t want to commute
Brickfire is offline  
Old 12-02-2022, 07:56 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,039
Default

Originally Posted by Swakid8
Most likely, I could see MCO trips being structured this way. The other possibility is commutable trips on one end only. LAS flying might be a bit different with more red eyes….l
In the town hall they came right out and said expect the trips out of LAS and MCO to be mostly 3-4 days and it would be MCO/LAS-HUB then normal hub flying ending with a leg back to MCO/LAS. Expanded more on LAS and said expect there to be substantial all nighter flying. Basically paid commuting for locals with the bonus of potentially poaching even more JB/Spirit people who don’t want to commute.
UALinIAH is offline  
Old 12-02-2022, 08:04 AM
  #69  
Orbis Non Sufficit
 
Nucflash's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 735
Default

Originally Posted by UALinIAH
In the town hall they came right out and said expect the trips out of LAS and MCO to be mostly 3-4 days and it would be MCO/LAS-HUB then normal hub flying ending with a leg back to MCO/LAS. Expanded more on LAS and said expect there to be substantial all nighter flying. Basically paid commuting for locals with the bonus of potentially poaching even more JB/Spirit people who don’t want to commute.
And have FL or PHX/LAS people think twice about going to AA or SWA….
Nucflash is offline  
Old 12-02-2022, 08:46 AM
  #70  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2022
Posts: 36
Default

We need to raise our daily guaranty over 5 hours a day. That is the only way to make non productive NB flying worth leaving the WB for. Make a 4 day guaranty 22 hours and it might be worth the upgrade.
list is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lbell
Regional
8
12-16-2019 08:41 PM
Kapitanleutnant
Foreign
0
04-11-2015 07:32 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices