Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
New MCO/TPA and LAS 737 Bases Annoucned >

New MCO/TPA and LAS 737 Bases Annoucned

Search

Notices

New MCO/TPA and LAS 737 Bases Annoucned

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2022, 05:30 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,039
Default

Originally Posted by Sixty N Two
They flat out said we needed to address the Capt vacancies. Opening MCO (maybe TPA) and LAS is to address this need. They have a huge vacancy coming to allow basically anyone who wants to be a NB Capt to get the base they want. They are going to deliberately offer more Capt vacancies than they need. Once they know where pilots want to live crew Scheduling will adjust the flying to where people bid.

Not telling you or other to take the bid or not, but you asked how, so that’s how, if people take bids vs waiting it out for better work rules in our next TA, then what reason does the company have for accepting our requirement for better work rules (reserve or otherwise)?
I agree that’s our leverage but I won’t fault a pilot for taking an upgrade. Those pilots need to think about the long term pain of that upgrade as well though. They came right out and said they’re increasing reserve levels. So taking that upgrade early means even more time on our draconian reserve rules until we get a contract with some QOL gains. The bid next Friday should be interesting since they tipped their hand saying they’re going to put out way more NB CA vacancies than they can fill to see where the pilots go and adjust the flying accordingly. That tends to make some really crappy and inefficient flying…..
UALinIAH is offline  
Old 11-30-2022, 05:53 PM
  #22  
line slug
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: B777 Captain
Posts: 220
Default

Originally Posted by Sixty N Two
They flat out said we needed to address the Capt vacancies. Opening MCO (maybe TPA) and LAS is to address this need.
Except it won’t address that need. MCO will initially be all FL commuters, most of whom now commute to EWR and DC. So, all they’re going to do is create more captain slots in the northeast bases.

Ditto in LAS with SFO/LAX commuters.

IMO the goal with the new bases is simply shifting staffing elsewhere (the infamous Crew Planning shell game) as they know they can’t support the “fortress hub” staffing model in the expensive and less desirable (to some) coastal bases.

(Who knows? The new bases might even help with system recovery when the entire northeast (or SFO) goes on its ass with ATC and/or WX delays as the schedule returns to pre-pandemic levels.)

Bottom line: The company has a huge staffing problem now and they know it, and these new bases are proof of that. We have more leverage now than we’ve ever had.
jdavk is offline  
Old 11-30-2022, 06:00 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hummingbear's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,351
Default

Originally Posted by PilotGR
Seriously, No one should be MCO or LAS until we get a contract. Nobody should bid CA slots. Kinda late now..pilots will be pilots. 10 steps behind management...
Individuals may do as they please, but I’m pretty sure any concerted effort to leave seats unfilled would be illegal.
hummingbear is offline  
Old 11-30-2022, 07:09 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Half wing's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: 787 right
Posts: 504
Default

Interesting the company was covering by saying these bases won’t have any new flying. The growth for United next will come at the expense of spirit, JetBlue and Frontier. I think that is a huge reason for the MCO/LAS pilot bases but they won’t say it publicly. The ULCC’s are going to be hemorrhaging pilots even more now. They will be the next ones to come out with huge raises for their pilots.
Half wing is offline  
Old 11-30-2022, 07:25 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: 737/FO
Posts: 195
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
Individuals may do as they please, but I’m pretty sure any concerted effort to leave seats unfilled would be illegal.
100 percent agree, nobody should be shamed guilted. If it works for you good for you. I was trying to explain the reason why I think the company finally opened a pilot base in MCO.
Sixty N Two is offline  
Old 11-30-2022, 08:20 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 324
Default

Originally Posted by PilotGR
Here is a thought. For all those morons that took captain bids in IAH..thank you. We just spent our union dues recalling LECs and here you guys are taking bids that were moved from coasts.

Seriously, No one should be MCO or LAS until we get a contract. Nobody should bid CA slots. Kinda late now..pilots will be pilots. 10 steps behind management...
How brave of you to advocate that some other pilot sacrifice themselves while you are probably already where you want to be. Such an inspiration.
FriendlyPilot is offline  
Old 11-30-2022, 10:29 PM
  #27  
Orbis Non Sufficit
 
Nucflash's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 735
Default

Originally Posted by jdavk
Except it won’t address that need. MCO will initially be all FL commuters, most of whom now commute to EWR and DC. So, all they’re going to do is create more captain slots in the northeast bases.

Ditto in LAS with SFO/LAX commuters.
No, the new bases will basically be running first leg into a hub and last leg out of a hub. So MCO will be effectively covering what were EWR or DCA trips, for example, with those two additional legs tagged on. So no additional vacancies created at the old bases.
Nucflash is offline  
Old 12-01-2022, 12:25 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2022
Posts: 856
Default

Originally Posted by Nucflash
So no additional vacancies created at the old bases.
They might

This is a seniority arbitrage play. It’s not that people don’t want ewr 737 ca, the dont want junior ewr 737 ca. So you create a way to move the top off newark and people who have ewr 737ca 50th percentile bids now move up
Brickfire is offline  
Old 12-01-2022, 01:33 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2022
Posts: 148
Default

Originally Posted by jdavk
Except it won’t address that need. MCO will initially be all FL commuters, most of whom now commute to EWR and DC. So, all they’re going to do is create more captain slots in the northeast bases.

Ditto in LAS with SFO/LAX commuters.

IMO the goal with the new bases is simply shifting staffing elsewhere (the infamous Crew Planning shell game) as they know they can’t support the “fortress hub” staffing model in the expensive and less desirable (to some) coastal bases.

(Who knows? The new bases might even help with system recovery when the entire northeast (or SFO) goes on its ass with ATC and/or WX delays as the schedule returns to pre-pandemic levels.)

Bottom line: The company has a huge staffing problem now and they know it, and these new bases are proof of that. We have more leverage now than we’ve ever had.

This isn’t only a staffing move. The company’s presence in the SE is lackluster and they’ve been missing out on revenue opportunities. A stronger SE position allows for more direct competition with regionals/majors that hold down a lot of the SE flying.
Spartacusbob is offline  
Old 12-01-2022, 04:14 AM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Posts: 82
Default

Originally Posted by Spartacusbob
This isn’t only a staffing move. The company’s presence in the SE is lackluster and they’ve been missing out on revenue opportunities. A stronger SE position allows for more direct competition with regionals/majors that hold down a lot of the SE flying.

The impression i got from the town hall and the CRU was that there will be no additional service to the SE at all. It’s just shifting flying from other bases crews. I believe it’s purely a junior base staffing solution and a pilot recruiting tool
UnableVNAVPTH is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lbell
Regional
8
12-16-2019 08:41 PM
Kapitanleutnant
Foreign
0
04-11-2015 07:32 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices