Search

Notices

Road to TA2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-2022, 01:50 AM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,525
Default

Originally Posted by awax
I was asking this question over the summer, and my conclusion is that this reaction to TA1 is all anger - no plan forward.

The anger crowd seems to believe that remove and replace will fix everything. And apparently, if you question the process or ask just who will replace this failed MEC, you get labeled as a “TA1 lover”. Are we in grade school?

A once strong union has found the lowest common denominator, it seems - mob rules, zero context, and entitlement. Enjoy the 5%, I predict that all we’ll see for a while.

As for reps on deck, buyer beware and check the credentials carefully. That is if they have the respect for the pilots to publicly announce their willingness to serve.
That’s kind of the point. Aside from the folks who have made a career of ALPA politics, you’re not going to know these folks in a council as large as C5.
ThumbsUp is offline  
Old 11-18-2022, 05:20 AM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Position: 787 FO
Posts: 704
Default

Originally Posted by awax
I was asking this question over the summer, and my conclusion is that this reaction to TA1 is all anger - no plan forward.
I guess you don't like democratic governance, accountability and elections. Apparently you prefer autocratic rule like Todd and the Toddlers who gave us TA1. Fortunately, 94% of pilots disagree with you on TA1 and the majority wrt recalls.
jerryleber is online now  
Old 11-18-2022, 05:27 AM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,143
Default

Originally Posted by jerryleber
I guess you don't like democratic governance, accountability and elections. Apparently you prefer autocratic rule like Todd and the Toddlers who gave us TA1. Fortunately, 94% of pilots disagree with you on TA1 and the majority wrt recalls.
outstanding reply. Those who brought us this garbage TA simply don’t get it.
Guppydriver95 is offline  
Old 11-18-2022, 07:26 AM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Chowdah's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Posts: 225
Default

Originally Posted by jerryleber
I guess you don't like democratic governance, accountability and elections. Apparently you prefer autocratic rule like Todd and the Toddlers who gave us TA1. Fortunately, 94% of pilots disagree with you on TA1 and the majority wrt recalls.
The fact that when replying to Awax’s post, you took the time to delete the other part of his post which explicitly answers the above question is insulting to anyone reading this thread’s intelligence.

Your aim to straw man and fight any bit of nuanced position with accusations is so thinly veiled, I honestly wonder if you understand that you’re probably doing your cause disservice.
Chowdah is offline  
Old 11-18-2022, 07:28 AM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Position: 787 FO
Posts: 704
Default

Originally Posted by Chowdah
I honestly wonder if you understand that you’re probably doing your cause disservice.
What cause is that? Too funny.
jerryleber is online now  
Old 11-18-2022, 07:51 AM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 125
Default

Originally Posted by jerryleber
I guess you don't like democratic governance, accountability and elections. Apparently you prefer autocratic rule like Todd and the Toddlers who gave us TA1. Fortunately, 94% of pilots disagree with you on TA1 and the majority wrt recalls.
You literally just proved awax whole point. I guess if one asked a reasonable question you are part of the 6%, love Todd, and love autocrats? Is that correct? SMH.
EwrRocks is offline  
Old 11-18-2022, 08:08 AM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Position: 787 FO
Posts: 704
Default

Originally Posted by EwrRocks
You literally just proved awax whole point.
Not at all because AWAX's premise is absurd because recalls are followed by elections that are not hostage to someone's 'plan'. The pilots decide who is the best candidate. The majority rules. If we were to follow your nonsensical protestations we would never recall anyone no matter how corrupt because elections by their very nature are the antithesis of a plan. Again, that is the nonsense that leads to autocracy that the pilots have almost unanimously rejected. Sorry you all lost your ALPA Int'l meal ticket. Enjoy flying the line.
jerryleber is online now  
Old 11-18-2022, 08:42 AM
  #78  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: 756 Left Side
Posts: 1,629
Default

Originally Posted by awax
I was asking this question over the summer, and my conclusion is that this reaction to TA1 is all anger - no plan forward.

The anger crowd seems to believe that remove and replace will fix everything. And apparently, if you question the process or ask just who will replace this failed MEC, you get labeled as a “TA1 lover”. Are we in grade school?

A once strong union has found the lowest common denominator, it seems - mob rules, zero context, and entitlement. Enjoy the 5%, I predict that all we’ll see for a while.

As for reps on deck, buyer beware and check the credentials carefully. That is if they have the respect for the pilots to publicly announce their willingness to serve.
We will agree to disagree.
There was no doubt in my mind that we needed change. You are semi right- no one came out and said "Lets Recall and then Elect me!"
But should they?

I threw my name in the hat for SecTreas after the recall.. but I also did it with the intent that I would serve as Interim if, and only if no one else stepped up.
SS stepped up (also) and he ran a great meeting for the Interim Rep election. He was elected ST and that was good for this pilot group.
We had a few people willing to run and now with full elections in swing, there are a few more (myself included).

Most of us get it. Unionism is Hard. Being a volunteer is Harder and I would imagine that being a Rep is Even Harder.

But to say that it's better to stay with the current crop of individuals (back in the summer) who led us down this road, is acceptable. Agree to disagree.

Always
Motch
horrido27 is offline  
Old 11-18-2022, 11:07 AM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hummingbear's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,361
Default

Originally Posted by awax
I was asking this question over the summer, and my conclusion is that this reaction to TA1 is all anger - no plan forward.

The anger crowd seems to believe that remove and replace will fix everything. And apparently, if you question the process or ask just who will replace this failed MEC, you get labeled as a “TA1 lover”. Are we in grade school?
In my opinion, the “grade school” mentality is this idea that you can’t make a present decision without having 100% assurance of what its future outcomes will be. Real life requires us to make choices based on our best assessment of the limited information we have available. This is particularly true in representative systems where we only control our own vote & ultimately have to abide by the sometimes contrary voice of the majority. Recalls trigger elections in which we will be tasked collectively with making informed & responsible choices. What’s so hard to understand about that?

Recalling reps is about holding them accountable for their failure to do their most fundamental duty- represent our interests to the company above all else. It takes them out of positions from which they’ve caused us harm & creates consistency of expectations for future reps. It also begins the hard work of electing their replacements & fixing systems of apathy in which we allowed this failure to occur. It is a long process & success is not guaranteed; but that alone isn’t sufficient reason to maintain the status quo. The recent question our pilots have had to ask themselves is whether that hard work & uncertainty is better than sticking with the “devil we know”. For the most part, the majority answer has been “yes”.
hummingbear is offline  
Old 11-18-2022, 01:46 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,049
Default

Originally Posted by Otterbox
Unfortunately unspent money doesn’t get passed on when the employee and eligible spouse die. It goes back to the company.
Sorry but that is completely wrong.

“upon the death of the pilot, the funds in the RHA/VEBA can only be used by the surviving spouse and dependent children. If there is not a surviving spouse or there are no eligible dependents, remaining money in the pilot’s RHA/VEBA account is lost and reallocated to current RHA/VEBA plan participants. “
UALinIAH is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rama04
Regional
9
12-06-2012 08:57 AM
Pilot36
Pilot Health
7
05-31-2012 10:12 AM
fdxdispatchguy
Cargo
28
10-19-2011 03:37 PM
Delta102
Hangar Talk
0
11-23-2005 02:12 PM
Delta102
Hangar Talk
0
11-23-2005 02:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices