Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
209 Unfilled Captain bids >

209 Unfilled Captain bids

Search

Notices

209 Unfilled Captain bids

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-23-2022, 06:47 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,920
Default

Originally Posted by Tesla S
Maybe add a Guam-like stipend for SFO. An extra 3k per month would fill 95% of the vacancies in that base.
Yeah, and that'll go over like a fart in church. What about the people who have had to endure EWR base for years?
nene is offline  
Old 09-23-2022, 06:55 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

Originally Posted by 01110011
Did you fail to read the portion where I said “there is plenty to fight for in a new UPA?” If you’ve read more than that single post from me you’d find I’m hardly a sunshine and rainbows guy, but I’m not going to pretend NB mainline schedules are anything close to the ****show express was.

Don’t mistake gratitude for being out of the express dumpster fire for resignation/acceptance at some of the abysmal QOL portions of the UPA.

It is possible to not be totally miserable at work and still want to fight for improvements.
I think you hit the nail on the head here, and the sentiment you espouse is the one I have heard most on the line versus what I hear on the forum. Let's not stop working for improvements, but let's also not forget where we have been as pawns of the industry.

Originally Posted by ERAUAV8TR
Pay is the problem period
Originally Posted by Wilfortina
Most disagree.
I started a discussion on the .info forum asking the very specific question as to whether it was money or schedule that kept pilots from going to junior NB CA. Everyone on that forum agreed that for the right price they would be willing to put up with the crappy NB CA schedule, but the current rates were no where near what was needed. I see this as a genuine problem for all airlines. I asked about unfilled vacancies on the APC Delta and American forum as well and it is clear it's happening almost everywhere, including JetBlue. Seems junior folk, most of whom have spent a decade or more at regionals or in the military are rightfully wanting some decent QOL at this stage in their career or they want to be compensated for taking a QOL hit.

Bottom line I think it's the schedules that keep people from bidding, but money COULD solve the problem without changing schedules.
Sunvox is offline  
Old 09-23-2022, 07:29 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,090
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox
I think you hit the nail on the head here, and the sentiment you espouse is the one I have heard most on the line versus what I hear on the forum. Let's not stop working for improvements, but let's also not forget where we have been as pawns of the industry.





I started a discussion on the .info forum asking the very specific question as to whether it was money or schedule that kept pilots from going to junior NB CA. Everyone on that forum agreed that for the right price they would be willing to put up with the crappy NB CA schedule, but the current rates were no where near what was needed. I see this as a genuine problem for all airlines. I asked about unfilled vacancies on the APC Delta and American forum as well and it is clear it's happening almost everywhere, including JetBlue. Seems junior folk, most of whom have spent a decade or more at regionals or in the military are rightfully wanting some decent QOL at this stage in their career or they want to be compensated for taking a QOL hit.

Bottom line I think it's the schedules that keep people from bidding, but money COULD solve the problem without changing schedules.
you mean everyone has a price
TFAYD is offline  
Old 09-23-2022, 07:34 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,049
Default

Originally Posted by TFAYD
you mean everyone has a price
January proved that lol. Flights cancelling because people where burned out and 100% just wasn’t enough. Now for 200% add pay, well the trips go covered lol.
UALinIAH is offline  
Old 09-23-2022, 07:40 AM
  #55  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 56
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox

Bottom line I think it's the schedules that keep people from bidding, but money COULD solve the problem without changing schedules.

I’m not sure how one could determine this, but I would like to see a breakdown of the QOL camp vs Pay camp. I know it’s not an either/or argument. It’s a balancing act. Everyone is on a spectrum. I for one, am on the far end of the QOL spectrum. With young kids at home, you couldn’t pay me enough to upgrade (within reasonable expectations at least). I know quite a few people like me, but also see many who are happy spending their life at work making tons of money and are on the far end of the Pay spectrum.
SwampFoxx is offline  
Old 09-23-2022, 08:25 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 812
Default

We have allowed the airline to squeeze more production out of every pilot. Less reserves, lines built to high 80s, captain reserves being understaffed so flying every day or being assigned sc/fsb for shorter callout times, pool display that is rigged so no trading... CA reserves aren't being treated well and you are on drugs if you think they will make better announcements for some bs metric that management manufactured.
Aquaticus is offline  
Old 09-23-2022, 09:00 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hummingbear's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,361
Default

Originally Posted by SwampFoxx
I’m not sure how one could determine this, but I would like to see a breakdown of the QOL camp vs Pay camp. I know it’s not an either/or argument. It’s a balancing act. Everyone is on a spectrum. I for one, am on the far end of the QOL spectrum. With young kids at home, you couldn’t pay me enough to upgrade (within reasonable expectations at least). I know quite a few people like me, but also see many who are happy spending their life at work making tons of money and are on the far end of the Pay spectrum.
The trick is, you’re almost always going to take a QOL hit to upgrade. Even if you improve QOL issues, any individual is going to have a better QOL in a junior BES than a more senior one. A pure QOL guy is not going to upgrade even if all the current QOL issues are addressed because his relative seniority (and therefore QOL) will still be better in the right seat than the left.

Having said that, I agree it’s a spectrum & it’s sort of asinine to break it into either/or. Yes, we all have a price, and that price gets lower the better the lifestyle the assignment offers. The solution is a combination of pay & QOL; and there are any number of ways those two elements could be blended together to make it work.
hummingbear is offline  
Old 09-23-2022, 09:27 AM
  #58  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 18
Default

Originally Posted by Tesla S
Maybe add a Guam-like stipend for SFO An extra 3k per month would fill 95% of the vacancies in that base.
+ LAX and EWR and you have a plan.
Aztecsfight is offline  
Old 09-23-2022, 10:56 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Posts: 511
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
Really? I’ve flown 5 days of 100%PP in the last 7 days and already there was a 100% 2 day for tomorrow I could have grabbed if I wanted.
Yeah really.

Not sure which base you're in but sure as hell ain't any in IAH 737.
Knotcher is online now  
Old 09-23-2022, 01:41 PM
  #60  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 56
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear

Having said that, I agree it’s a spectrum & it’s sort of asinine to break it into either/or. Yes, we all have a price, and that price gets lower the better the lifestyle the assignment offers. The solution is a combination of pay & QOL; and there are any number of ways those two elements could be blended together to make it work.
I guess what I was getting at is where at on that spectrum do the majority of pilots reside? Closer towards the QOL side or “squeeze every drop out of me you want as long as you show me the money” side? You can tell my bias in how I phrase the question. I see several posts, as the one earlier in this thread, that claim that the only solution needed is to throw money at us and the problem will be solved. I’m just one guy saying that won’t work for me. I believe those people and myself are on two opposite ends of the spectrum. I’m curious where the average is. This pathetic, insulting TA (can’t help but to disparage it every time I mention it) seemed to lean towards the money makers. It provided more ways for the company to use and abuse you and justified it by offering add pay. Was the overwhelmingly negative response because pilots value QOL items more or because the carrot wasn’t big enough. As you said, for most people the answer is both. For me the answer is you don’t have a big enough carrot to ever get me to accept a career where I’m only home 8 - 10 days a month. Am I in the majority or minority? Forgive my asaninity
SwampFoxx is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gooselives
United
32
09-25-2022 09:13 PM
SoCalGuy
United
178
05-19-2019 04:13 AM
FUPM
Atlas/Polar
71
09-26-2017 03:11 PM
Fresh
United
120
04-18-2015 09:52 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices