LC 57 Meeting
#11
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 56
One voted to shut down the membership vote and keep the same NC. Enough reason to be recalled not to mention the dirty politics used to cling to his position. The other didn’t get a vote on sending out the TA, but I suppose you can take his word for it that he personally voted no. His running for CA rep after being recalled from his other position showed how desperate he was to keep his job and how out of touch he is. 99% chance he throws his name in the hat again for the permanent election.
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 859
Uh Johnson Voted no. Wenzel has no votes. I’m not saying anything about their fitness, it’s just funny people think this is about the TA. The people calling for heads to roll in C5 are the same people who were anti loa 20-05, etc etc. many of them are jaded former reps themselves, or fired committee members. It’s like watching the graveyard come alive and zombies crawl out of the muck.
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,049
Uh Johnson Voted no. Wenzel has no votes. I’m not saying anything about their fitness, it’s just funny people think this is about the TA. The people calling for heads to roll in C5 are the same people who were anti loa 20-05, etc etc. many of them are jaded former reps themselves, or fired committee members. It’s like watching the graveyard come alive and zombies crawl out of the muck.
You know all that though.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,525
You hit the nail on the head there.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,525
No, just the noisy chest thumpers looking to fill the voids. Seemingly these are the same LOA 20-05 no voters. Need some fresh clear-headed people in these positions, not career ALPA-ists or hotheads.
Last edited by ThumbsUp; 10-03-2022 at 08:06 PM.
#20
While I’m glad that the recall effort is continuing on the right path, those numbers are closer than I would have expected. It is hard to believe there are that many pilots that are content with how they’ve been represented and treated by their LEC. I just don’t understand it. What would an LEC have to do to turn those guys against it?! I’m not sure this sends the same fear inducing message to the rest of the YES voters that C5 did. Hopefully the other council recalls see better margins.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post