Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Kirby: Pilots Overstaffed by 10% >

Kirby: Pilots Overstaffed by 10%

Search

Notices

Kirby: Pilots Overstaffed by 10%

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-2022, 08:34 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,264
Default

I’ve made this point on other threads here before. Given that the TA could be described as near-concessionary in that it doesn’t make UAL more appealing as a destination airline in the pilot hiring market place - if anything, if the TA is ratified it makes UAL less appealing - it appears that Kirby is not simply bluffing when he described UAL as overstaffed.

The TA indicates that Kirby doesn’t see a problem going forward with pilot supply. If he did, a rational response would have been to create an incentive for pilot applicants to favor UAL in the pilot hiring market place by incentivizing them with superior pay, retirement, work rules, etc. But Kirby didn’t do that.

Maybe the idea of a pilot shortage isn’t really as critical of an issue in the eyes of airline management as pilots would like to believe it is. Maybe the idea of a pilot shortage doesn’t generate fear for Kirby. Maybe it’s not the leverage pilots think it is.

So, what’s plan B if that is, in fact, the case? What’s the leverage for UAL’s pilot group? More than four years without filing for mediation means the credible threat of self help is years away. How is the UAL pilot group planning to apply leverage to Kirby going forward assuming the TA fails?
Lewbronski is offline  
Old 07-12-2022, 08:40 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Position: 787 FO
Posts: 634
Default

Originally Posted by Round Luggage
A lot of you bought into Kirby.
Kirby is VERY good at what he does and this TA is proving it again. It is our union and we who are failing.
jerryleber is offline  
Old 07-12-2022, 08:40 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 432
Default

If I’m already getting constant reassignments and rolled days off when the airline is “10% overstaffed” I hate to see what things are going to look like when we’re taking delivery of a new narrowbody every other day. Would be nice to have some limits on how often the company can roll you into staying on the road another day as a lineholder.
01110011 is offline  
Old 07-12-2022, 08:42 AM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2021
Posts: 54
Default

Originally Posted by Lewbronski
I’ve made this point on other threads here before. Given that the TA could be described as near-concessionary in that it doesn’t make UAL more appealing as a destination airline in the pilot hiring market place - if anything, if the TA is ratified it makes UAL less appealing - it appears that Kirby is not simply bluffing when he described UAL as overstaffed.

The TA indicates that Kirby doesn’t see a problem going forward with pilot supply. If he did, a rational response would have been to create an incentive for pilot applicants to favor UAL in the pilot hiring market place by incentivizing them with superior pay, retirement, work rules, etc. But Kirby didn’t do that.

Maybe the idea of a pilot shortage isn’t really as critical of an issue in the eyes of airline management as pilots would like to believe it is. Maybe the idea of a pilot shortage doesn’t generate fear for Kirby. Maybe it’s not the leverage pilots think it is.

So, what’s plan B if that is, in fact, the case? What’s the leverage for UAL’s pilot group? More than four years without filing for mediation means the credible threat of self help is years away. How is the UAL pilot group planning to apply leverage to Kirby going forward assuming the TA fails?

I don’t buy it. The numbers support a huge hiring wave and a shortage coming up. Hence the starting their own flight schools and flow programs. This is a standard negotiating tactic. Ask for something super low and then pretend to meet you in the middle because they know what pilots are asking for. They’re hoping pilots will give in and think we actually don’t have the leverage. Look at how much they are currently still hiring but they over staffed ?! BS.
Ryder1587 is offline  
Old 07-12-2022, 09:00 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 255
Default

Mandatory retirements alone would fix any overstaffing.
Mudge is offline  
Old 07-12-2022, 09:01 AM
  #16  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,115
Default

Originally Posted by Lewbronski
I’ve made this point on other threads here before. Given that the TA could be described as near-concessionary in that it doesn’t make UAL more appealing as a destination airline in the pilot hiring market place - if anything, if the TA is ratified it makes UAL less appealing - it appears that Kirby is not simply bluffing when he described UAL as overstaffed.

The TA indicates that Kirby doesn’t see a problem going forward with pilot supply. If he did, a rational response would have been to create an incentive for pilot applicants to favor UAL in the pilot hiring market place by incentivizing them with superior pay, retirement, work rules, etc. But Kirby didn’t do that.

Maybe the idea of a pilot shortage isn’t really as critical of an issue in the eyes of airline management as pilots would like to believe it is. Maybe the idea of a pilot shortage doesn’t generate fear for Kirby. Maybe it’s not the leverage pilots think it is.

So, what’s plan B if that is, in fact, the case? What’s the leverage for UAL’s pilot group? More than four years without filing for mediation means the credible threat of self help is years away. How is the UAL pilot group planning to apply leverage to Kirby going forward assuming the TA fails?
It’s pattern bargaining. The first major to actually grant the QOL and pay scale concessions that are ultimately going to be required IN THIS MARKET is going to set the standard for the whole industry. Similarly, if any management group can low ball the market and get inflation neutral or - from their perspective better yet - a concessionary CBA, it too sets the standard for the whole industry.

Kirby tried to force the issue with scope and continuing what amounts to selling United pilot flying to the lowest bidder and it didn’t work out. But if he can convince enough Nervous Nellies like you that he can threaten their jobs, he can get them to take real wage cuts and real QOL losses just by jawboning. Why on earth wouldn’t he try it.

An even better question, why on earth would you fall for it? ATP number demographics and mandatory retirement numbers are a matter of puckish record. Ten minutes worth of googling would show you that. Try a little research next time you are in a hotel room someplace, rather than doing 16 oz forearm curls in the hotel bar and you’ll be able to see that for yourself.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 07-12-2022, 09:08 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Position: 787 FO
Posts: 634
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
It’s pattern bargaining. The first major to actually grant the QOL and pay scale concessions that are ultimately going to be required IN THIS MARKET is going to set the standard for the whole industry. Similarly, if any management group can low ball the market and get inflation neutral or - from their perspective better yet - a concessionary CBA, it too sets the standard for the whole industry.
Exactly and it was no accident that the airlines picked the United pilot contract to lead the pattern this time. They knew our union leadership was compromised and this TA proves they were right.
jerryleber is offline  
Old 07-12-2022, 09:15 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Position: Pilot
Posts: 531
Default

Perhaps not all airline CEOs are liars.

Kirby is a dishonest liar. Chronically.

He probably won a few hundred more yes votes. It’s easy to scare pilots into thinking their jobs are at risk.
AntiPeter is offline  
Old 07-12-2022, 09:26 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,961
Default

Originally Posted by AntiPeter
Perhaps not all airline CEOs are liars.

Kirby is a dishonest liar. Chronically.

He probably won a few hundred more yes votes. It’s easy to scare pilots into thinking their jobs are at risk.
The only people whose jobs are allegedly at risk can’t vote. If UA was 10% over staffed, hiring would slow down. A friend is in a BI class starting today… so this isn’t quite the case. There’s still that 100+ planes they’re planning on taking in 2023.
Otterbox is offline  
Old 07-12-2022, 10:13 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,264
Default

Originally Posted by Ryder1587
I don’t buy it. The numbers support a huge hiring wave and a shortage coming up. Hence the starting their own flight schools and flow programs. This is a standard negotiating tactic. Ask for something super low and then pretend to meet you in the middle because they know what pilots are asking for. They’re hoping pilots will give in and think we actually don’t have the leverage. Look at how much they are currently still hiring but they over staffed ?! BS.
My point is that it's possible that the idea of a pilot shortage is not a real issue in the eyes of airline executives like Kirby. I'm not saying that it's definitely not an issue. But I'm also saying that maybe pilots are putting all their cards on it when it doesn't really create that much leverage.

Prudence dictates having a back up plan. For example, a back up plan could have been, for example, filing for mediation 3.5 years ago in order to start the clock on developing leverage under the RLA while still planning to use the possible pilot shortage as the main line of attack. Had the pilot shortage not been enough to pressure management into conceding to substantial gains, UAL ALPA would have had a very strong back up plan already in place and fully mature. But they didn't.

Therefore, UAL ALPA (hopefully, an entirely new MEC, NC, and executive team) needs to do something very different after the TA fails - if it fails. They need to begin implementing a Plan B. They need to be smart whereas up to now they've demonstrated incompetence. And they need to be aggressive whereas up to now they've demonstrated passivity. A first step would be to file for mediation as soon as is possible after forming a new team. Then, they need to conduct a strike authorization vote that results in an overwhelming vote to authorize a strike in order to send a strong message to Kirby that the new team is very different than the old one and that the pilot group is united in their intent to go as far as is necessary to achieve gains. That will likely require a thorough messaging campaign so that pilots understand what conducting a strike authorization vote soon after filing for mediation means. It doesn't mean they're going on strike any time soon. That couldn't happen for at least two to three years after filing for mediation. It's all about communicating a message to Kirby.

Then, they need to begin massive and frequent informational pickets. That would be a good start. Hopefully, Kirby will realize what faces him in two to three years if he allows the situation to fester and he will be in more of a mood to truly bargain today as a result.

But if UAL ALPA continues with the same people on the same path, expect more of the same concessionary results.
Lewbronski is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flogger
GoJet
41
10-01-2022 06:29 PM
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
ERJ135
American
26
02-26-2013 05:54 PM
bgmann
Regional
31
11-19-2011 07:33 PM
John Pennekamp
Major
28
02-13-2007 01:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices