Search

Notices

TA2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-2022, 01:23 PM
  #51  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Posts: 2
Default

I’ll sit reserve at 0600….in TPA or MCO! If the next TA is to pass, just require them to open a MCO domicile, 99% yes 😂.
Frank Drebin is offline  
Old 07-03-2022, 03:03 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 963
Default

Originally Posted by DashTrash
I agree with almost everything that you said. I would add that the min day should go up (Delta’s is 5:15/day average). Our five hours has been stagnant since the JCBA at least. Reserves shouldn’t have a blanket guarantee. That guarantee should be divided into credit per day, and a reserve pilot should accrue that credit per day or a trip whichever is greater.

As for the before 10:00 thing…. If the Company wants it so bad, then pony up!!! Give the reserve pilot a choice. Either take the add pay, or if you commute, then you get POS and a hotel.
Might not be so bad if we actually go to 15 reserve days. But if they actually "pony up" then it can be optional. There's no way a 12/13 day off guy should be checking in and possibly commuting on days off.
fadec is offline  
Old 07-03-2022, 03:42 PM
  #53  
Ben Salley
 
A320fumes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Left
Posts: 924
Default

Careful about negotiating specifics on this board.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
A320fumes is offline  
Old 07-03-2022, 04:10 PM
  #54  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Posts: 82
Default

Originally Posted by A320fumes
Careful about negotiating specifics on this board.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Somebody has to. The MEC certainly is not.
UnableVNAVPTH is offline  
Old 07-03-2022, 06:02 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by A320fumes
Careful about negotiating specifics on this board.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Consider it polling.
Andy is offline  
Old 07-03-2022, 06:03 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by A320fumes
Careful about negotiating specifics on this board.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Seriously?
Riverside is offline  
Old 07-03-2022, 06:08 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by StewBlu
I don’t disagree entirely that some of these folks are out of touch. However, we have to be careful about losing the institutional knowledge that they have as a consequence of being in their roles for as long as they have.
There is negative value in the NC and Brad Hunnewell's institutional knowledge. We need pilots who have flown the line for a long time on the NC, not career cube workers.
Andy is offline  
Old 07-03-2022, 06:09 PM
  #58  
Ben Salley
 
A320fumes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Left
Posts: 924
Default

Originally Posted by Riverside
Seriously?

Absolutely. In this thread I’ve seen several very specific wants noted. You never want them to know your specific price. The overall dissatisfaction is healthy, but be cautious/quiet about your specific wants…


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
A320fumes is offline  
Old 07-03-2022, 06:13 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by A320fumes
Absolutely. In this thread I’ve seen several very specific wants noted. You never want them to know your specific price. The overall dissatisfaction is healthy, but be cautious/quiet about your specific wants…


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Your point of view is exactly why we ended up with this TA. I have zero problems with transparency on what we demand.
Andy is offline  
Old 07-03-2022, 06:15 PM
  #60  
Ben Salley
 
A320fumes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Left
Posts: 924
Default

Originally Posted by DashTrash
So here’s an interesting tidbit from the past when DeltaS had their TA in 2015 that failed.

DELTA TA – The DAL MEC accepted a tentative agreement (TA) by a senatorial vote of 11-8. The TA is now out for DAL membership ratification. Voting ends and the results will be disclosed on July 10.



After weighing the pros and cons of the TA, it is difficult to say if it actually moves the bar any higher. Instead, a compelling argument can be made that the bar will be lowered because the TA is rife with concessions in quality of life (QOL), healthcare, and possibly even job security. It might be a reasonable agreement if just the profit sharing formula was traded for higher hourly rates, but it is self-evident that far more than that was sold.



During this time of unprecedented airline profitability, it is puzzling why the DAL MEC opened early to only settle for a cost-neutral contract at best. There are valid arguments about the time value of money. However, these can be countered with equally valid arguments on the value of job security and QOL. The UAL MEC aims to get a briefing from the DAL Negotiating Committee if the TA passes membership ratification.

This is what our MEC Vice-Chairman said, when he was the Council 34 Vice-Chairman.

They actually gave up their rolling sick bank in that TA. My feeling was that the DAL Pilots knew that value by comparing what we lack at UAL. Also, political shift from DAL to NWA at that time.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
A320fumes is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MatthewAMEL
Southwest
19
11-17-2016 10:57 AM
Sr. Barco
Southwest
43
02-03-2016 08:41 PM
MikeF16
Delta
179
02-03-2016 08:22 PM
capncrunch
Delta
3
08-25-2015 03:46 PM
Pinchanickled
Regional
12
01-03-2011 05:16 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices