Giving the MEC direction
#11
Leverage. It’s a beautiful thing, especially in negotiations. It’s purchasing power. We have it. Why would we sit across the table and allow the Company to dictate to our negotiating team when we hold the upper hand. Seems we still have a lot of folks who are confused or think we should let the Company command the negotiations in a time when we have unprecedented leverage.
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,039
Also above, it’s not just untriggered reassignments losing 125%, personally it’s more about moving reassigning a LH to step 2 for untriggered from step 5. LH reassigned on leg 1 before even looking for a reserve or offering SRM is a HUGE give. I want every safeguard in place to keep me on the line I was awarded in seniority order. I actually want it more difficult to reassign not less. The 125% was just a nice way of lubing me up before I got bent over.
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Position: B777 CA
Posts: 753
How about the fact the DAL gets a full retirement on day 1 of LTD (32% at 50% pay NO CAP) vs we get 16% after 36 months. Plus due to our CAP and NO CAP at DAL many UAL pilots will get less then a true 16% retirement due to CAP.
Let me repeat - DAL gets full retirement on day 1 of LTD - me United Pilots get 50% of retirement after 36 months in LTD. WTF!
Let me repeat - DAL gets full retirement on day 1 of LTD - me United Pilots get 50% of retirement after 36 months in LTD. WTF!
#14
How about the fact the DAL gets a full retirement on day 1 of LTD (32% at 50% pay NO CAP) vs we get 16% after 36 months. Plus due to our CAP and NO CAP at DAL many UAL pilots will get less then a true 16% retirement due to CAP.
Let me repeat - DAL gets full retirement on day 1 of LTD - me United Pilots get 50% of retirement after 36 months in LTD. WTF!
Let me repeat - DAL gets full retirement on day 1 of LTD - me United Pilots get 50% of retirement after 36 months in LTD. WTF!
Would you prefer a higher hourly wage so that you can purchase your own policy outside United? Or perhaps a UAL “sponsored” insurance option that was pretax?
#15
Also above, it’s not just untriggered reassignments losing 125%, personally it’s more about moving reassigning a LH to step 2 for untriggered from step 5. LH reassigned on leg 1 before even looking for a reserve or offering SRM is a HUGE give. I want every safeguard in place to keep me on the line I was awarded in seniority order. I actually want it more difficult to reassign not less. The 125% was just a nice way of lubing me up before I got bent over.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Position: B777 CA
Posts: 753
That would absolutely be a win. I suppose the question is where that lies on our collective priority list. It didn’t get decreased in this (or likely subsequent) TAs, so how badly do we want this?
Would you prefer a higher hourly wage so that you can purchase your own policy outside United? Or perhaps a UAL “sponsored” insurance option that was pretax?
Would you prefer a higher hourly wage so that you can purchase your own policy outside United? Or perhaps a UAL “sponsored” insurance option that was pretax?
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 255
Also above, it’s not just untriggered reassignments losing 125%, personally it’s more about moving reassigning a LH to step 2 for untriggered from step 5. LH reassigned on leg 1 before even looking for a reserve or offering SRM is a HUGE give. I want every safeguard in place to keep me on the line I was awarded in seniority order. I actually want it more difficult to reassign not less. The 125% was just a nice way of lubing me up before I got bent over.
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,961
So you are saying they didn’t get the best deal they could as the ones sitting across the table? You know that the Negotiators could have gotten more?
I love that many pilots think that every thing in a contract is a separate item to be negotiated with no mixing of other stuff. Believe me I’d love it if that was the case. But a gain in one area means you don’t always get as much in another area. The totality of the contract is not negotiated in vacuum.
I haven’t decided my vote because I haven’t looked at any of the documents yet other than the initial TA announcement email from last Friday. I wanted to watch all the Town Hall information videos then read the full document based on hearing from the negotiators. Then I could read and make an informed and hopefully non-emotional decision.
I love that many pilots think that every thing in a contract is a separate item to be negotiated with no mixing of other stuff. Believe me I’d love it if that was the case. But a gain in one area means you don’t always get as much in another area. The totality of the contract is not negotiated in vacuum.
I haven’t decided my vote because I haven’t looked at any of the documents yet other than the initial TA announcement email from last Friday. I wanted to watch all the Town Hall information videos then read the full document based on hearing from the negotiators. Then I could read and make an informed and hopefully non-emotional decision.
Thie UPA TA is concessionary and hurts pattern bargaining. It’s so far from industry leading that the legacy with the worst pilot contract and management group got a better offer less than a week later and the MEC immediately stops supporting the TA town halls and Q&A. That in itself is incredible and telling that this TA needs to be voted no on so the company can be re-engaged and get a better offer.
Voting hasn’t even closed and the value of the TA has been surpassed by hundreds of millions of dollars. Anything other than a no vote sets UAL pilots up for a substandard contract for the next decade.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post