Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United MEC announces suspension of TA Activit >

United MEC announces suspension of TA Activit

Search

Notices

United MEC announces suspension of TA Activit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2022, 06:41 AM
  #51  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Posts: 184
Default

Originally Posted by Chowdah
I was on the fence, ended up being a no vote due to scope changes and what I felt was pretty loose contractual language that basically allowed to company discretion over some of our “gains.”

I’m personally not on the pitchfork/recall bandwagon, I know a lot of these reps are good people who fly the line quite a bit and made a bad choice. That said, if they agree to suspend the vote, I will absolutely be on the recall/replace train. The vote is all about accountability and sending a message that the Four full-timers need to be flushed
I don’t think they can suspend the vote. One of the PDR guys (waaay smarter than me) with a law degree checked the policy manual and he said they can’t stop it.
AlettaOcean is offline  
Old 07-01-2022, 06:42 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SFO Guppy CA
Posts: 1,112
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotdude3407
No…well not like is being suggested.

Per the C&BL, a membership ratification will remain active unless superseded by another ballot.

The actual language: “Once membership ratification is established it will remain in effect until changed by another ballot of the membership through MEC action."

In other words, only another TA could kill this one. Given the magnitude of negativity, I wouldn’t think another one would even be discussed in that short amount of time. This MEC needs to run another poll, regroup (assuming recalls don’t happen), make another plan and go execute it. That can’t happen in the time left to vote.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, I believe that you are correct!!! The current TA cannot be withdrawn because the Company could make a complaint that the Association is negotiating in bad faith. That is something that we definitely do not want to be labeled with!!! My understanding of the RLA is that this has to run its course (unless superseded by another TA). Which is actually what I really want because this TA is lacking in so many other areas, which the AA TA does not address.

We (the membership) need to do some house cleaning and get the representatives that have been institutionalized out of ALPA office. They all need to go back to the line and learn how to fly again!!! Get an untriggered reassignment, have their overnights changed, have an overnight that was a long overnight changed to a short overnight because of delays, etc. Basically have a dose of reality!!!
DashTrash is offline  
Old 07-01-2022, 06:45 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,118
Default

Originally Posted by AlettaOcean
Kirby was former AA. There is animosity between AA and UA top executives.

The AA offer was a big FOOK YOU! from Isom to Kirby.
And kirby clearly wanted this to pass before the Q2 earnings report to lock in cheap labor and/or secure financing for his next order. Isom just torpedoed that opportunity.
threeighteen is offline  
Old 07-01-2022, 06:49 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 138
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Crewdog
Share and enjoy
Steve -

With all due respect, it should say

TUMI
TA

With the big 'DO NOT' symbol over both words.

I won't trademark it out of respect for the brotherhood and to help fight the good fight.
That Guy 74 is offline  
Old 07-01-2022, 06:52 AM
  #55  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Posts: 184
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen
And kirby clearly wanted this to pass before the Q2 earnings report to lock in cheap labor and/or secure financing for his next order. Isom just torpedoed that opportunity.
Exactly.

Which begs the question: After 3.5 years, why were Hamilton and the MEC so eager to get this done 4 DAYS PRIOR to record Q2 results?

It’s corruption, plain and simple.
AlettaOcean is offline  
Old 07-01-2022, 06:55 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 501
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
This is their out. They'll likely cancel before the vote closes, saying something like AA's is superior.
It will be interesting if this happens. I’m not sure how they will backpedal “this is the right deal at the right time.”

Someone correct me if I’m wrong here, but our TA is worth $1.2b over two years and AA’s is over $2b over the same timeframe?
Barley is offline  
Old 07-01-2022, 07:07 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NuGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,903
Default

Originally Posted by AlettaOcean
I don’t think they can suspend the vote. One of the PDR guys (waaay smarter than me) with a law degree checked the policy manual and he said they can’t stop it.
Policy manuals can be overridden with a 2/3s vote of the MEC.
NuGuy is offline  
Old 07-01-2022, 07:15 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 963
Default

Management negotiated this in good faith. If the MEC pulls the vote, is that good faith on our part? Is it good faith to pull a deal based on pay rumors from AA management with no contract language to back it up? Suppose they pull the deal and go into mediation. What then? Any mediator in their right mind should impose the TA as it exists currently, or at least use it as a heavily weighted starting point. OTOH if the membership votes it down then we're back to square one and haven't violated expectations on either side.

The MEC must choose their steps very carefully here. Shutting down the vote could have a huge impact on our leverage moving forward.
fadec is offline  
Old 07-01-2022, 07:22 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,118
Default

Originally Posted by fadec
Management negotiated this in good faith. If the MEC pulls the vote, is that good faith on our part? Is it good faith to pull a deal based on pay rumors from AA management with no contract language to back it up? Suppose they pull the deal and go into mediation. What then? Any mediator in their right mind should impose the TA as it exists currently, or at least use it as a heavily weighted starting point. OTOH if the membership votes it down then we're back to square one and haven't violated expectations on either side.

The MEC must choose their steps very carefully here. Shutting down the vote could have a huge impact on our leverage moving forward.
mediators can't impose TAs.
threeighteen is offline  
Old 07-01-2022, 07:23 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SFO Guppy CA
Posts: 1,112
Default

Originally Posted by fadec
Management negotiated this in good faith. If the MEC pulls the vote, is that good faith on our part? Is it good faith to pull a deal based on pay rumors from AA management with no contract language to back it up? Suppose they pull the deal and go into mediation. What then? Any mediator in their right mind should impose the TA as it exists currently, or at least use it as a heavily weighted starting point. OTOH if the membership votes it down then we're back to square one and haven't violated expectations on either side.

The MEC must choose their steps very carefully here. Shutting down the vote could have a huge impact on our leverage moving forward.
THIS^^^^!!!
DashTrash is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Crawl
CommuteAir
5406
03-21-2020 06:45 AM
Rotor2prop
Major
13
07-11-2012 10:55 AM
Regularguy
United
57
03-12-2012 04:46 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
01-07-2006 03:24 PM
Freighter Captain
Major
0
05-10-2005 06:53 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices