Search

Notices

Reserve Rules

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-31-2022, 10:21 AM
  #21  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Position: Power Isosceles
Posts: 119
Default

Originally Posted by C11DCA
Well considering our reserve system isn't based on seniority, hence FIFO, not sure why you expect otherwise.

The unfilleds are due to multiple of reasons, not just Reserve rules:
  • The very real possibility of losing an assigned winter or spring break vacation this year due to training conflicts. Covid restricted travel for two years. Folks want to go on their vacations.
  • The notion that the vacancies will be a perpetual thing so pilots didn't need to bid on them if it didn’t suit them at the time. When one had to wait 20 years to hold Captain, any Captain vacancy even if it meant commuting, was seriously considered, Now that the time to hold Captain is a lot less, there isn't the urgency to grab it ASAP, regardless of domicile.
  • And yes reserve rules. But even if you had the greatest reserve system ever, there would be those who avoid bidding it just because its reserve. They will wait until they can be a solid lineholder. No doubt reserve here could be improved. We used to have FSB lines. Those tended to go senior as you had a set schedule of them, and it paid better then “normal” reserve.
I won't disagree with pretty much anything you said. My issue is the assignments of short calls and FSBs. There appears to be no logic behind most of these assignments (and I'm talking narrowbody basic reserve). For example, CS will place a person in a 6-day silo on a FSB!! That makes absolutely no sense to me. Most FSB assignments are "clean up" activities (ie DH and fly a leg back, etc). And no one can seem to tell me how scheduling decides on which silos to put the SC and FSBs. I know its facetious, but its as if they roll a pair of dice and whatever pops up, that silo get the assignment. I could have just completed a 3-day trip (in a 6-day silo) and have 3 days left. Scheduling puts out a SC in a 3-day silo. Well, if I'm the only one in a 3 day silo, guess who's getting it?!? If I just finished a trip, I don't think I should be getting another assignment right away, but yet it happens all the time. My point is that reserve needs to go back to a seniority based system. Long call and short call lines would be fine by me and the FSBs need to go!!
johnwick is offline  
Old 03-31-2022, 10:31 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2021
Posts: 700
Default

If the goal is to make more money on reserve changing your day off before a reserve block to a VDO can help.
KnightNight is offline  
Old 03-31-2022, 08:21 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mm1989's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: CA
Posts: 309
Default

Originally Posted by johnwick
I won't disagree with pretty much anything you said. My issue is the assignments of short calls and FSBs. There appears to be no logic behind most of these assignments (and I'm talking narrowbody basic reserve). For example, CS will place a person in a 6-day silo on a FSB!! That makes absolutely no sense to me. Most FSB assignments are "clean up" activities (ie DH and fly a leg back, etc). And no one can seem to tell me how scheduling decides on which silos to put the SC and FSBs. I know its facetious, but its as if they roll a pair of dice and whatever pops up, that silo get the assignment. I could have just completed a 3-day trip (in a 6-day silo) and have 3 days left. Scheduling puts out a SC in a 3-day silo. Well, if I'm the only one in a 3 day silo, guess who's getting it?!? If I just finished a trip, I don't think I should be getting another assignment right away, but yet it happens all the time. My point is that reserve needs to go back to a seniority based system. Long call and short call lines would be fine by me and the FSBs need to go!!
This exact thing happened to me 2 weeks ago. 6 day silo and flew a 3 day trip. Days 4 and 5 were both FSB. Luckily day 6 was long call.
mm1989 is offline  
Old 04-02-2022, 08:43 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 655
Default

Originally Posted by johnwick
I won't disagree with pretty much anything you said. My issue is the assignments of short calls and FSBs. There appears to be no logic behind most of these assignments (and I'm talking narrowbody basic reserve). For example, CS will place a person in a 6-day silo on a FSB!! That makes absolutely no sense to me. Most FSB assignments are "clean up" activities (ie DH and fly a leg back, etc). And no one can seem to tell me how scheduling decides on which silos to put the SC and FSBs. I know its facetious, but its as if they roll a pair of dice and whatever pops up, that silo get the assignment. I could have just completed a 3-day trip (in a 6-day silo) and have 3 days left. Scheduling puts out a SC in a 3-day silo. Well, if I'm the only one in a 3 day silo, guess who's getting it?!? If I just finished a trip, I don't think I should be getting another assignment right away, but yet it happens all the time. My point is that reserve needs to go back to a seniority based system. Long call and short call lines would be fine by me and the FSBs need to go!!
the building and assigning of SC/FSB has been an ongoing issue for years. Even with some sort of “matrix” the crew desk is supposed to follow, it still is at their whims of how many and in what silo. So certainly that can be improved drastically.

as far as your example of coming off a trip, and then being assigned something right away, that is just luck of the draw. (Subject to the crew desk intentionally building a 3 day SC just to target you.). But if there aren't any other 3 day pilots available then yes you get assigned it. Beyond UPA or FAR required post flight rest what do you expect? And a seniority based system wouldn't change that potentially happening. Being on reserve means you get 12 days off. That also means one is available for 18 days of being on call/flying. A seniority based system wouldn’t change that either.

Legacy UAL has had a FIFO reserve system going as far back as the 1981 Contract. I didn't look further back then that. And it used to be nothing but short call until the BK contract started the long call/short call system. Want to change that then go through the local council process to give direction to your reps.

please don't take this as a our reserve system is fine….improvements can and should definitely happen.
C11DCA is offline  
Old 04-02-2022, 11:03 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by johnwick
I won't disagree with pretty much anything you said. My issue is the assignments of short calls and FSBs. There appears to be no logic behind most of these assignments (and I'm talking narrowbody basic reserve). For example, CS will place a person in a 6-day silo on a FSB!! That makes absolutely no sense to me. Most FSB assignments are "clean up" activities (ie DH and fly a leg back, etc). And no one can seem to tell me how scheduling decides on which silos to put the SC and FSBs. I know its facetious, but its as if they roll a pair of dice and whatever pops up, that silo get the assignment. I could have just completed a 3-day trip (in a 6-day silo) and have 3 days left. Scheduling puts out a SC in a 3-day silo. Well, if I'm the only one in a 3 day silo, guess who's getting it?!? If I just finished a trip, I don't think I should be getting another assignment right away, but yet it happens all the time. My point is that reserve needs to go back to a seniority based system. Long call and short call lines would be fine by me and the FSBs need to go!!
the main issue is a mismatch or expectations on the pilots part. Somehow folks think that they can be on reserve and shouldn’t be used. That would be nice but the expectation should be to be “on call / duty” every single day.

The cost are just too low for the company to really worry about paying people for some extra short calls. The opportunity costs are just to low if the alternative is a delayed or even cancelled flight. Unless we can make it a lot more expensive to build what we perceive as frivolous SC/FSB assignments they will continue to happen.

from a company perspective the optimal solution is to put everyone to work.
TFAYD is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Colonel S
United
25
05-04-2022 03:46 AM
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
SPM2019
Piedmont Airlines
48
03-14-2019 04:45 PM
bikingflyer
American
12
12-04-2013 12:47 PM
ERJ135
Regional
3
12-21-2005 01:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices