Search

Notices

Max 10

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2022, 03:47 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,123
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
Prior to the crashes both Boeing and Airbus had generated big sales numbers with their re-engined airplanes. Had Boeing designed the max as it is now the fleet wouldn’t have been grounded and they would be generating easy money from a reconfiguration of an existing type. Those sales would have had a big impact on long term profits while they took their time and produced a proper clean sheet design. They cost themselves billions and people died because they went cheap with the original design, not from listening to what their customers wanted. Giving up 8-10 years of sales to Airbus while they got a clean sheet design into production would have also had a long term impact on their finances.
They still would have booked and sold several 737 NGs during that time to the customers who needed planes immediately. It's not like they would have made $0 in sales over 8-10 years.
threeighteen is offline  
Old 04-07-2022, 06:24 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 963
Default

I don't see a problem with a regional jet that takes more runway than a 767, especially as EMAS becomes more common.
fadec is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sailingfun
Delta
511
07-25-2022 09:54 AM
docav8tor
Southwest
7
12-23-2020 10:17 AM
docav8tor
Safety
0
11-13-2019 03:54 PM
bay982
Southwest
23
03-30-2016 05:29 AM
essw
Regional
7
06-27-2009 01:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices