Max 10
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 695
It was meant to be tongue in cheek to a degree. Yes EICAS is nice, but when something like a loud intermittent horn is going off, perhaps people should stop and look around to figure out why. The intermittent horn is either a takeoff configuration warning on the ground, or a cabin altitude warning in flight. If only those guys had a big round dial with differential pressure and cabin altitude right over their heads when the horn went off in flight to enable them to verify if the horn was legit or erroneous……. The 737 definitely isn’t the most advanced or automated plane out there, but it isn’t exactly that hard to manage either.
Human factors are always a factor.
I'm not specifically disagreeing with your comment as much as saying it seems shortsighted from a design and certification perspective to not have better systems and system logic when it's reasonably possible to do so.
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,319
I get it. We're expected to be extremely competent and it's a reasonable expectation. That said, we can go through all of aviation's history and find stacks of pilot-error caused accidents. Hey, those guys (insert accident - and historically they essentially all were guys) should have known better. Hey, MCAS was fine, they should have been more competent. Who needs TCAS with see and avoid. Who needs GPWS with proper situational awareness for terrain, MOCAs, MORAS etc. Who needs a takeoff warning horn anyways... proper checklist adherence should fully address any issue.
Human factors are always a factor.
I'm not specifically disagreeing with your comment as much as saying it seems shortsighted from a design and certification perspective to not have better systems and system logic when it's reasonably possible to do so.
Human factors are always a factor.
I'm not specifically disagreeing with your comment as much as saying it seems shortsighted from a design and certification perspective to not have better systems and system logic when it's reasonably possible to do so.
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 186
might as well get a good chiropractor now, your back and neck will thank you
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 655
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SFO Guppy CA
Posts: 1,112
An EICAS system should be mandatory because it’s much safer!!! End of discussion!!! The recall system that is currently on the Guppy dates back to the 1950s. That’s over 70 years of technological advances that have not been instituted. That BTW, is all to save some training costs!!! The Guppy has run its course and it’s now time for advances!!!
#26
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2021
Posts: 59
An EICAS system should be mandatory because it’s much safer!!! End of discussion!!! The recall system that is currently on the Guppy dates back to the 1950s. That’s over 70 years of technological advances that have not been instituted. That BTW, is all to save some training costs!!! The Guppy has run its course and it’s now time for advances!!!
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Posts: 510
The reason the 737 cockpit looks like it does is mostly due to the FAA, not Boeing. The FAA makes it so onerous to change anything due to training and certification requirements that is just is not feasible for airlines or Boeing. The FAA created this problem themselves.
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,118
The reason the 737 cockpit looks like it does is mostly due to the FAA, not Boeing. The FAA makes it so onerous to change anything due to training and certification requirements that is just is not feasible for airlines or Boeing. The FAA created this problem themselves.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Posts: 510
Boeing created this problem for themselves. Instead of creating a long overdue narrowbody from a clean sheet, they stretched the 737 yet again and are spending more time and losing more money by engineering work-arounds to get it working than it would have cost in R&D for a whole new jet.
#30
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Position: Power Isosceles
Posts: 119
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post