Voting is open
#3
it’s so nice that you chose to add some examples and reason to your argument this time shadow ;-)
Instead of telling people want to think, why don’t you explain to us your logic rather than just fear of an unknown outcome. Maybe throw in a couple scenarios where this TA stays in place and yet senior people are (more) negatively affected (than with current UPA). I don’t see one where demand is below 67.5% and we furlough less than 2007 pilots. Do you?
Instead of telling people want to think, why don’t you explain to us your logic rather than just fear of an unknown outcome. Maybe throw in a couple scenarios where this TA stays in place and yet senior people are (more) negatively affected (than with current UPA). I don’t see one where demand is below 67.5% and we furlough less than 2007 pilots. Do you?
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 164
it’s so nice that you chose to add some examples and reason to your argument this time shadow ;-)
Instead of telling people want to think, why don’t you explain to us your logic rather than just fear of an unknown outcome. Maybe throw in a couple scenarios where this TA stays in place and yet senior people are (more) negatively affected (than with current UPA). I don’t see one where demand is below 67.5% and we furlough less thanked 2007 pilots. Do you?
Instead of telling people want to think, why don’t you explain to us your logic rather than just fear of an unknown outcome. Maybe throw in a couple scenarios where this TA stays in place and yet senior people are (more) negatively affected (than with current UPA). I don’t see one where demand is below 67.5% and we furlough less thanked 2007 pilots. Do you?
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 145
it’s so nice that you chose to add some examples and reason to your argument this time shadow ;-)
Instead of telling people want to think, why don’t you explain to us your logic rather than just fear of an unknown outcome. Maybe throw in a couple scenarios where this TA stays in place and yet senior people are (more) negatively affected (than with current UPA). I don’t see one where demand is below 67.5% and we furlough less than 2007 pilots. Do you?
Instead of telling people want to think, why don’t you explain to us your logic rather than just fear of an unknown outcome. Maybe throw in a couple scenarios where this TA stays in place and yet senior people are (more) negatively affected (than with current UPA). I don’t see one where demand is below 67.5% and we furlough less than 2007 pilots. Do you?
#6
it’s so nice that you chose to add some examples and reason to your argument this time shadow ;-)
Instead of telling people want to think, why don’t you explain to us your logic rather than just fear of an unknown outcome. Maybe throw in a couple scenarios where this TA stays in place and yet senior people are (more) negatively affected (than with current UPA). I don’t see one where demand is below 67.5% and we furlough less than 2007 pilots. Do you?
Instead of telling people want to think, why don’t you explain to us your logic rather than just fear of an unknown outcome. Maybe throw in a couple scenarios where this TA stays in place and yet senior people are (more) negatively affected (than with current UPA). I don’t see one where demand is below 67.5% and we furlough less than 2007 pilots. Do you?
This is unknown and beyond the company’s control. If these procedures were already in place then you would at least have a base timeline you could go off of. We have nothing other than saying a vaccine may me approved by 2Q of 2021
so what are you basing your travel bounce back off of?
#8
Curious what is you timeline for a vaccine approval, production, implementation, and availability and cost to decrease enough to facilitate and demand in travel returning. Also what is you timeline for after these metrics have been met that countries will open up travel again to US. Like I have said before several states are not allowing entry unless you can produce tests results.
This is unknown and beyond the company’s control. If these procedures were already in place then you would at least have a base timeline you could go off of. We have nothing other than saying a vaccine may me approved by 2Q of 2021
so what are you basing your travel bounce back off of?
This is unknown and beyond the company’s control. If these procedures were already in place then you would at least have a base timeline you could go off of. We have nothing other than saying a vaccine may me approved by 2Q of 2021
so what are you basing your travel bounce back off of?
bottoms up, I have painted scenarios for both increased and stagnant demand. I have never said I know what will happen, But if demand is that low, there is a minuscule chance the company carries 85% of our current list.
#10
big 5, I’m senior lower tier. However, my vote is not for my own income, like many, I would be better off making 73 hours of FO pay and taking the furlough pay. My vote is to work at a strong airline in 2 to 3 years. I would rather be furloughed than work at the United of 2010. Kirby isn’t Tilton. I’m sure they have a lot on common... but their desires for the airline are 180 degrees.
bottoms up, I have painted scenarios for both increased and stagnant demand. I have never said I know what will happen, But if demand is that low, there is a minuscule chance the company carries 85% of our current list.
bottoms up, I have painted scenarios for both increased and stagnant demand. I have never said I know what will happen, But if demand is that low, there is a minuscule chance the company carries 85% of our current list.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post