Search

Notices

Pilot Shortage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-09-2020, 03:21 PM
  #51  
777 - ret
 
Huell's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Position: Waco CG-4 center seat
Posts: 863
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
Yeah until you get to the point where you need someone to make an instinctual decision but the automation cannot do it. After the third go around for unstable conditions and the fuel is about to run out and this landing must be made - who do you want doing it? Me or George?

I can’t count the times I’ve climbed above plan or slowed to requested shortcuts to conserve fuel that I ended up needing because of Atc or wx delays. I can SEE a building cell and avoid it as nothing yet is showing on the radar. Etc.
By no means do I support the idea. I will not get on one (assuming I'm still around). I wish I didn't live on the runway centerline.
Huell is offline  
Old 08-09-2020, 03:28 PM
  #52  
777 - ret
 
Huell's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Position: Waco CG-4 center seat
Posts: 863
Default

Originally Posted by Setopbug
My airplane's crosswind limit is 25 knots. My limit is 45 knots.

It's going to be decades, and will require a clean sheet aircraft and systems architecture design, and a complete change in how the NAS is run. And you've probably seen how quickly the FAA embraces, procures and refines new technology.

Optical sensors are improving? LOL. The USAF can't deliver a FMC refueler based on existing airframe technology after two decades.

Relax. Your concern should be how you're going to keep from having to spend your life savings on medical care. Nearest, hottest threat, buddy.
You know as well as I do that the Triple can handle a lot more than the 45 knots ... Hand flown that is.
Huell is offline  
Old 08-09-2020, 04:10 PM
  #53  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 46
Default

Originally Posted by flightmedic01
’Bus does the same thing.
I've been flying the A320 for 11 years and have never seen this. I'm not saying it doesn't happen, just curious if others have seen it in current model Airbus.
Ohio is offline  
Old 08-09-2020, 06:35 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 997
Default

Originally Posted by flightmedic01
’Bus does the same thing.
Same for the 757.
Precontact is online now  
Old 08-09-2020, 09:36 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by Viperstick
While we ruminate about something (HAL taking our place) that is years, probably decades away at least, I think we're missing the big picture.

The title of this thread is "Pilot Shortage." Demand for our services was extremely high and accelerating seven months ago. That drove the pay improvements all carriers saw through the '10s. This black swan event is unprecedented, but like all black swan events, it will eventually pass. When it does and there is again accelerating demand for our services, where are the pilots going to come from? The military has been producing far less pilots than it used to and at least the Air Force still has a serious rated manning shortage. Civilian production has been decimated by the lost decade and the attendant aversion to the high cost and low return on investment prospective pilots faced, hence programs like Aviate to try to prime the pump. After this event, it may again be a hard sell to a college age American to consider a career in aviation. But the fact remains, we are difficult to produce widgets--there's a long lead time and considerable expense to do so. You can't just magically produce an ATP qualified individual overnight.
I know how to fix this upcoming shortage of pilots. Age 67 70 Just eliminate all age restrictions. Problem solved. We can all fly 'til we die.
Andy is offline  
Old 08-09-2020, 10:00 PM
  #56  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 737
Posts: 83
Default

Originally Posted by tallpilot
With all due respect, every head in the sand 'automation ain't taking my job' argument assumes that if the computer can't figure it out the airplane just runs out of fuel and crashes. These flights will be constantly monitored from the SoC and there will be multiple ways to upload changes including taking over full control manually.

Do you think it might occur to them to put a video camera on the nose to 'see' that building cumulus you mentioned? Optical sensors keep improving and so do the algorithms used to analyze the data. I don't mean to be insulting but it is truly inconceivable to you that engineers can't figure out how to get a computer to steer around a cloud??

First we will fly these things single pilot to monitor the automation to see how it does. Then we'll move to being on standby in the SoC to take over manual control, then they will figure out they don't need 'real' pilots for that.

I know nobody wants to think of the day the skills we've spent a lifetime perfecting are nearly worthless but ignoring trends and pretending it won't happen is irrational. The only question is can we make it to retirement before it does.

Yeah, great idea about the camera. How many times have “you” lost the feed to your house cameras. Or lost the signal from wifi locks or the myriad of other gizmos—- all it will take is a few minutes of lost contact to lose a plane load of people. Not saying the “automation” wont happen—- but first they HAVE to get siri to be able to translate a sentence PERFECTLY —-EVERY SINGLE TIME FROM EVERY KIND OF ACCENT- before you trust “automation” with an entire plane load of people. If they can’t get something as mundane as siri right—-why are you willing to trust automation with your families lives.
javaguy141 is offline  
Old 08-09-2020, 11:40 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,130
Default

I think the first two posters of false loc are CRJ pilots. False loc capture is a CRJ Rockwell Collins 4200 issue and not at ground based issue.
captive apple is offline  
Old 08-10-2020, 03:26 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GuppyPuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: JetRight, JetLeft
Posts: 760
Default

Originally Posted by captive apple
I think the first two posters of false loc are CRJ pilots. False loc capture is a CRJ Rockwell Collins 4200 issue and not at ground based issue.
I've had it with Honeywell on the E190.

Gup
GuppyPuppy is offline  
Old 08-10-2020, 04:25 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by captive apple
I think the first two posters of false loc are CRJ pilots. False loc capture is a CRJ Rockwell Collins 4200 issue and not at ground based issue.
Im not saying it’s a ground based problem. It does not matter where the problem lies. It’s easy for a human pilot to see. The computer? Maybe not so much and that’s the point. It’s just one example of many as to why autonomous aircraft are a poor idea.
pangolin is offline  
Old 08-10-2020, 05:28 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,788
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Andy
We can all fly 'til we die.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDTS7zoI5pw
SonicFlyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AirBear
Hiring News
1
07-06-2018 09:32 PM
Opus
Major
46
04-04-2008 09:47 PM
Oldfreightdawg
Major
1
03-03-2008 06:43 PM
jelloy683
Major
9
08-03-2007 01:05 PM
aerospacepilot
Regional
59
07-01-2007 04:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices