Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
So no reduced credit hours for everyone? >

So no reduced credit hours for everyone?

Search

Notices

So no reduced credit hours for everyone?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2020, 05:20 PM
  #11  
maxing the min/Moderator
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: 757
Posts: 1,410
Default

Originally Posted by rvfanatic
Isn’t this exactly what Fedex did in 08 to keep from furloughing a single pilot?

I’d like to see a quantitative assessment on this from ALPA. Pros and cons lay it all out for us.

This is a part of Fedex’s contract
jetlaggy is offline  
Old 05-02-2020, 05:24 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,085
Default

I wouldn’t expect no furloughs but maybe fewer furloughs?

reduced hours are the best option. The company is highly motivated to bring hours up again on their own. Pay rates not so much.

if 50 hour lines reduce furloughs by 1500 pilots or so - isn’t that worth it
TFAYD is offline  
Old 05-02-2020, 05:38 PM
  #13  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 9
Default

Reduced hours are better than reduced wages. Though looking at it I don’t know if there’s anything preferable right now besides a clean shot of vodka.
Kung Flu Master is offline  
Old 05-02-2020, 05:57 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 425
Default

Originally Posted by jetlaggy
This is a part of Fedex’s contract
Oh ya 4.a.2.b.

With some pilots facing furlough #3 in less than 20yrs, you think we’d try and negotiate similar.
rvfanatic is offline  
Old 05-02-2020, 06:10 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Position: Guppy Capt
Posts: 151
Default

Originally Posted by 89Pistons
You're going to let one APC post decide how you vote on the assessment?
Don’t be ridiculous. The point being that during the last two UAL furloughs ALPA did quite a bit to alleviate both furloughs and the pain from resulting furloughs. They (we) hardly ate their own. Somehow this seems to be forgotten.
Freight Dawg is offline  
Old 05-02-2020, 06:11 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 55
Default

Originally Posted by TFAYD
I wouldn’t expect no furloughs but maybe fewer furloughs?

reduced hours are the best option. The company is highly motivated to bring hours up again on their own. Pay rates not so much.

if 50 hour lines reduce furloughs by 1500 pilots or so - isn’t that worth it

It doesn’t work that way. Are you somewhat new to the industry? You don’t seem to have personal knowledge of living through a downturn before.

A significant portion of the total cost per pilot is not wages. Everybody at 50 hour lines is still more expensive than furloughing and having the remaining pilots flying a lot. It’s all about efficiencies and the bottom line. I’m on the chopping block but I’ve been furloughed before. I know how this story ends: You give; company asks for more to simply do what they were going to do anyways but now is able to say, “see, you saved some furloughs”.

Ask the old timers how it worked out for them when they took concessions to save their pensions.
AirMicronesia is offline  
Old 05-02-2020, 06:15 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 756 left
Posts: 766
Default

Originally Posted by Freight Dawg
Don’t be ridiculous. The point being that during the last two UAL furloughs ALPA did quite a bit to alleviate both furloughs and the pain from resulting furloughs. They (we) hardly ate their own. Somehow this seems to be forgotten.
You mentioned that you'd remember that post when voting for the assessment. Which implied it was a variable on how you would vote. I'm well aware that ALPA did quote a bit. I was a recipient of the fund. Twice.
Some might not remember or acknowledge it. But that shouldn't be a variable in your decision process. Now I know it's not.
89Pistons is offline  
Old 05-02-2020, 06:37 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

Are we actually having this discussion?

Pilots can work for FREE and the company will still furlough, still steal from you, still declare BK, and still LINE THEIR POCKETS in the process. Pilots will return from furlough to a flimsy contract and much lower pay. Those not furloughed will be working under a flimsy contract and for much lower wages and will enjoy stepped up "supervision" from management. The concession stand will NEVER close. The monies wrested from ALL of the employees will never be repaid, their loyalty and sense of "duty" to save the company will be laughed at in Willis.

We have a contract. Let's just enforce it while we eat the GIANT fecal sandwich.
oldmako is offline  
Old 05-02-2020, 06:45 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LeeFXDWG's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B737 CAPT IAH
Posts: 1,130
Default

Originally Posted by TFAYD
I wouldn’t expect no furloughs but maybe fewer furloughs?

reduced hours are the best option. The company is highly motivated to bring hours up again on their own. Pay rates not so much.

if 50 hour lines reduce furloughs by 1500 pilots or so - isn’t that worth it
Well, you’re just looking at one part of the whole financial cost of each pilot widget. The company wants less yet more efficient widgets to reduce costs significantly. See PBS and LCO mistakes made by us post 911. Caused at least 1000 furloughs. But the A plan still went poof....

Also, comparing us to FedEx isn’t apples to apples. The only common aspect is the airplanes. They fly cargo.

My neighbor is in international sales for UPS and things are going very well believe it or not. Heck we are doing 200 plus dedicated cargo flights a week right now.

Sadly, our revenue base is passengers. Cargo is our side business.

The fact is we could work for free and still have the additional costs the company pays for each of us. And working might give them 2 days cash burn every month at most.

Concessions never yield the desired outcome. And they take decades to get back. Heck, they rarely come back all the way.

And manpower is driven mainly by block hours not the cost of the pilot. Remember that.

Be safe,

Lee
LeeFXDWG is offline  
Old 05-02-2020, 06:45 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by AirMicronesia
It doesn’t work that way. Are you somewhat new to the industry? You don’t seem to have personal knowledge of living through a downturn before.

A significant portion of the total cost per pilot is not wages. Everybody at 50 hour lines is still more expensive than furloughing and having the remaining pilots flying a lot. It’s all about efficiencies and the bottom line. I’m on the chopping block but I’ve been furloughed before. I know how this story ends: You give; company asks for more to simply do what they were going to do anyways but now is able to say, “see, you saved some furloughs”.

Ask the old timers how it worked out for them when they took concessions to save their pensions.
why does it not work that way?

if you have 15000 block hours to cover. You can do that with 2000 crews at 75 hours each or 3000 crews at 50 hours.

yes, I realize that there are other fixed costs associated with pilots. That’s why the company y would prefer the 75 hour solution over the 50 hour option. I also realize that the 50 hour option will be more expensive overall than the 75 hour option. But it should be more desirable to the pilot group if the interest is avoiding furloughs.
TFAYD is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Stimpy the Kat
Kalitta Companies
77
12-03-2016 08:24 AM
glyde
Major
120
11-11-2011 02:31 PM
xfzz
Fractional
15
10-27-2009 05:37 PM
Koolaidman
Regional
30
06-29-2007 02:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices