So no reduced credit hours for everyone?
#11
maxing the min/Moderator
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: 757
Posts: 1,410
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,085
I wouldn’t expect no furloughs but maybe fewer furloughs?
reduced hours are the best option. The company is highly motivated to bring hours up again on their own. Pay rates not so much.
if 50 hour lines reduce furloughs by 1500 pilots or so - isn’t that worth it
reduced hours are the best option. The company is highly motivated to bring hours up again on their own. Pay rates not so much.
if 50 hour lines reduce furloughs by 1500 pilots or so - isn’t that worth it
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2012
Position: Guppy Capt
Posts: 151
Don’t be ridiculous. The point being that during the last two UAL furloughs ALPA did quite a bit to alleviate both furloughs and the pain from resulting furloughs. They (we) hardly ate their own. Somehow this seems to be forgotten.
#16
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 55
It doesn’t work that way. Are you somewhat new to the industry? You don’t seem to have personal knowledge of living through a downturn before.
A significant portion of the total cost per pilot is not wages. Everybody at 50 hour lines is still more expensive than furloughing and having the remaining pilots flying a lot. It’s all about efficiencies and the bottom line. I’m on the chopping block but I’ve been furloughed before. I know how this story ends: You give; company asks for more to simply do what they were going to do anyways but now is able to say, “see, you saved some furloughs”.
Ask the old timers how it worked out for them when they took concessions to save their pensions.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 756 left
Posts: 766
Some might not remember or acknowledge it. But that shouldn't be a variable in your decision process. Now I know it's not.
#18
Are we actually having this discussion?
Pilots can work for FREE and the company will still furlough, still steal from you, still declare BK, and still LINE THEIR POCKETS in the process. Pilots will return from furlough to a flimsy contract and much lower pay. Those not furloughed will be working under a flimsy contract and for much lower wages and will enjoy stepped up "supervision" from management. The concession stand will NEVER close. The monies wrested from ALL of the employees will never be repaid, their loyalty and sense of "duty" to save the company will be laughed at in Willis.
We have a contract. Let's just enforce it while we eat the GIANT fecal sandwich.
Pilots can work for FREE and the company will still furlough, still steal from you, still declare BK, and still LINE THEIR POCKETS in the process. Pilots will return from furlough to a flimsy contract and much lower pay. Those not furloughed will be working under a flimsy contract and for much lower wages and will enjoy stepped up "supervision" from management. The concession stand will NEVER close. The monies wrested from ALL of the employees will never be repaid, their loyalty and sense of "duty" to save the company will be laughed at in Willis.
We have a contract. Let's just enforce it while we eat the GIANT fecal sandwich.
#19
Also, comparing us to FedEx isn’t apples to apples. The only common aspect is the airplanes. They fly cargo.
My neighbor is in international sales for UPS and things are going very well believe it or not. Heck we are doing 200 plus dedicated cargo flights a week right now.
Sadly, our revenue base is passengers. Cargo is our side business.
The fact is we could work for free and still have the additional costs the company pays for each of us. And working might give them 2 days cash burn every month at most.
Concessions never yield the desired outcome. And they take decades to get back. Heck, they rarely come back all the way.
And manpower is driven mainly by block hours not the cost of the pilot. Remember that.
Be safe,
Lee
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,085
It doesn’t work that way. Are you somewhat new to the industry? You don’t seem to have personal knowledge of living through a downturn before.
A significant portion of the total cost per pilot is not wages. Everybody at 50 hour lines is still more expensive than furloughing and having the remaining pilots flying a lot. It’s all about efficiencies and the bottom line. I’m on the chopping block but I’ve been furloughed before. I know how this story ends: You give; company asks for more to simply do what they were going to do anyways but now is able to say, “see, you saved some furloughs”.
Ask the old timers how it worked out for them when they took concessions to save their pensions.
A significant portion of the total cost per pilot is not wages. Everybody at 50 hour lines is still more expensive than furloughing and having the remaining pilots flying a lot. It’s all about efficiencies and the bottom line. I’m on the chopping block but I’ve been furloughed before. I know how this story ends: You give; company asks for more to simply do what they were going to do anyways but now is able to say, “see, you saved some furloughs”.
Ask the old timers how it worked out for them when they took concessions to save their pensions.
if you have 15000 block hours to cover. You can do that with 2000 crews at 75 hours each or 3000 crews at 50 hours.
yes, I realize that there are other fixed costs associated with pilots. That’s why the company y would prefer the 75 hour solution over the 50 hour option. I also realize that the 50 hour option will be more expensive overall than the 75 hour option. But it should be more desirable to the pilot group if the interest is avoiding furloughs.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post