Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Displacement Bid 20-07D >

Displacement Bid 20-07D

Search

Notices

Displacement Bid 20-07D

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-2020, 11:03 AM
  #271  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cadetdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Default

Originally Posted by whaler
Divide the min/max # by your # in base could give a ballpark baseline. Assumining they furlough those those extras on the NB. It seems there are over and unders in all seats and ac up the list and how that shakes out in round two is unknown and to complicated for me to predict but I'd like to hear other thoughts.
The problem with predicting "the number" is inherent to the unique situation. We've never been here before.

The company has ingeniously (not that we like it) figured out a solution to the restrictions in the UPA that provides maximum flexibility to the company. This would not work in normal times, but we are not in normal times. Thus, they can pretty easily furlough anywhere from 0% to 20% on Oct 1 with only minimal pain for an additional 10% beyond that. If they need to furlough more than that, it means nobody is flying so trained crews are not an issue anyway.

Meanwhile, everybody displaced to a narrow body will only require a short course when they return to their previous aircraft during the rebound. The company can move staffing levels in any direction with lots of atypical flexibility permitting a much more rapid 'return to normal' if that occurs.

But for us pilots, we can only guess what staffing levels will be required this fall and for next summer. If it helps, and it doesn't, I don't think anybody else knows that number for sure either. Everybody is guessing and nobody knows.
cadetdrivr is offline  
Old 05-12-2020, 11:04 AM
  #272  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Posts: 1,182
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
patient zero
One can only dream
BMEP100 is offline  
Old 05-12-2020, 11:25 AM
  #273  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,221
Default

Originally Posted by Noworkallplay
I guess it depends who you are flying freight for. As a domestic knuckle dragger at Purple my schedule looks nothing like what you describe. When I was an FO I did very little night flying if any. In fact, as a guy who use to be at a “legacy”, I would never return to the 3-4 leg days of pax hauling with 3 hour sits at the terminal. Plus, I couldn't afford the pay cut.

I guess to each their own. Just like pax airlines all cargo isn’t created equal. I bet if flying cargo kept a bunch of pilots on property at UAL the line would be out the door.
As a fellow FedEx guy, you (respectfully) really need to shut the hell up. Go back to the FedEx boards and argue/complain there.

Empathy? Humility? Ever hear those terms?
coryk is offline  
Old 05-12-2020, 01:42 PM
  #274  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 75
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
The narrowbody numbers will presumably be slashed on Oct 1. .
anything beyond “next Tuesday” is long term planning for airlines

4 entire months plus change will elapse until October 1st. That’s a long time to run so don’t get too down just yet
The stillest is offline  
Old 05-12-2020, 01:52 PM
  #275  
777 - ret
 
Huell's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Position: Waco CG-4 center seat
Posts: 863
Default

Originally Posted by JimLaheyTPS
So as we see roughly 90% of bids are in and we have these cooked percentages shown with the snapshots, what are we do expect for bid 2? I’m currently showing around 35-45% on a variety of NB FO seats. Obviously those numbers are going to be slashed on displacement 2.

Is there any way to begin to formulate just how much of a slash these NB FO seats will see for bid 2? I haven’t paid attention to other seats with this bid but I imagine NB CA is also bloated with more CA’s than they know what to do with right? So with that said, those of us seeing 35% now on NB FO should plan to see another huge hit for bid 2 right? I’m expecting to get knocked down another 35-45%, which is starting to look like a best case scenario if I don’t get furloughed.

Would anyone else care to chime in to let me know if this is a reasonable outlook to have for what displacement bid 2 could look like?
Just go ugly early ... Works.
Huell is offline  
Old 05-12-2020, 02:08 PM
  #276  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 805
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
Being that 30% of our list is around 4,000 pilots, considering what is going on, and how many analysts predict the recovery will play out, “only furloughing 2,300” could be viewed as an optimistic position. Furlough notices can go out in June for an October 1 effective date. From how I read the furlough section of the contract, none of those pilots would need to be trained according to a displacement award. Simply holding them at their current pay and then furloughing will be cheaper than training them. It will also free up slots at TK for those who will survive this cut. I don’t like how this is turning out, but this bid is definitely a pretty effective way to reduce quickly while adhering to the contract.
30% less than 2019 numbers in summer of 2021 would include 800 pilots gone to retirement, maybe 200 or so to medical outs, whatever furlough mitigation or early outs the union comes up with, and sprinkle in an insanely expensive process.c I wouldn't call it optimistic that 2300 number is still a lot of guys trying to provide for their families and includes myself. If you furlough a pilot you can core4 them as much as you want but you have lost them forever. Just think of the cost of icey cold guppies and two engine taxi outs for 30 years. A lot of ballgame ahead.
Aquaticus is offline  
Old 05-12-2020, 02:28 PM
  #277  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 312
Default

Originally Posted by Aquaticus
30% less than 2019 numbers in summer of 2021 would include 800 pilots gone to retirement, maybe 200 or so to medical outs, whatever furlough mitigation or early outs the union comes up with, and sprinkle in an insanely expensive process.c I wouldn't call it optimistic that 2300 number is still a lot of guys trying to provide for their families and includes myself. If you furlough a pilot you can core4 them as much as you want but you have lost them forever. Just think of the cost of icey cold guppies and two engine taxi outs for 30 years. A lot of ballgame ahead.
So let me see if I understand you: if you get furloughed, you are going to return but never operate efficiently again? Okay, how about those of us that get downgraded and lose the pay etc associated do the same while you are out because we are “angry “ as well thus prolonging your return? Or, realistically how about none of us take this personally (as hard is that is) and realize that it is just a numbers game that unfortunately we are losing at present. Last I read, the ALPA Code of Ethics frowned on such behavior. I get it. I’m disappointed right now as well but I’m not interested in costing this company even more money by operating in a manner that does so. Sometimes we just need to blow off some steam. I completely understand if that is what you are doing. I really hope you don’t get furloughed. I spent most of May 3 going through the list of displacement names then read the CCS staffing list from bottom up four thousand numbers (picked that number at random...). It was painful seeing all the names of people I shared the cockpit with who each had stories I remember. Nobody did anything to deserve this. It just sucks.

Last edited by Vernon Demerest; 05-12-2020 at 03:11 PM.
Vernon Demerest is offline  
Old 05-12-2020, 02:57 PM
  #278  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Default

Originally Posted by Aquaticus
30% less than 2019 numbers in summer of 2021 would include 800 pilots gone to retirement, maybe 200 or so to medical outs, whatever furlough mitigation or early outs the union comes up with, and sprinkle in an insanely expensive process.c I wouldn't call it optimistic that 2300 number is still a lot of guys trying to provide for their families and includes myself. If you furlough a pilot you can core4 them as much as you want but you have lost them forever. Just think of the cost of icey cold guppies and two engine taxi outs for 30 years. A lot of ballgame ahead.
I don’t think anyone thinks for a second that 2,300 is a small number, or that families won’t be affected. Training displacements when pilots are just sitting around isn’t nearly as expensive as other times when we were retiring a fleet, but demand was still high. It would stink, but they could easily chop 3,000 on October 1 if revenue is still down. That would allow them to drop a bunch of payroll/benefit expense off of the books quickly. The recall process will cost money, but that won’t happen until sufficient revenue is coming in the door. The other labor groups could be let go even more quickly. There isn’t that much time or expense in training ramp workers for example. If the company is at X% on October 1, those groups get slashed 100-X% day one. It isn’t what we want, but what the company will need to do. Starting October 1, they are going to get all cost, including pilots, to a level that allows the bleeding to stop. Furlough and displacements stink. Many of us have been down that road before, some more than once. I hope that you don’t get furloughed, and I get that you’re just lashing out, but if you do, I hope that when you come back you will act professional. Others have been through furloughs, bankruptcy, and a merger. They still act professional, and I expect that most people will as well.
Itsajob is offline  
Old 05-12-2020, 03:19 PM
  #279  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ReadOnly7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,337
Default

I will get furloughed waaaaay before Aquaticus, and I think his post must have been satire. I mean.....who has ever heard of an “ice cold guppy”?? I call BS!!


*all joking aside....please be professional while we are on the street, so that we can come back as soon as possible. Even though I will have PTSD from this industry, I will be extra grateful to have this job when I get back.
ReadOnly7 is offline  
Old 05-12-2020, 03:29 PM
  #280  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GolferNJ's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Position: 777 FO
Posts: 217
Default

Originally Posted by Vernon Demerest
Nobody did anything to deserve this.
I agree with everything you said except this. OM and SK put us in this situation. They have squandered every penny earned on our backs since they took over. They could have been paying down debt, hoarding cash and preparing the airline to support its employees in the next downturn. Instead they rewarded shareholders (and themselves) and required taxpayers to save us. Nobody could have predicted a 90% drop, but we would be in this situation with a 40% drop and no taxpayer assistance.
GolferNJ is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Stimpy the Kat
Kalitta Companies
77
12-03-2016 08:24 AM
jsled
United
232
07-24-2016 09:34 AM
cgull
United
127
04-05-2013 03:43 AM
8-capt
Cargo
44
11-18-2009 11:42 PM
ERJ135
Regional
43
07-21-2008 06:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices