May - eSRL Round 2
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
When CAL furloughed the 147, those pilots at least had a place worth coming back to.
This is a good time RIGHT NOW, for all vulnerable pilots (bottom half of the list) to dust off their resume's and do some career broadening.
We could work for free and it likely won't help the hemorrhaging of the corporate finances.
The company simply needs to get a very large access to credit. That would be my advice to the reps. Simply encourage the company to go out and get access to capital. We've given enough in this profession financially. It's time for management to do what management does; get cash, and get it on the best terms they can.
As pilots we can continue to operate as efficiently as possible and point out where economic efficiencies can be gained. But, we all have bills to pay, and we need our paychecks too. The union should never go out and get Stockholm syndrome. Management manages. The union enforces labor agreements.
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
I guess we can agree to disagree here. Again why did the union get this LOA out rite before the grant moneys?
why did the union give up what was IN the contract? For something less valuable? A concession imo
Yes it gives us CHOICES, not very good ones in comparison to what we had.
why did the union give up what was IN the contract? For something less valuable? A concession imo
Yes it gives us CHOICES, not very good ones in comparison to what we had.
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
I guess we can agree to disagree here. Again why did the union get this LOA out rite before the grant moneys?
why did the union give up what was IN the contract? For something less valuable? A concession imo
Yes it gives us CHOICES, not very good ones in comparison to what we had.
why did the union give up what was IN the contract? For something less valuable? A concession imo
Yes it gives us CHOICES, not very good ones in comparison to what we had.
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 419
I disagree. We likely can't get objective enough criteria in place that is both trust-worthy and verifiable to guarantee the temporary cuts don't become long term guts.
When CAL furloughed the 147, those pilots at least had a place worth coming back to.
This is a good time RIGHT NOW, for all vulnerable pilots (bottom half of the list) to dust off their resume's and do some career broadening.
We could work for free and it likely won't help the hemorrhaging of the corporate finances.
The company simply needs to get a very large access to credit. That would be my advice to the reps. Simply encourage the company to go out and get access to capital. We've given enough in this profession financially. It's time for management to do what management does; get cash, and get it on the best terms they can.
As pilots we can continue to operate as efficiently as possible and point out where economic efficiencies can be gained. But, we all have bills to pay, and we need our paychecks too. The union should never go out and get Stockholm syndrome. Management manages. The union enforces labor agreements.
When CAL furloughed the 147, those pilots at least had a place worth coming back to.
This is a good time RIGHT NOW, for all vulnerable pilots (bottom half of the list) to dust off their resume's and do some career broadening.
We could work for free and it likely won't help the hemorrhaging of the corporate finances.
The company simply needs to get a very large access to credit. That would be my advice to the reps. Simply encourage the company to go out and get access to capital. We've given enough in this profession financially. It's time for management to do what management does; get cash, and get it on the best terms they can.
As pilots we can continue to operate as efficiently as possible and point out where economic efficiencies can be gained. But, we all have bills to pay, and we need our paychecks too. The union should never go out and get Stockholm syndrome. Management manages. The union enforces labor agreements.
#25
I would say the union acted ethically, reasonably and responsibly. The union gave choices to the pilots and those choices came at the behest of management. Management presented options, some of which likely didn't make it to the pilots. At the end of the day the pilot chooses to participate in these voluntary programs or doesn't. I am ok with that. I don't view it as a concession, i simply view it as a choice. Some pilots may take this down time to do the things they've wanted to do and couldn't get the time off. It's a choice. it's voluntary.
The MEC approved a new LOA that provides the same credit (50hrs) but splits the pay between now and a promise for the remainder at a later date (December).
Both sides might be playing 4-D chess, [sarcasm] but yeah, it wasn't a concession. [/sarcasm]
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
I don't want to see what happened at the CAL MEC happen here. That is the sort of stockholm syndrome I am referring to.
I don't understand your 2012 SLI slogan reference.
It's all about supply and demand. Our focus should be on meeting the demand as supply is added back into the system.
I would support ALPA in distributing funds on an as needed basis to any pilots who are furloughed. We've given ALPA allot of money over the years. ALPA could look inside introspectively and see what financial resources could be re-allocated and distributed to pilots in need.
#27
You look like a nail
Thread Starter
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 451
Do you think that there’s something ALPA can do to prevent furloughs in the Fall?
I’m sure that what you have to say is important, but’s it’s just not clear what that is. I’m not trying to be snarky or an English major, but I read that first message 3 times and still don’t fully understand what your feedback to the LEC was. If you’re asking for unity on a direction, throw your union brothers a bone and be clear about what that is.
ALPA threw the company a bone and provided some voluntary methods to reduce payroll. I’m not convinced that they’re 100% behind the new programs but it’s up to the company to sell it.
Beyond that, I’d be very very critical of an MEC that makes too much of an effort to put our collective heads on the chopping block.
So with that, what IS your proposal?
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Position: Guppy.
Posts: 285
Uh, a voluntary Surplus Reduction Line (SRL) option has been in the UPA all along (20-Q-8). It was negotiated exactly for this type of situation and was used during April, for example.
The MEC approved a new LOA that provides the same credit (50hrs) but splits the pay between now and a promise for the remainder at a later date (December).
Both sides might be playing 4-D chess, [sarcasm] but yeah, it wasn't a concession. [/sarcasm]
The MEC approved a new LOA that provides the same credit (50hrs) but splits the pay between now and a promise for the remainder at a later date (December).
Both sides might be playing 4-D chess, [sarcasm] but yeah, it wasn't a concession. [/sarcasm]
Again, don't like it? Don't take it.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Just throwing out a suggestion, not negotiating anything.
PMFJI, but the LPA could be reduced further than what the contract currently calls for with pilots on furlough. 5-B-1-a puts LPA no less than 74 and no greater than 82. Agree to lower those numbers further.
In addition, put a cap on total monthly credit hours of say 90 (a number that was removed from my rectum) with all time above that to be paid at a rate of … zero. No pay bank for the credit *****s. All assignments above 80 monthly credit can be refused by the pilot.
He11 no to pay cuts. Cut hours worked, not pay.
The above allows management to furlough fewer pilots and reduces training costs for them.
Feel free to criticize; I'm just tossing out the idea.
PMFJI, but the LPA could be reduced further than what the contract currently calls for with pilots on furlough. 5-B-1-a puts LPA no less than 74 and no greater than 82. Agree to lower those numbers further.
In addition, put a cap on total monthly credit hours of say 90 (a number that was removed from my rectum) with all time above that to be paid at a rate of … zero. No pay bank for the credit *****s. All assignments above 80 monthly credit can be refused by the pilot.
He11 no to pay cuts. Cut hours worked, not pay.
The above allows management to furlough fewer pilots and reduces training costs for them.
Feel free to criticize; I'm just tossing out the idea.
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 419
There's no flame bait at all. I've looked into what other professions and advocations are doing. No discussion on voluntary concessions to mitigate furloughs.
I don't want to see what happened at the CAL MEC happen here. That is the sort of stockholm syndrome I am referring to.
I don't understand your 2012 SLI slogan reference.
It's all about supply and demand. Our focus should be on meeting the demand as supply is added back into the system.
I would support ALPA in distributing funds on an as needed basis to any pilots who are furloughed. We've given ALPA allot of money over the years. ALPA could look inside introspectively and see what financial resources could be re-allocated and distributed to pilots in need.
I don't want to see what happened at the CAL MEC happen here. That is the sort of stockholm syndrome I am referring to.
I don't understand your 2012 SLI slogan reference.
It's all about supply and demand. Our focus should be on meeting the demand as supply is added back into the system.
I would support ALPA in distributing funds on an as needed basis to any pilots who are furloughed. We've given ALPA allot of money over the years. ALPA could look inside introspectively and see what financial resources could be re-allocated and distributed to pilots in need.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post