Search

Notices

Furlough pay?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2020, 04:18 PM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Captain
Posts: 1,561
Default

Originally Posted by Huell
Over on the DAL thread you predicted 25% for UAL... Pulling numbers out of that dark orfice at will.

lots of changes since then
reduce pay leaves etc
18 is more like it as of now and again things change daily


cheers from the dark office at will
Sniper66 is offline  
Old 04-17-2020, 09:33 PM
  #92  
The Beach
 
TheSoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 63
Default

Not a "Doom & Gloom", but a read with stark factors/number's in today's industry as it pertains......Some strings attached.

https://crankyflier.com/2020/04/16/d...ustry-delayed/
TheSoCalGuy is offline  
Old 04-18-2020, 07:54 AM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bigfatdaddy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 862
Default

Originally Posted by TheSoCalGuy
Not a "Doom & Gloom", but a read with stark factors/number's in today's industry as it pertains......Some strings attached.

https://crankyflier.com/2020/04/16/d...ustry-delayed/

The “Doom and Gloom” is that there is an unstated presupposition that demand does not return at a meaningful level. That’s the kicker, no one knows......My glass is half full and demand starts to recover during the summer months......time will tell. What doe they say? “No plan survives first contact with the enemy”. Have a robust plan and prepare to re-plan.

my 2 cents
bigfatdaddy is offline  
Old 04-18-2020, 11:28 AM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,860
Default

Originally Posted by bigfatdaddy
What do they say? “No plan survives first contact with the enemy”. Have a robust plan and prepare to re-plan.

my 2 cents
I think it's:

"Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face."
-Mike Tyson
JoePatroni is online now  
Old 04-18-2020, 12:18 PM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SFO Guppy CA
Posts: 1,112
Default

Originally Posted by JoePatroni
I think it's:

"Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face."
-Mike Tyson
Just ask Michael Spinks...
DashTrash is offline  
Old 04-23-2020, 05:20 AM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 963
Default

18% sounds awfully close to the the date where they'd have to pull seats out of RJs. If demand stays down that won't be a problem.
fadec is offline  
Old 04-23-2020, 12:23 PM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Default

Originally Posted by fadec
18% sounds awfully close to the the date where they'd have to pull seats out of RJs. If demand stays down that won't be a problem.
Here is an interesting thing to think about regarding pulling seats. Currently, we are blocking all middle seats from being sold (other than family together). Effectively, we have already pulled about 45 seats from every mainline narrowbody. I'm not sure if they have done anything similar with Express but if they follow the same methodology then they are going to stop selling almost half on the E-175 seats. Instead of four across, they will now be two across (similar to FC in an A320 or 737). So, is this good or bad for us?

Good: The E-175 is now a terribly inefficient 38 seat airplane. Get rid of it (for now)

Bad: Pulling six seats from every 76 seater is completely irrelevant in this market. If anything, it will make the E175 more efficient because it's lighter.
CALFO is offline  
Old 04-23-2020, 12:47 PM
  #98  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Default

Originally Posted by CALFO
Here is an interesting thing to think about regarding pulling seats. Currently, we are blocking all middle seats from being sold (other than family together). Effectively, we have already pulled about 45 seats from every mainline narrowbody. I'm not sure if they have done anything similar with Express but if they follow the same methodology then they are going to stop selling almost half on the E-175 seats. Instead of four across, they will now be two across (similar to FC in an A320 or 737). So, is this good or bad for us?

Good: The E-175 is now a terribly inefficient 38 seat airplane. Get rid of it (for now)

Bad: Pulling six seats from every 76 seater is completely irrelevant in this market. If anything, it will make the E175 more efficient because it's lighter.
They are doing this now because they can’t sell the seats and the planes are empty. It’s getting credit for “doing something” without any additional cost. The second that demand returns they will be selling those seats unless passengers can prove that they are willing to pay significantly more to fly with an empty seat next to them. A theoretical plane with 25 rows of 6 seats each would hold 150 pax. If they can only sell 80 tickets due to low demand, they can “block off” the middle seats since they didn’t sell. When demand returns, they could either fill the 150 seats with $500 tickets, or block the middle seats and sell the remaining 100 seats for $750. Guess which option the public will pick.
Itsajob is offline  
Old 04-23-2020, 02:01 PM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
The second that demand returns they will be selling those seats unless passengers can prove that they are willing to pay significantly more to fly with an empty seat next to them.
If demand returns then what are we talking about?
CALFO is offline  
Old 04-23-2020, 04:14 PM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,701
Default

this will be a good example of what flights will look like when people get tired of staying home...

https://nypost.com/2020/04/23/airlin...wearing-masks/
ugleeual is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Clearedtopush
Delta
241
07-27-2016 06:10 PM
Albief15
FedEx
161
10-02-2015 03:11 PM
FedElta
Cargo
87
07-17-2015 07:26 AM
CAL EWR
United
44
11-26-2012 01:29 PM
nerd2009
Major
71
09-26-2010 01:19 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices