Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Short-term paycuts vs Chapter 11 >

Short-term paycuts vs Chapter 11

Search

Notices

Short-term paycuts vs Chapter 11

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2020, 09:28 AM
  #31  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 7
Default

Originally Posted by Big John
I guess you don’t remember Paul Whiteford and Mike Glawe telling us during C2003, “Don’t let it go to the judge.”

Regardless, once you’re in Chapter 11, management tells the judge what they need and the judge gives it to them. Have the laws changed back to where a bankrupt company goes into receivership or does management still call their own shots?

Management still call their own shots. That’s the danger of Chapter 11. There are no pensions to shed onto the government, so management will get what they want in CH11. Hopefully it never gets there.
There has only been one airline bankruptcy since the bankruptcy law change. It’s now much less management friendly. Ask the then AA management how their bankruptcy worked out for them. Here is a hint: the AA management group lost control of the process and American is now run by the team from Phoenix.
Me103 is offline  
Old 03-17-2020, 09:48 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 247
Default

Originally Posted by Regularguy
I've been at this for four decades, furloughed, strike, ESOP, BK, merger and now this.

Two things that bug me.

1. Selfish, egotistical pilots who think it's only about them.
2. Pilots who don't get they have a representative Union which will do their best to cut a deal.

It does no good to discuss what you personally are willing to take, give or whatever here or anywhere. It's not about you there's 13K other pilots with issues who are represented by ALPA.

You may hate what they come up with and quite frankly what they come up with may kill the goose or it might save it for another day. It is what it is.

Oh, and try to tell your FAs or neighbors how bad it was to be paid $95 an hour. They will probably shake their head and walk away.
Yeah, the neighbors probably think the $95 / hr is for a 40 hr work week x 4 for a months pay. Not how it works. Not their business either. Everyone needs to take care of their family.

I agree though, why not wait for the union to come back with something?
Cessna182TypeR is offline  
Old 03-17-2020, 12:49 PM
  #33  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: 756 Left Side
Posts: 1,629
Default

Mods..
Why are you allowing this 'individual' on here?

Motch
horrido27 is offline  
Old 03-18-2020, 06:20 AM
  #34  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,992
Default

Originally Posted by horrido27
Mods..
Why are you allowing this 'individual' on here?

Motch

Have you reported any specific TOS violations? We do not have enough MODs to effectively police this Forum without user help, and we can use as much help as possible. Individual users can help by reporting specific posts. We have made it very easy to report a post via the red triangle exclamation point on each post.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 03-18-2020, 03:51 PM
  #35  
Follower
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 57
Default

Originally Posted by Cessna182TypeR
Yeah, the neighbors probably think the $95 / hr is for a 40 hr work week x 4 for a months pay. Not how it works. Not their business either. Everyone needs to take care of their family.

I agree though, why not wait for the union to come back with something?
Duriing the last bankruptcy, the neighbors thought I worked 80 hours a month. Like 20 hours per week.
The Sentinel is offline  
Old 03-18-2020, 06:25 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Short term pay cuts not a good option for pilots. We can't manage what we can't manage. Giving up our pay still doesn't give us any control over the decision making.

Fly your trip for the negotiated pay rate and go home.

Taking a pay cut only helps the institutional investor, it doesn't help the employees. if management needs a loan they can get one with their good credit and/or any government programs.

We may all need to take out a few loans. Heck, ,if we negotiate give-backs, all pilots are going to be at the bank lining up. Better way is just to have management at the bank getting access to the capital they need.

The pilot group isn't a bank. We aren't a coin operated one-arm bandit. Banks give and lend money. Pilots...no, we've given way too much and haven't had it returned.

Not being mean or petty, but being real. If you were working on active duty in the military you wouldn't be negotiating a new pay rate for a first lieutenant or a major....same applies here.
baseball is offline  
Old 03-18-2020, 06:27 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by The Sentinel
Duriing the last bankruptcy, the neighbors thought I worked 80 hours a month. Like 20 hours per week.
That was only the first job. When you added up jobs 1, 2, and 3 you were pushing 90 plus billable hours a week.
baseball is offline  
Old 03-18-2020, 11:55 PM
  #38  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

If I were the government I would not provide funding or loans to any company without instant, non-negotiated compensation changes for executives and highly compensated employees. Companies that bought back their own shares instead of making the company healthier would have to surrender those shares to the Treasury in exchange for funding, and they only get them back if they can pay the Treasury back.

No negotiations. Take it or leave it. "No" means Chapter 11 at a minimum, probably Chapter 7 because no lender would provide DIP financing in these circumstances.

Just like when we declare an emergency in an airplane, the country has declared an emergency. They will do what they need to do to survive as a society.

I would expect it before the middle of next week.
Probe is offline  
Old 03-19-2020, 02:24 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,597
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
If I were the government I would not provide funding or loans to any company without instant, non-negotiated compensation changes for executives and highly compensated employees.
Be careful what you wish for. Highly compensated employees may include those making over 100k a year, ie, all of us pilots.
iahflyr is offline  
Old 03-19-2020, 04:13 AM
  #40  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

I consider pilots highly compensated employees. At least until the end of this week.
Probe is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Clearedtopush
Delta
241
07-27-2016 06:10 PM
jungle
Money Talk
8
11-20-2008 07:41 PM
FlyerJosh
Hangar Talk
3
03-29-2007 09:37 AM
Podaddy
Major
7
02-06-2007 08:11 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices