Search

Notices

Chance of furlough?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-2020, 04:59 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: 787
Posts: 469
Default

New data out last evening:

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsan...m_term=nprnews
FlyPurdue is offline  
Old 03-04-2020, 05:18 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,701
Default

When this first season is finally over the death rate will decrease to a much lower number... right now there are too many people who were sick/carriers and recovered without testing... they aren’t currently included in the figures.
ugleeual is offline  
Old 03-04-2020, 05:58 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

MEC linked an updating and interactive dashboard.

https://www.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashb...23467b48e9ecf6
APC225 is offline  
Old 03-04-2020, 06:10 AM
  #64  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Default

Once this is over hindsight will show that public hysteria did more damage to the economy than the actual virus ever could have. This isn’t simply the common flu, but there is no reason to clear the shelves of bottled water and toilet paper. It has been blown way out of proportion. By the time this is over the Max will be back and hiring will continue until the next crisis. For the younger pilots on the list, enjoy the experience, you’re going to see it again during your career.
Itsajob is offline  
Old 03-04-2020, 06:14 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 629
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
Once this is over hindsight will show that public hysteria did more damage to the economy than the actual virus ever could have. This isn’t simply the common flu, but there is no reason to clear the shelves of bottled water and toilet paper. It has been blown way out of proportion. By the time this is over the Max will be back and hiring will continue until the next crisis. For the younger pilots on the list, enjoy the experience, you’re going to see it again during your career.
Most of us have already seen it; it’s called age 65.
N6279P is offline  
Old 03-04-2020, 06:26 AM
  #66  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Default

Originally Posted by N6279P
Most of us have already seen it; it’s called age 65.
In my career there was massive industry wide hiring following a period of furloughs. This went right up to 9/11, then furloughs, bankruptcies, massive outsourcing to the regionals, age 65, mergers........ This job is really good up until the day that it isn’t, then after a dark period, it gets really good again. The thing that doesn’t seem to change is how pilots seem to think that the gravy days are the norm, when the volatility of this career actually is. People should arrange their financial house accordingly.
Itsajob is offline  
Old 03-04-2020, 07:26 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 680
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
In my career there was massive industry wide hiring following a period of furloughs. This went right up to 9/11, then furloughs, bankruptcies, massive outsourcing to the regionals, age 65, mergers........ This job is really good up until the day that it isn’t, then after a dark period, it gets really good again. The thing that doesn’t seem to change is how pilots seem to think that the gravy days are the norm, when the volatility of this career actually is. People should arrange their financial house accordingly.
I mostly agree, however.....

Wasn’t the boom in the late 90s and very early 2000s due to growth and not retirements?

Anyone know historically how many mandatory retirements there were from say......1997 to 2001?

The difference with this boom (the last month not withstanding) is that there are massive mandatory retirements, which WILL happen, vs growth which could happen till it stops.
Bahamasflyer is offline  
Old 03-04-2020, 07:48 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Position: 757/767
Posts: 185
Default

Originally Posted by AntiPeter
My apologies if my prediction caused angst, I was attempting to respond to the original question.

I didn’t think that the 70% chance of a furlough prediction in the next 6 months would promote hysteria, given the fact:

35% stock decline
Parked planes
Voluntary leave and reduction measures
Postponed/Cancelled classes
Recalled guidance

Large segments of the population responding irrationally and unpredictability directly affecting our industry and the macroeconomy.

I was reading some quotes from the UN WHO Director yesterday. From what I interpreted he acknowledged the human response to the virus will have more of an impact than the virus itself.

Trying to predict human behavior is very difficult. I’ve spent 25 years in this industry, a furlough would
be a real hardship, to say the least. When humans reject science and rationality bad things happen.

A 70% prediction means there is a 30% chance there won’t be a furlough in 6 months. Hopefully I’ll be wrong, but the original post asked what the chances of a furlough are. I gave it my best shot.

What is your prediction?
so you’re saying there’s a chance!
Deathray is offline  
Old 03-04-2020, 09:28 AM
  #69  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Default

Originally Posted by Bahamasflyer
I mostly agree, however.....

Wasn’t the boom in the late 90s and very early 2000s due to growth and not retirements?

Anyone know historically how many mandatory retirements there were from say......1997 to 2001?

The difference with this boom (the last month not withstanding) is that there are massive mandatory retirements, which WILL happen, vs growth which could happen till it stops.
The hiring wave in the late 90’s was due largely to the dot com economy and growth. I don’t recall the retirement numbers back then, but that was before all of the mergers, so the retirements were spread out between smaller list. We have a bunch of retirements heading our way. Furloughs are very expensive and need to last years to be cost effective. This deal would have to get much worse and be forecast to last for years before a furlough ever becomes a remote possibility. Pilot hiring will be paused for a while, no growth, etc. until this blows over. After that we go full speed until the next crisis.
Itsajob is offline  
Old 03-04-2020, 09:51 AM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Position: Pilot
Posts: 531
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
The hiring wave in the late 90’s was due largely to the dot com economy and growth. I don’t recall the retirement numbers back then, but that was before all of the mergers, so the retirements were spread out between smaller list. We have a bunch of retirements heading our way. Furloughs are very expensive and need to last years to be cost effective. This deal would have to get much worse and be forecast to last for years before a furlough ever becomes a remote possibility. Pilot hiring will be paused for a while, no growth, etc. until this blows over. After that we go full speed until the next crisis.
This website shows UAL will lose 808 pilots due to mandatory retirement in 2020-2021.

At what long-term contraction do you think furloughing would be an increasing possibility? 20% of the pilots right now is about 2,600 pilots. If the airline contracted 20% in the foreseeable future would that warrant a furlough? I'm sure my math is overly simplistic for such a fluid situation and complex business model, but at least for me a rough understanding and using numbers gives me a better feeling than opinions.
AntiPeter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
frotter
Atlas/Polar
20
02-06-2013 12:39 PM
Coto Pilot
United
123
12-04-2012 06:47 PM
Sonny Crockett
United
12
11-15-2012 05:44 PM
Freightpuppy
Cargo
111
06-04-2010 05:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices