Search

Notices

Chance of furlough?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2020, 07:16 AM
  #291  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,860
Default

Originally Posted by domino
https://media.swalife.com/docs/news/...aCaptioned.mp4

Not looking good. Many airlines going bankrupt with this if it drags out longer than 3 months
Max pay to the last day.
JoePatroni is offline  
Old 03-10-2020, 07:50 AM
  #292  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 162
Default

Originally Posted by horrido27
lol.. again with the FEAR.
Kinda like the mortality rate for this this.
Oh my good, it's 2%!
Um.. no it's not. It's 2% of those we know got sick and are listed as such. As O2Pilot already mentioned.. how many have it/had it and it's already run its course.

And lets look at that 2%.
Mostly the elderly and those with immune disorders.
Did you happen to see the report of those who died in WA.
19 died in a nursing home. Somewhere I read the oldest was 90. Some in their 80's and 70's.
19 in a single nursing home is horrific and needs to be investigated as to why the F that happened.
But it goes to show how the numbers are skewed to promote fear.
How about we state this number-
98% survival rate!

You SPECIFICALLY wrote "many airlines going bankrupt".
Give us a few name. Tell us who you think will go bankrupt.
Just like the CV19 and those dying.. if an airline "goes bankrupt" over this, it's because they were unhealthy to begin with. If that does happen to a few smaller BS carriers, it's probably what the owners/management wanted cause it gives them an out. Sucks for the employees but at the end of the day, it is life.

At some point, just like post 9/11, things reset and go back to a 'new' norm.

Enjoy Life!
FS, FP & FtC
Motch
You assume the mortality rate is lower because "many have had it and its run its course..." but you don't take into account people who may have had it and died that were never tested and the cause of death is listed as something else. The WHO are not country bumkins, they actually try and take into account the real mortality rate across all populations. So lets say only half of the country gets exposed to this as it makes its way across the globe. For arguments sake lets use 150 million as half the population. If 98% survive!...that means 3 million people do not. If the South Korean number is accurate 900,000 people are killed. If the mortality rate is as low as .02, then 300,000 people will die. Double those numbers if it spreads to the entire US population. Those are staggering numbers combined with the normal mortality from the seasonal flu and other infectious diseases. This is not a nothing burger as some would have us believe.
With AA cutting its schedule through the summer along with their massive debt load (more than the other legacies combined), there are some nervous people out there.
Lumberg823 is offline  
Old 03-10-2020, 08:13 AM
  #293  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 177
Default

Originally Posted by horrido27
lol.. again with the FEAR.
Kinda like the mortality rate for this this.
Oh my good, it's 2%!
Um.. no it's not. It's 2% of those we know got sick and are listed as such. As O2Pilot already mentioned.. how many have it/had it and it's already run its course.

And lets look at that 2%.
Mostly the elderly and those with immune disorders.
Did you happen to see the report of those who died in WA.
19 died in a nursing home. Somewhere I read the oldest was 90. Some in their 80's and 70's.
19 in a single nursing home is horrific and needs to be investigated as to why the F that happened.
But it goes to show how the numbers are skewed to promote fear.
How about we state this number-
98% survival rate!

You SPECIFICALLY wrote "many airlines going bankrupt".
Give us a few name. Tell us who you think will go bankrupt.
Just like the CV19 and those dying.. if an airline "goes bankrupt" over this, it's because they were unhealthy to begin with. If that does happen to a few smaller BS carriers, it's probably what the owners/management wanted cause it gives them an out. Sucks for the employees but at the end of the day, it is life.

At some point, just like post 9/11, things reset and go back to a 'new' norm.

Enjoy Life!
FS, FP & FtC
Motch
JMO, I think it’s a race between us and American. Because of the condition before this all started, now accelerating. Again just my opinion guess we will see what happens. I sure hope I am 100% wrong.
mmm123 is offline  
Old 03-10-2020, 10:25 AM
  #294  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: 756 Left Side
Posts: 1,629
Default

Originally Posted by Lumberg823
You assume the mortality rate is lower because "many have had it and its run its course..." but you don't take into account people who may have had it and died that were never tested and the cause of death is listed as something else. The WHO are not country bumkins, they actually try and take into account the real mortality rate across all populations. So lets say only half of the country gets exposed to this as it makes its way across the globe. For arguments sake lets use 150 million as half the population. If 98% survive!...that means 3 million people do not. If the South Korean number is accurate 900,000 people are killed. If the mortality rate is as low as .02, then 300,000 people will die. Double those numbers if it spreads to the entire US population. Those are staggering numbers combined with the normal mortality from the seasonal flu and other infectious diseases. This is not a nothing burger as some would have us believe.
With AA cutting its schedule through the summer along with their massive debt load (more than the other legacies combined), there are some nervous people out there.
Guess we will have to agree to disagree.
I actually expect there a chance I could get it. It's a virus and the way people are naturally unclean and having to work when sick.. it's bound to happen.
But I also don't expect to die. Why.. cause for most of us, we have pretty good health care and we are fairly healthy to begin with.
If a local school of 1000 students and 75 faculty has an outbreak.. hmm. Gonna guess that 22 people from that school will not perish. Hell, don't even think they would all come down with it!
If it was super contagious, someone needs to explain to me how all these patients who have flown on aircraft, been on public transportation and have interacted with every day people.. shouldn't they all be infected too?
Hell, the passengers sitting in the vicinity of the patient and the FA's would be high on the list.
wouldn't our FA's then transfer it to the other crew members? US!?

Lets be brutally honest for a second. Most of us have been in this game for many years. We have flown trips and seen sick crewmembers and passengers.. sick people at the airport, at the hotels. But life went on.
Sometimes we got sick ourselves, most times we got lucky. When we did get sick, for the most part we stayed home.

If this is the new norm, that when a new bug pops up and spreads and we need to go into lock down, our planet and global economy is screwed. (BTW, Corona Virus is not new)
Interesting enough, I follow F1 racing.
Chinese race on 17 Apr is postponed.
Race this weekend in Australia, going on!
The Aussie have not put any limits on fans, yet the race in Bahrain the weekend after may be without fans.

Every nation handles crisis differently. Just think we are handling it at an extreme level.

I think back to the last few years here in NJ/NYC area. Blizzards coming! Stock up!! Then.. nothing happens.
Hurricane a coming.. nope, a dud.

At the end, you really don't know what to believe from the media anymore. They 'report' a suspected CV case in the local hospital and then don't follow up if it is positive or negative.
If it is positive, they don't report if the person gets healthy after a few days or weeks.
hmm

But to the topic- Union put out enough good info. Furloughs cost a lot of money and not yet on the horizon.
Could we furlough in the Fall IF life has not gotten back to normal, of course.
Someone once mentioned that there's a break even point for furloughs. 18 to 24 months.
If you feel that we will be dealing with the CV19 going into 2022, so be it.
I don't.

FS, FP & FtC
Motch
horrido27 is offline  
Old 03-10-2020, 10:33 AM
  #295  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: 756 Left Side
Posts: 1,629
Default

Originally Posted by mmm123
JMO, I think it’s a race between us and American. Because of the condition before this all started, now accelerating. Again just my opinion guess we will see what happens. I sure hope I am 100% wrong.
Interesting that you think it's between us and American to see who would/could go bankrupt.
I would think, that before that happens at either carrier, things would have to get a WHOLE lot worse and for a WHOLE long time.

Lets just say this thing lasts till Spring of 2021.. our Government is already talking some sort of relief for the airline/hotel/cruise industry. Hmm..
IF, in a year from now.. we have not recovered, I would expect we will be parking airplanes, offering more COLA's, some sort of Early Out program. At that point, I would suspect Furloughs would happen way before we declare Bankruptcy.
Just my opinion

FS, FP & FtC
Motch
horrido27 is offline  
Old 03-10-2020, 11:15 AM
  #296  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 18
Default

Delta guy posted this from JP Morgan industrial conference. SK summarizes UALs position to investors first 15 minutes, then Q and A for 30 minutes. Last answer addresses furlough possibility.

https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/js6ap6iv
TomC is offline  
Old 03-10-2020, 12:08 PM
  #297  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TSRAGR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Position: They have more than one?
Posts: 167
Default

Originally Posted by TomC
Delta guy posted this from JP Morgan industrial conference. SK summarizes UALs position to investors first 15 minutes, then Q and A for 30 minutes. Last answer addresses furlough possibility.

https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/js6ap6iv
No video, just a link to log-in. What's the answer say? Hope not, maybe, maybe not, possibly, possibly not...?
TSRAGR is offline  
Old 03-10-2020, 12:09 PM
  #298  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 629
Default

Originally Posted by TSRAGR
No video, just a link to log-in. What's the answer say? Hope not, maybe, maybe not, possibly, possibly not...?
Short answer - Probably not. Doing absolutely everything to prevent it.
N6279P is offline  
Old 03-10-2020, 12:13 PM
  #299  
Gets Weekends Off
 
crflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: Airbus
Posts: 505
Default

Says if it gets worse than May, probably going to have to involve labor talks. Priority is to make sure the airline survives, followed by protecting labor.
crflyer is offline  
Old 03-10-2020, 12:24 PM
  #300  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 217
Default

Pretty interesting conf call. SK sounds like he is being blunt and decisive in keeping us afloat. His immediate revenue projections were tough to hear. Essentially he was saying, goal #1 is to survive this short term crisis to make it out alive. Involuntary furloughs would be the last option to ensure goal #1 happens.

I interpreted reducing CAPEX means the uniform is on hold....
Skip0927 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
frotter
Atlas/Polar
20
02-06-2013 12:39 PM
Coto Pilot
United
123
12-04-2012 06:47 PM
Sonny Crockett
United
12
11-15-2012 05:44 PM
Freightpuppy
Cargo
111
06-04-2010 05:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices