Search

Notices

Age 67+ Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2020, 11:40 AM
  #71  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Posts: 1,182
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
Over 59 1/2. Not aware of lawsuit issues.
I think you got some bad info about rollovers from your 401(k). At your age you should be able to move it all...penalty free.

Having said that, I can’t imagine why you would want to unless you want to invest in MLP’s or level 2 options.

I generally suggest pilot roll their former IRA’s , INTO their PRAP..for various reasons.
BMEP100 is offline  
Old 01-29-2020, 12:51 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Thanks for the info. Still learning.
APC225 is offline  
Old 01-29-2020, 07:30 PM
  #73  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Posts: 1,182
Default

I think it safe to assume none of the contracts coming up will have “Early Out” incentives. ☹️
BMEP100 is offline  
Old 01-30-2020, 09:21 AM
  #74  
Get me outta here...
 
HuggyU2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Boeing right seat
Posts: 1,541
Default

Originally Posted by BMEP100
I think it safe to assume none of the contracts coming up will have “Early Out” incentives. ☹️
Why do you say that?
HuggyU2 is offline  
Old 01-30-2020, 09:30 AM
  #75  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Default

Originally Posted by HuggyU2
Why do you say that?
My guess is that with growth and attrition we will be at maximum capacity in the training department and they don’t want to make it worse by encouraging others to leave, especially top widebody pilots. A WB vacancy generates a bunch of training cycles as people move up the ladder.
Itsajob is offline  
Old 01-30-2020, 11:17 AM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,871
Default

Originally Posted by BMEP100
I think it safe to assume none of the contracts coming up will have “Early Out” incentives. �
I see no way to entice a mega senior guy with six weeks of vacation and unused sick time to leave early, at that point it’s a part time job. I don’t see them offering the kind of money it would take for a senior guy to consider it.
JoePatroni is offline  
Old 05-20-2022, 10:26 AM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
massgflight's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 149
Default

Originally Posted by JoePatroni
I see no way to entice a mega senior guy with six weeks of vacation and unused sick time to leave early, at that point it’s a part time job. I don’t see them offering the kind of money it would take for a senior guy to consider it.
I am surprised this thread hasn't already been brought back so here it is. Just an opinion so prepare your quiver & arrows, this is going to happen. It's been in the news, the senate, the arena and they are debating. Bank on it. My question is what do pilots think? As stated in the last comment senior folks are going to love the added 2 years. Top paying, top max contribution into the 401k, possible new contract increasing that. And what is the position of folks regarding the ALPA position, who is fighting this with the below remarks.

Shouldn't we the pilots be able to decide when to quit, retire, or whatever? Sure, medical is out of our control. But if we have a class 1 isn't this why we have 2 folks in the cockpit also? Look forward to the discussion.

"However, the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), the main union representing airline pilots, said the risks of such a plan outweigh the potential advantages."

“Increasing pilot mandatory retirement age beyond 65 increases risk in aviation. According to numerous studies, including one in 2017 by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), cognitive abilities decline with increasing age, and there is an increased risk of cardiovascular issues and diabetes."

This was commentary sent out in an update.
massgflight is offline  
Old 05-20-2022, 11:20 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

MassG, there's a current thread in Majors discussing this: Retirement age 67

FWIW
Andy is offline  
Old 05-20-2022, 02:21 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
Default

I had not heard of it being a discussion. Now that I’m old, I’m for it! Lol, I think honestly I’ll recuse myself from the conversation. I’m good either way. I don’t need to stay. Planning on 60 as was the rule when I started.
sleeves is offline  
Old 05-21-2022, 09:11 AM
  #80  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 39
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
I had not heard of it being a discussion. Now that I’m old, I’m for it! Lol, I think honestly I’ll recuse myself from the conversation. I’m good either way. I don’t need to stay. Planning on 60 as was the rule when I started.

Who in their right mind wants to do this job past 65?
if you haven’t saved enough in the past 30-35 yrs, another 2 yrs won’t help you.
Get a hobby, enjoy your last few years on planet earth.

I vote for age 60 rule to come back.
Vdrive is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brown
Major
115
12-27-2007 08:47 AM
pdo bump
Cargo
70
05-30-2007 07:01 PM
Andy
Major
25
11-20-2006 08:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices