Search

Notices

Contract 2019

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-2020, 10:32 AM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: It's a plane and it's a seat
Posts: 977
Default

Originally Posted by Hatesheavys
Not saying it’s the right answer, but I honestly don’t see them throwing much of our negotiating capital at changing reserve rules. Most of the guys that have been around had much worse rules, and with our retirements and growth, very few people sit reserve unless they choose too. I’m not saying there’s not things they could change, but in the end the way negotiations work, there’s so many dollars to spend, I just don’t see much changing on the reserve front at all.a lot of guys don’t understand the union is working within a cost structure to a new contract, dollars spent in one area can’t be spent in another, so they try to maximize the benefits to the entire pilot group as best possible. That’s the reality of the situation, the other reality is if we want zero give on scope, this will take a while.
So a 5 day block of reserve goes like this: FSB, SC, fly, fly and SC. It’s 1/13 and I already have 6 SC/FSB’s under my belt. All of them assigned.

There has to be changes. Using your logic of those before us had worse work rules... we should go back to worse pay?
flynd94 is offline  
Old 01-13-2020, 11:17 AM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Position: B737 CA
Posts: 114
Default

Originally Posted by flynd94
So a 5 day block of reserve goes like this: FSB, SC, fly, fly and SC. It’s 1/13 and I already have 6 SC/FSB’s under my belt. All of them assigned.

There has to be changes. Using your logic of those before us had worse work rules... we should go back to worse pay?

Did not say say that at all lol, Just said there’s X amount of capital, there not going to pour a tremendous amount into a reserve overhaul. The Unions been pretty clear all along this is an improvement on our contract, not an entire redo. Try being rational and having realistic expectations it will serve you well in life.
Hatesheavys is offline  
Old 01-13-2020, 08:20 PM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,173
Default

Originally Posted by Hatesheavys
Did not say say that at all lol, Just said there’s X amount of capital, there not going to pour a tremendous amount into a reserve overhaul. The Unions been pretty clear all along this is an improvement on our contract, not an entire redo. Try being rational and having realistic expectations it will serve you well in life.
For all you new guys, I will say this again. THERE IS NO X AMOUNT OF CAPITAL for contract improvements. A get in one area DOES NOT MEAN WE HAVE TO GIVE ANYTHING UP!!!

It all comes down to what you can get a the table. Management, AA in particular, is famous for saying there are only X dollars, it's up to the union to split it up. BS.

If all you think is we have to give to get, that's all you will get.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 01-13-2020, 09:10 PM
  #94  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Default

The pie that management wants to carve up is just so big. The size of the pie that they can or will carve up is a different matter. I really don’t care what kind of pie that they want. We are in the best position that we’ve had in decades. I want a big piece of pie, and it better be pecan with a scoop of ice cream too.
Itsajob is offline  
Old 01-13-2020, 09:16 PM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Position: B737 CA
Posts: 114
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
For all you new guys, I will say this again. THERE IS NO X AMOUNT OF CAPITAL for contract improvements. A get in one area DOES NOT MEAN WE HAVE TO GIVE ANYTHING UP!!!

It all comes down to what you can get a the table. Management, AA in particular, is famous for saying there are only X dollars, it's up to the union to split it up. BS.

If all you think is we have to give to get, that's all you will get.
This is why our negotiating committee signs confidentiality agreements, they have access to our companies cost and financial projections. We work in an extremely competitive high capital business, there are limits. And restrictions on scope, like it or not is a negative on future profitability and revenue growth.
Hatesheavys is offline  
Old 01-13-2020, 11:19 PM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LeeFXDWG's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B737 CAPT IAH
Posts: 1,130
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
The pie that management wants to carve up is just so big. The size of the pie that they can or will carve up is a different matter. I really don’t care what kind of pie that they want. We are in the best position that we’ve had in decades. I want a big piece of pie, and it better be pecan with a scoop of ice cream too.
Gets more convoluted since they have differing opinions on what x, y or z “costs”.

Lee
LeeFXDWG is offline  
Old 01-14-2020, 05:42 AM
  #97  
Need More Callouts
 
757Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
The pie that management wants to carve up is just so big. The size of the pie that they can or will carve up is a different matter..
Dislike intensely the supposed “pie” talk. When the cost of fuel goes up does management turn to the suppliers and say, “sorry, our fuel pie is only so big”?

No. we get what we can negotiate and for heavens sake, stop spinning the lame-ass pie story. That tired old phrase has been managing expectations well before I came on property 33 years ago and is meaningless. Yes management sets out to craft a contract that costs them only so much but it’s our job to exceed it and then some.

Shut your Pie-Hole
757Driver is offline  
Old 01-14-2020, 07:09 AM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LeeFXDWG's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B737 CAPT IAH
Posts: 1,130
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
Dislike intensely the supposed “pie” talk. When the cost of fuel goes up does management turn to the suppliers and say, “sorry, our fuel pie is only so big”?

No. we get what we can negotiate and for heavens sake, stop spinning the lame-ass pie story. That tired old phrase has been managing expectations well before I came on property 33 years ago and is meaningless. Yes management sets out to craft a contract that costs them only so much but it’s our job to exceed it and then some.

Shut your Pie-Hole
missing the analogy between purchasing fuel for aircraft and negotiating a contract under the rules of the railway labor act.....

Lee
LeeFXDWG is offline  
Old 01-14-2020, 07:17 AM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,143
Default

Originally Posted by LeeFXDWG
missing the analogy between purchasing fuel for aircraft and negotiating a contract under the rules of the railway labor act.....

Lee
lee,

I think his point(which I suspect you know) is that management doesn’t get to dictate the pie size. It’s our job to extract more than what they want to give. If we just accept their premise of the pie size, we wouldn’t need a bargaining agent. But again, I think you know that.
Guppydriver95 is offline  
Old 01-14-2020, 07:18 AM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bigfatdaddy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 862
Default

Originally Posted by LeeFXDWG
missing the analogy between purchasing fuel for aircraft and negotiating a contract under the rules of the railway labor act.....

Lee
Perhaps 757 guy is “half - baked”
bigfatdaddy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 07:11 PM
Rascal
JetBlue
20
01-25-2018 02:54 PM
jsled
United
7
11-29-2012 12:08 AM
ea500driver
Union Talk
26
06-26-2010 10:54 AM
BoredwLife
Major
1
07-16-2008 02:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices