Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United and JetBlue merger >

United and JetBlue merger

Search

Notices

United and JetBlue merger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2019, 09:45 AM
  #81  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,665
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
Kirby said the only reason we would want them is JFK, and it would be too expensive just to get some gates there. But he also said there might be another way to get JBs gates without buying them. But he didn’t go on and nobody asked him any more.
AA is hardly making use of their slots. I’d imagine UA could buy/lease some from them and maybe even gate space at T8? JB is building an international terminal extension to cover the area currently occupied by T7. They have stated they want to lease out gates to other airlines, so that could be what Kirby was referencing.
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 12-30-2019, 12:47 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Posts: 2,930
Default

Originally Posted by rightside02
Kirby at many charm school events saying it ain’t happening , def means it’s already a done deal.
Yeah I find the two different cultures funny and I’m not trying to be rude. On here anyway guys say kerby said this or that and seem to take him at his word maybe for good reason. As you know in the JetBlue world if any of our “leadership” says anything we thinks it’s a lie and assume the exact opposite.

Tell me again about “organic growth”.

But if you guys have a CEO that actually tells the truth good for you. I wish we had that.
pilotpayne is offline  
Old 12-30-2019, 12:53 PM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Posts: 2,930
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox
ALPA merger policy would be in place for all people currently on the seniority list. The process is very mechanical with a computer program having been used for the last several mergers to create the merged list, and that program uses category and class as the primary driver of the merged list.

The category and classes look like this:
1) widebody captain
2)narrow body captain
3) widebody FO
4)narrowbody FO
5) E190 captain
6) E190 FO
7) furloughed pilots


Now the key factor to understand and the one that throws some folks is that it's not what people are actually holding that matters, but what they WOULD hold if everyone took the highest category and class available to them based on their seniority. As Jetblue has no WB captains, the ALPA program would start slotting them in somewhere around 3000 (approximate number of WB capt slots at UAL) and the bottom would consist of the most junior Jetblue pilots equal to the total number E190 captains and FOs. They would end up on the bottom of the list and the program would slot everyone else somewhere in between depending on the percentages put into the program by the arbitrators. I know, I know I can hear folks rolling their eyes now, but trust me that is how it would work.

Not everyone likes the new system, but it really has taken most of the guess work out of seniority list integration for ALPA carriers.


Here was my guess for my spot during the CAL/UAL merger:



I ended up at 6551.

Yeah that seems right. Nobody is ever going to like anything. And as many have said it’s a slim slimmmm chance. Now if we do start play this game let’s say SWA goes for JetBlue does United sit back at watch or do that try to drive the price up. JetBlue is the company that just does not fit nice with really anyone unless they went full ULCC and merged with Spirit. It’s definitely an odd puzzle piece. But fun to kind of game out where it could go. I don’t worry about it because nobody cares I can’t do anything about it.
pilotpayne is offline  
Old 12-30-2019, 01:40 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: 30 West
Posts: 149
Default

Originally Posted by pilotpayne
Yeah that seems right. Nobody is ever going to like anything. And as many have said it’s a slim slimmmm chance. Now if we do start play this game let’s say SWA goes for JetBlue does United sit back at watch or do that try to drive the price up. JetBlue is the company that just does not fit nice with really anyone unless they went full ULCC and merged with Spirit. It’s definitely an odd puzzle piece. But fun to kind of game out where it could go. I don’t worry about it because nobody cares I can’t do anything about it.
In what kind of world does it seem right that a JetBlue pilot would magically end up a 777/787 Capt after an SLI? We have pilots here at the 20 plus year longevity that are at 8000 on the UAL list with actual wide body Capt expectations. To start slotting a JB pilot into a UAL list at 3000 would be an absolute windfall. There is NO relative seniority in an ALPA merger. It may have seemed that way in the UAL/CAL merger (and other recent mergers) but that was more of a merger of equals. JB and UAL are not equal in anyway.
Learjet driver is offline  
Old 12-30-2019, 01:53 PM
  #85  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,665
Default

Originally Posted by Learjet driver
In what kind of world does it seem right that a JetBlue pilot would magically end up a 777/787 Capt after an SLI? We have pilots here at the 20 plus year longevity that are at 8000 on the UAL list with actual wide body Capt expectations. To start slotting a JB pilot into a UAL list at 3000 would be an absolute windfall. There is NO relative seniority in an ALPA merger. It may have seemed that way in the UAL/CAL merger (and other recent mergers) but that was more of a merger of equals. JB and UAL are not equal in anyway.
Everyone at UAL has widebody expectations, so just staple JB below all of them. Right?

At some point the other pillars of the merger policy kick in. Career expectations are just 1 part of the puzzle.
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 12-30-2019, 02:00 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: 30 West
Posts: 149
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
Everyone at UAL has widebody expectations, so just staple JB below all of them. Right?

At some point the other pillars of the merger policy kick in. Career expectations are just 1 part of the puzzle.
2 out of 3 aren’t bad! Carrier expectations and longevity. Your senior pilots won’t be stapled just slotted in around 9000 on the UAL list. That along with a tall fence will will keep it fair. Do you actually think that we will just roll over and let our wide body jobs just disappear so a JB pilot won’t get his feelings hurt?
Learjet driver is offline  
Old 12-30-2019, 02:08 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

Originally Posted by O2pilot
You’re ignoring the fact that 7,000 UAL pilots have more longevity than 100% of JB pilots. I’d be shocked to see JB #1 end up better than 5,000 on a combined list adding in longevity.

Also we have a huge 757/767 fleet that would be a higher status/category than JB’s Airbus planes.
Yes, I posted earlier in this thread saying that the rumor comes up constantly, but the the point was it has no merit, BUT I was answering a new hires question of where they would fall in a merger because we come here for entertainment and nothing else.

That's the same comment pilots were making during the CAL/UAL SLI negotiations. The program and the rules are pretty much mechanical. Category and Class then you choose a percentage of influence for longevity versus economic expectations. It doesn't change "Category and Class". The arb's do use fences, but a 5 year fence turns out to be meaningless in most folks career.

Last edited by Sunvox; 12-30-2019 at 02:34 PM.
Sunvox is offline  
Old 12-30-2019, 02:12 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: 30 West
Posts: 149
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox
That's the same comment pilots were making during the CAL/UAL SLI negotiations. The program and the rules are pretty much mechanical. Category and Class then you choose a percentage of influence for longevity versus economic expectations. It doesn't change "Category and Class". The arb's do use fences, but a 5 year fence turns out to be meaningless in most folks career.
If this rumor ever comes true please stay as far away from the merger committee as you can!
Learjet driver is offline  
Old 12-30-2019, 02:16 PM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

Originally Posted by Learjet driver
If this rumor ever comes true please stay as far away from the merger committee as you can!
There is no role for a merger committee anymore. The process has been computerized for the foreseeable future/

The system is set in place and my opinion and yours would have no bearing. Your comment is identical to the ones CAL pilots made in 2013 when I told them that the new rules would permit furloughed UAL pilots to be integrated with non-furloughed CAL pilots. That is what happened. It's not about my opinion. It is about how the mechanics of the merger policy and how the computer algorithm works. You can't slot the most senior Jetblue pilot any lower than the bottom of the NBCAP slots.

Last edited by Sunvox; 12-30-2019 at 02:38 PM.
Sunvox is offline  
Old 12-30-2019, 02:35 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 133
Default

As a double furloughee from United that got hammered in the SLI, the only advantage I'd ever see of a JB merger is destroying the unholy alliance JB management has made with Ethiad and Emirates. That, in itself, might be worth another screw job by the arbitrators.

Maybe not, maybe just let Delta bleed JB in Boston with their "near Europe" aspirations.
Freddriver5 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dwane
Major
536
08-08-2021 01:18 PM
benzoate
Major
271
05-10-2013 10:34 AM
Two-percent
Major
73
12-19-2012 05:35 PM
Gman
Major
34
04-12-2007 08:43 PM
LAfrequentflyer
Hangar Talk
2
02-01-2006 05:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices