Cicada

Where did ICUROOK go? Used to be out and in your face.
Some of the F/O s flying with these bone head J/S deniers need to get that T shirt that reads... " I'm With Stupid"

Levigarrett

Not only can you, you must. The only way to respond to a blanket policy is with a blanket response. I have friends at Skywest. I will deny them. I’ve written two LOR for Skywest pilots recently. I can’t fathom doing that going forward. Doesn’t mean it’ll move the needle much but there must be a unified response.

Oma4545

I’ve spent nearly five years at SkyWest trying to be noticed by United. As a captain, this is one of the last things I want to deal with. I already deal with plenty at work and this is just another stressor. I had zero intention of denying anyone but now we are being told the FOM will be changed to exclude United and other carriers. What am I supposed to do? Think of the position I put a new hire FO in should I choose to go against the FOM? Until it is changed, I will not be denying anyone from my jumpseat. I want to move everyone where they need to go, and I want no part in denying anyone a flight to or from their families. They’ve put all of us in a very difficult position and to see people threatening all of us because we work at a certain company has my stomach in knots. United is my dream job and like many others, I have poured my soul into this career trying to make it to my career destination.

Al Czervik

Pathetic that Aric A and your “union” has put thousands in this situation.

TenaciousB

I feel as though many are under the misconception that we voted on this action and or elected the SAPA president that was put into the position by default.

StallWeezy

You must. It’s the only way they’ll learn.

4A20963A-B79F-4F25-94F7-BDCE6CC84970.jpeg

UofM

We don’t. What most are saying is stand up and do/say something about it. You are letting these ass clowns potential ruin an avenue to advance your career.

Bravix

I wouldn't say so, but its one factor among many. Honestly, I don't think any jumpseat denials should be happening, but I'm all for reciprocal OAL status until this is sorted out. Or just agreeing to stop jumpseating on one another, whatever works. Something reciprocal. Frankly, the lack of information (for those out of context, in this case referring to "UAL personnel" in priority) is indicative of the entire approach UALPA has taken. Don't ask questions, you don't need to know and have zero say, just sit down and shut up and be glad that we've blessed you with our scraps.

But hey, maybe all the information has been provided and just hasn't been properly dispersed on our side. If that's the case, my apologies. But with the current "he said she said" going on between UALPA and SAPA, hard to take anyone's word for anything at the moment.

UofM

The reason the UAX exclusive airlines aren’t wholly owned by United is because of the UAL FA contract. If they could with out that additional cost trust me they would in a second. But at the same time, don’t get it twisted. United “owns” the UAX exclusive airlines in the sense United Control’s them. Just like Delta controls Endeavor. So please stop with the semantics. United is asking you to sign the same GD agreement as you did with Delta.

sleeves

It truly is sad. Those at Skywest and Republic should make a lot of noise to have them sign the agreement and get rid of these self serving clods.