Looks like the jumpseat order got changed.
10-11-2019, 08:54 PM
#231
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 427
LOL. I thought someone was showing something signed. I was hoping my MEC didn’t step on it and send out false info.
A flow chart guideline with an ALPA logo isn’t really binding with the 2 non ALPA carriers we’re talking about.
The first line clearly states “for informational purposes only”
So back to “Show us something with the UAL MEC signature”......
A flow chart guideline with an ALPA logo isn’t really binding with the 2 non ALPA carriers we’re talking about.
The first line clearly states “for informational purposes only”
So back to “Show us something with the UAL MEC signature”......
10-11-2019, 09:02 PM
#233
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
10-11-2019, 09:02 PM
#234
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: UAL Guppy CA
Posts: 233
Ok where does it say in this agreement what the priority is for SKW pilots? Skywest and republic are claiming united is violating a reciprocal agreement by changing the priority. All this document does is solidify that a reciprocal agreement does in fact exist. A fact that has not been disputed by the UALMEC.
10-11-2019, 09:03 PM
#235
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
How old is that piece of paper? It has the tulip on the top. If that’s enforceable then let’s go get the 1996 agreement that only allows a few 50 seaters and 146s......
That agreement was made with a pre merger United Airlines.
EDIT: signed in 2001.....lol it’s a smoking gun people. It says right in the document the agreement can be cancelled with 30 days notice. That clock started in May. Turns out you slit your own throats by digging up this relic.
That agreement was made with a pre merger United Airlines.
EDIT: signed in 2001.....lol it’s a smoking gun people. It says right in the document the agreement can be cancelled with 30 days notice. That clock started in May. Turns out you slit your own throats by digging up this relic.
10-11-2019, 09:05 PM
#236
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 427
It's a multi-page document so the priorities could definitely be in there but I don't possess the full, original document.
Ok where does it say in this agreement what the priority is for SKW pilots? Skywest and republic are claiming united is violating a reciprocal agreement by changing the priority. All this document does is solidify that a reciprocal agreement does in fact exist. A fact that has not been disputed by the UALMEC.
10-11-2019, 09:07 PM
#237
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,049
Thank you so much for posting it! Exactly what we’ve all been saying!!! We can ride each other’s JS. We still are offering ours. Skywest and Republic don’t like their priority so they are making it up on the fly and stirring up a hornets nest.
It’s simple to get the CAs name from our company login even when they’re too chicken to face the crew and say no like was happening tonight to our crews in DTW.
It’s going to get interesting.
It’s simple to get the CAs name from our company login even when they’re too chicken to face the crew and say no like was happening tonight to our crews in DTW.
It’s going to get interesting.
10-11-2019, 09:12 PM
#238
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 427
That said, axing two regional partners that account for a large amount of UA's domestic departures would not be beneficial for anyone at all either.
10-11-2019, 09:13 PM
#239
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 215
Thank you so much for posting it! Exactly what we’ve all been saying!!! We can ride each other’s JS. We still are offering ours. Skywest and Republic don’t like their priority so they are making it up on the fly and stirring up a hornets nest.
It’s simple to get the CAs name from our company login even when they’re too chicken to face the crew and say no like was happening tonight to our crews in DTW.
It’s going to get interesting.
It’s simple to get the CAs name from our company login even when they’re too chicken to face the crew and say no like was happening tonight to our crews in DTW.
It’s going to get interesting.
The only people I see that are really against taking UAL/UAX jumpseaters appear to be very senior lifers. I don’t think taking down their names is going to have as big of an effect as you would think
10-11-2019, 09:19 PM
#240
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,049
Even if people are going to follow what SAPA is saying nothing should be starting today anyway.
The only people I see that are really against taking UAL/UAX jumpseaters appear to be very senior lifers. I don’t think taking down their names is going to have as big of an effect as you would think
The only people I see that are really against taking UAL/UAX jumpseaters appear to be very senior lifers. I don’t think taking down their names is going to have as big of an effect as you would think
On our non scab forum there are numerous reports of pilots being denied JSs tonight. I don’t commute DTW-ORD so no idea what UAX carrier it was so not pointing fingers. Just that games are already being done and apparently some are too afraid to actually say no to the pilots face so they gave a letter to the CS and told them not to be listed at all. Which again is against UAL company policy for the CSR so they’re put in bad situation by a weak captain. (Yes we even have CSR names in our system for each Flt with pics on our EFB).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
