Search

Notices

Oil's up.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-2019, 10:06 AM
  #61  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: 737
Posts: 257
Default

Originally Posted by JoePatroni
After reading that, do you honestly believe the company could give all of our upcoming 787 deliveries to COPA AND have them operate them FOR us? That is a fantasy.
It’s funny, I bed a lot of Delta guys shared the same opinion before the Aeromexico JV
Bluewaffle is offline  
Old 10-23-2019, 10:12 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,860
Default

Originally Posted by Bluewaffle
It’s funny, I bed a lot of Delta guys shared the same opinion before the Aeromexico JV
Their international scope section was not even close to our’s, you are being buttered up for more RJ’s. Read 1-C-3 and you tell me where there is even the remote sliver of leeway to do as you claim can be done at anytime.
JoePatroni is offline  
Old 10-23-2019, 10:21 AM
  #63  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: 737
Posts: 257
Default

Originally Posted by JoePatroni
Their international scope section was not even close to our’s, you are being buttered up for more RJ’s. Read 1-C-3 and you tell me where there is even the remote sliver of leeway to do as you claim can be done at anytime.
Their section 1 is almost identical to ours.
Bluewaffle is offline  
Old 10-23-2019, 10:55 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 312
Default

Originally Posted by Bluewaffle
Their section 1 is almost identical to ours.
Yep, and here we go!

https://hub.united.com/2019-10-23-united-airlines-and-air-new-zealand-announce-first-ever-nonstop-service-between-new-york-newark-and-auckland-new-zealand-2641076365.html#__prclt=3Fn4UrCw
Vernon Demerest is offline  
Old 10-23-2019, 11:19 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,860
Default

Originally Posted by Bluewaffle
Their section 1 is almost identical to ours.
"Almost?" I ask again, if you read our scope section that pertains to international JV's and code shares...do you honestly believe this company could legally have COPA operate a number of our 787's FOR United? If you actually believe that, why haven't they done it already? Don't you find it odd that you never heard a peep about this until this MEC cornered themselves?

Here it is:

1-C-3 Foreign Air Carrier Code Share Agreements
In any Rolling Twelve-Month Period the Company shall not Schedule or permit the Scheduling of aggregate ASMs of Foreign Code Share Flying operated by any Foreign Air Carrier that is not party to a Revenue Share Agreement with the Company or Company Affiliate between the United States and Territories and a Foreign Airport exceeding 125% of the aggregate Scheduled ASMs of Company Flying bearing that Foreign Air Carrier’s Designator Code. Further, the Company or a Company Affiliate may enter into or maintain Code Share Agreements and Revenue Share Agreements with Foreign Air Carriers that permit such carriers to utilize the Company’s Designator Code on such carriers’ Flights between the United States and Territories and Foreign Airports or between two Foreign Airports (“Foreign Code Share Flying”) only in accordance with Sections 1- C-3-a through 1-C-3-c. For clarification purposes, the first sentence of Section 1-C-3applies to a Foreign Code Share Agreement where there is no Revenue Share Agreement; Sections 1-C-3-a, 1- C-3-b-(1), and 1-C-3-b-(2) apply to Flights operated under either a Foreign Code Share Agreement or a Revenue Share Agreement with a Foreign Air Carrier, and Sections 1-C-3-b-(3) and 1-C-3-c apply where the Flights are operated under both a Foreign Code Share Agreement and a Revenue Share Agreement with the applicable Foreign Air Carrier.
1-C-3-a Geographical Limits
The Company shall not Schedule or permit the Scheduling of Foreign Code Share Flying from or to a Company Hub unless the other airport in the Market (i) is a Hub of the applicable Foreign Air Carrier (including such carrier’s Foreign Air Carrier Affiliates) outside the United States or (ii) is another Foreign Airport in a country which contains a Hub of such Foreign Air Carrier (including such carrier’s Foreign Air Carrier Affiliates).
1-C-3-b Flying Ratios
1-C-3-b-(1) For each Foreign Air Carrier which is a party to a Code Share Agreement, with respect to International Routes on which the Company has scheduled service, a differential (the “Foreign Air Carrier Flight Differential”) will be determined by comparing the average number of scheduled Flights per day operated on an International Route by the Company with the average number of scheduled Flights per day operated on the same International Route by the Foreign Air Carrier (including Flights operated by Affiliates of such Foreign Air Carrier) either:
1-C-3-b-(1)-(a) During the twelve (12) full calendar months immediately prior to the effective date of this Agreement (if the Foreign Air Carrier was a party to a Code Share Agreement on the effective date of this Agreement), or
UPA 2018 Rewrite
***FOR REFERENCE ONLY - AUGUST 15, 2018***
1-C-3-b-(1)-(b) During the twelve (12) full calendar months immediately prior to the effective date of the Code Share Agreement with the Foreign Air Carrier (if the Foreign Air Carrier was not a party to a Code Share Agreement on the effective date of this Agreement).
1-C-3-b-(2) The Company may not place its Designator Code on any Foreign Air Carrier Flight on the shared International Route which would exceed the Differential number of Flights by more than two (2) (also accounting for the number of such Flights of the Company in this Market bearing the Foreign Air Carrier’s Designator Code and accounting for the number of Flights of the Affiliates of the Foreign Air Carrier in this Market).
1-C-3-b-(2)-(a) For example, if the Company had two (2) regularly scheduled daily Flights and the Foreign Air Carrier and its Affiliates had six (6) between EWR and CDG during the applicable twelve-month measurement period in Section 1-C-3-b-(1), the Foreign Air Carrier Flight Differential would be four (4).
1-C-3-b-(2)-(b) If during a subsequent Rolling Twelve-Month Period the Company had three (3) flights between EWR and CDG, all with the Foreign Air Carrier’s Designator Code, then the Company could place its Designator Code on a maximum of nine (9) of the Foreign Air Carrier Flights between EWR and CDG. This maximum of nine (9) of the Foreign Air Carrier Flights between EWR and CDG in this example is derived by adding 4 (the Foreign Air Carrier Flight Differential) plus 3 (the number of Company Flights bearing the Foreign Air Carrier’s Designator Code) plus two (2) (the Section 1-C-3-b-(2) limit).
1-C-3-b-(3) In the event the Company or a Company Affiliate enters into or maintains a Revenue Share Agreement with one or more Foreign Air Carriers, the Scheduled block hours of Company Flying between the United States and Territories and the foreign country or countries covered by the applicable Revenue Share Agreement in each Rolling Twelve-Month Period shall be not less than ninety percent (90%) of the Scheduled block hours of Company Flying between the United States and Territories and foreign countries covered by the applicable Revenue Share Agreement either:
1-C-3-b-(3)-(a) During the twelve (12) full calendar months immediately prior to the effective date of this Agreement (if the Foreign Air Carrier was a party to a Revenue Share Agreement on the effective date of this Agreement) (a “Base Period”), or
1-C-3-b-(3)-(b) During the twelve (12) full calendar months immediately prior to the effective date of the Revenue Share Agreement with the Foreign Air Carrier (if the Foreign Air Carrier was not a party to a Revenue Share Agreement on the effective date of this Agreement) (a “Base Period”).
1-C-3-b-(4) If the aggregate of Scheduled block hours flown between the United States and Territories and Foreign Airports within the geographic scope of the applicable Revenue Share Agreement by all Domestic Air Carriers (excluding Company Flying) decreases during a Rolling Twelve-Month Period in comparison to the applicable Base Period, the percentage required by Section 1-C-3-b-(3) for that Rolling Twelve-Month Period shall be
UPA 2018 Rewrite

***FOR REFERENCE ONLY - AUGUST 15, 2018***
reduced by fifty percent (50%) of the percentage of that decrease in Scheduled block hours.
1-C-3-c Revenue Limitations Under Revenue Share Agreements with Foreign Air Carriers
Measured on a Rolling Twelve-Month basis for each Revenue Share Agreement, the Company’s revenue from that Revenue Share Agreement associated with Flights that are 1) operated by the Company between the United States and Territories and Foreign Airports or between Foreign Airports, and 2) covered by the applicable Revenue Share Agreement, shall not exceed 130% of the total revenue onboard Company Flights that are 1) operated by the Company between the United States and Territories and Foreign Airports or between Foreign Airports, and 2) covered by the applicable Revenue Share Agreement. For purposes of this provision, total revenue onboard Company Flights equals the prorated segment passenger revenue as recognized by the Company’s business revenue accounting systems used in the Company’s public reports.
For example, if, during a Rolling Twelve-Month period, 1) total revenue onboard Company Flights between the United States and Foreign Airports or between Foreign Airports covered by a Revenue Share Agreement equals $5.872B, and 2) the Company receives an additional $100M under the applicable Revenue Share Agreement associated with these same Flights (meaning that the Company receives total revenue under the Revenue Share Agreement associated with these Flights of $5.972B), then 3) the percentage of the Company’s revenue associated with these Flights under the Revenue Share Agreement ($5.972B) would be 101.7% of the Company’s onboard revenue for these Flights ($5.872B), because $5.972B divided by $5.872B results in 101.7%. Since this 101.7% would be smaller than the 130% limit, the Company in this example would be in compliance with Section 1-C-3-c.
As another example: if, during a Rolling Twelve-Month period, 1) there are no Company Flights covered by a Revenue Share Agreement, meaning that total revenue onboard Company Flights under this Revenue Share Agreement equals $0, then 2) the Company may not receive any revenue under the applicable Revenue Share Agreement, because the Company receipt of such revenue would exceed the 130% limit in Section 1-C-3-c.
1-C-3-d Identity
The Company shall maintain a separate identity from Foreign Air Carriers engaged in Foreign Code Share Flying to the same extent as required in Section 1-C-2-d in regard to Domestic Code Share Carriers.
1-C-3-e Cabotage
The Company shall join the Association in strongly opposing any changes in U.S. law that would permit Foreign Air Carriers to engage in cabotage. If U.S. law is changed to permit cabotage, the Company shall not allow its Designator Code to be used on Flights of Foreign Air Carriers carrying local revenue passengers or cargo or mail traffic between airports within the United States and Territories.
1-C-3-f Control
UPA 2018 Rewrite

***FOR REFERENCE ONLY - AUGUST 15, 2018***
Without limitation to any other restriction set forth in this Section 1 and only as a clarification regarding limits on Company operations under this Section 1, the Company shall not continue any portion of an existing agreement or arrangement, or enter into any new agreement or arrangement, for creation of a new Foreign Air Carrier over which the Company has Control, and which operates Flights between the United States and Territories and any Foreign Airport (e.g., Aer Lingus joint venture).
1-C-4 Block Space
The Company may enter into block space arrangements with other carriers (i.e., the advance
purchase or reservation of blocks of seats on other carriers for resale by the Company) only:
1-C-4-a On flights which carry the Company’s Designator Code pursuant to Sections 1-C-1, 1- C-2 and 1-C-3, provided that the right to enter into block space arrangements does not override any restrictions in any of those Sections and may only be implemented to the extent consistent with such Sections;
1-C-4-b On a limited number of occasions where United Vacations or Mileage Plus from time to time purchases block seats in order to provide connecting service as part of group vacation packages where such service or seats on such service are not available from the Company; or
1-C-4-c On other occasions, limited in number and consistent with the Company’s limited practices as of the effective date of this Agreement, where the Company from time to time purchases seats for connecting passengers over routes on which the Company does not maintain operating authority.
1-C-5 Enforcement
1-C-5-a If in any three (3) consecutive calendar month period following the applicable date, the Flight Differential, block hour percentage, or ASM ratio requirements of Sections 1-C-2-c- (1), 1-C-2-c-(2), 1-C-3, 1-C-3-b-(2), or 1-C-3-b-(3) are not satisfied, then the Company shall promptly take any of the following actions as applicable within ninety (90) days of the date the Association notifies the Company that it has not satisfied the applicable requirement:
1-C-5-a-(1) Add or delete the Company Designator Code to or from one or more Flights of the applicable air carrier(s), or
1-C-5-a-(2) Add or delete the applicable air carrier’s Designator Code to or from the applicable Company Flights, or
1-C-5-a-(3) Add Company Flying.
1-C-5-b The Company shall be excused from compliance with Sections 1-C-2-c-(1), 1-C-2-c-(2), 1-C-3, 1-C-3-b-(2), or 1-C-3-b-(3) for the period of time that a Circumstance Beyond the Company's Control is the cause of such non-compliance.
1-C-5-c If the Company, a Domestic Code Share Carrier or a Foreign Air Carrier merges with another air carrier so as to form a single carrier with a single pilot seniority list and a single pilot collective bargaining agreement, the ASM Ratios, the Hub ASM Ratios and the Foreign Air Carrier Flight Differential provided for in Sections 1-C-2-c-(1), 1-C-2-c-(2), 1-C-3, 1-C-3-b- (2), or 1-C-3-b-(3), shall be appropriately adjusted by adding the relevant numbers of the other
UPA 2018 Rewrite

***FOR REFERENCE ONLY - AUGUST 15, 2018***
air carrier party to the merger (and any flights of Domestic Code Share Flying scheduled to be operated by the Domestic Code Share Carrier in aircraft other than Regional Aircraft whose ASMs are counted as Domestic Code Share Carrier ASMs pursuant to Sections 1-C-2-c-(1) or 1-C-2-c-(2)) to the relevant numbers of the Company or the Domestic Code Share Carrier, as the case may be, with such numbers to be measured during the twelve (12) full calendar months immediately prior to the effective date of the merger. In connection with such adjustment, in addition to the other carrier’s Hubs and Company Hubs, each Hub of the air carrier party to the merger shall be considered a Company Hub or a Hub of the other carrier, as the case may be, if such air carrier scheduled during any month in such six month period an average of fifty (50) or more daily departures therefrom.

Last edited by JoePatroni; 10-23-2019 at 11:40 AM.
JoePatroni is offline  
Old 10-23-2019, 12:36 PM
  #66  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: 737
Posts: 257
Default

Originally Posted by JoePatroni
"Almost?" I ask again, if you read our scope section that pertains to international JV's and code shares...do you honestly believe this company could legally have COPA operate a number of our 787's FOR United? If you actually believe that, why haven't they done it already? Don't you find it odd that you never heard a peep about this until this MEC cornered themselves?

Here it is:

1-C-3 Foreign Air Carrier Code Share Agreements
In any Rolling Twelve-Month Period the Company shall not Schedule or permit the Scheduling of aggregate ASMs of Foreign Code Share Flying operated by any Foreign Air Carrier that is not party to a Revenue Share Agreement with the Company or Company Affiliate between the United States and Territories and a Foreign Airport exceeding 125% of the aggregate Scheduled ASMs of Company Flying bearing that Foreign Air Carrier’s Designator Code. Further, the Company or a Company Affiliate may enter into or maintain Code Share Agreements and Revenue Share Agreements with Foreign Air Carriers that permit such carriers to utilize the Company’s Designator Code on such carriers’ Flights between the United States and Territories and Foreign Airports or between two Foreign Airports (“Foreign Code Share Flying”) only in accordance with Sections 1- C-3-a through 1-C-3-c. For clarification purposes, the first sentence of Section 1-C-3applies to a Foreign Code Share Agreement where there is no Revenue Share Agreement; Sections 1-C-3-a, 1- C-3-b-(1), and 1-C-3-b-(2) apply to Flights operated under either a Foreign Code Share Agreement or a Revenue Share Agreement with a Foreign Air Carrier, and Sections 1-C-3-b-(3) and 1-C-3-c apply where the Flights are operated under both a Foreign Code Share Agreement and a Revenue Share Agreement with the applicable Foreign Air Carrier.
1-C-3-a Geographical Limits
The Company shall not Schedule or permit the Scheduling of Foreign Code Share Flying from or to a Company Hub unless the other airport in the Market (i) is a Hub of the applicable Foreign Air Carrier (including such carrier’s Foreign Air Carrier Affiliates) outside the United States or (ii) is another Foreign Airport in a country which contains a Hub of such Foreign Air Carrier (including such carrier’s Foreign Air Carrier Affiliates).
1-C-3-b Flying Ratios
1-C-3-b-(1) For each Foreign Air Carrier which is a party to a Code Share Agreement, with respect to International Routes on which the Company has scheduled service, a differential (the “Foreign Air Carrier Flight Differential”) will be determined by comparing the average number of scheduled Flights per day operated on an International Route by the Company with the average number of scheduled Flights per day operated on the same International Route by the Foreign Air Carrier (including Flights operated by Affiliates of such Foreign Air Carrier) either:
1-C-3-b-(1)-(a) During the twelve (12) full calendar months immediately prior to the effective date of this Agreement (if the Foreign Air Carrier was a party to a Code Share Agreement on the effective date of this Agreement), or
UPA 2018 Rewrite
***FOR REFERENCE ONLY - AUGUST 15, 2018***
1-C-3-b-(1)-(b) During the twelve (12) full calendar months immediately prior to the effective date of the Code Share Agreement with the Foreign Air Carrier (if the Foreign Air Carrier was not a party to a Code Share Agreement on the effective date of this Agreement).
1-C-3-b-(2) The Company may not place its Designator Code on any Foreign Air Carrier Flight on the shared International Route which would exceed the Differential number of Flights by more than two (2) (also accounting for the number of such Flights of the Company in this Market bearing the Foreign Air Carrier’s Designator Code and accounting for the number of Flights of the Affiliates of the Foreign Air Carrier in this Market).
1-C-3-b-(2)-(a) For example, if the Company had two (2) regularly scheduled daily Flights and the Foreign Air Carrier and its Affiliates had six (6) between EWR and CDG during the applicable twelve-month measurement period in Section 1-C-3-b-(1), the Foreign Air Carrier Flight Differential would be four (4).
1-C-3-b-(2)-(b) If during a subsequent Rolling Twelve-Month Period the Company had three (3) flights between EWR and CDG, all with the Foreign Air Carrier’s Designator Code, then the Company could place its Designator Code on a maximum of nine (9) of the Foreign Air Carrier Flights between EWR and CDG. This maximum of nine (9) of the Foreign Air Carrier Flights between EWR and CDG in this example is derived by adding 4 (the Foreign Air Carrier Flight Differential) plus 3 (the number of Company Flights bearing the Foreign Air Carrier’s Designator Code) plus two (2) (the Section 1-C-3-b-(2) limit).
1-C-3-b-(3) In the event the Company or a Company Affiliate enters into or maintains a Revenue Share Agreement with one or more Foreign Air Carriers, the Scheduled block hours of Company Flying between the United States and Territories and the foreign country or countries covered by the applicable Revenue Share Agreement in each Rolling Twelve-Month Period shall be not less than ninety percent (90%) of the Scheduled block hours of Company Flying between the United States and Territories and foreign countries covered by the applicable Revenue Share Agreement either:
1-C-3-b-(3)-(a) During the twelve (12) full calendar months immediately prior to the effective date of this Agreement (if the Foreign Air Carrier was a party to a Revenue Share Agreement on the effective date of this Agreement) (a “Base Period”), or
1-C-3-b-(3)-(b) During the twelve (12) full calendar months immediately prior to the effective date of the Revenue Share Agreement with the Foreign Air Carrier (if the Foreign Air Carrier was not a party to a Revenue Share Agreement on the effective date of this Agreement) (a “Base Period”).
1-C-3-b-(4) If the aggregate of Scheduled block hours flown between the United States and Territories and Foreign Airports within the geographic scope of the applicable Revenue Share Agreement by all Domestic Air Carriers (excluding Company Flying) decreases during a Rolling Twelve-Month Period in comparison to the applicable Base Period, the percentage required by Section 1-C-3-b-(3) for that Rolling Twelve-Month Period shall be
UPA 2018 Rewrite

***FOR REFERENCE ONLY - AUGUST 15, 2018***
reduced by fifty percent (50%) of the percentage of that decrease in Scheduled block hours.
1-C-3-c Revenue Limitations Under Revenue Share Agreements with Foreign Air Carriers
Measured on a Rolling Twelve-Month basis for each Revenue Share Agreement, the Company’s revenue from that Revenue Share Agreement associated with Flights that are 1) operated by the Company between the United States and Territories and Foreign Airports or between Foreign Airports, and 2) covered by the applicable Revenue Share Agreement, shall not exceed 130% of the total revenue onboard Company Flights that are 1) operated by the Company between the United States and Territories and Foreign Airports or between Foreign Airports, and 2) covered by the applicable Revenue Share Agreement. For purposes of this provision, total revenue onboard Company Flights equals the prorated segment passenger revenue as recognized by the Company’s business revenue accounting systems used in the Company’s public reports.
For example, if, during a Rolling Twelve-Month period, 1) total revenue onboard Company Flights between the United States and Foreign Airports or between Foreign Airports covered by a Revenue Share Agreement equals $5.872B, and 2) the Company receives an additional $100M under the applicable Revenue Share Agreement associated with these same Flights (meaning that the Company receives total revenue under the Revenue Share Agreement associated with these Flights of $5.972B), then 3) the percentage of the Company’s revenue associated with these Flights under the Revenue Share Agreement ($5.972B) would be 101.7% of the Company’s onboard revenue for these Flights ($5.872B), because $5.972B divided by $5.872B results in 101.7%. Since this 101.7% would be smaller than the 130% limit, the Company in this example would be in compliance with Section 1-C-3-c.
As another example: if, during a Rolling Twelve-Month period, 1) there are no Company Flights covered by a Revenue Share Agreement, meaning that total revenue onboard Company Flights under this Revenue Share Agreement equals $0, then 2) the Company may not receive any revenue under the applicable Revenue Share Agreement, because the Company receipt of such revenue would exceed the 130% limit in Section 1-C-3-c.
1-C-3-d Identity
The Company shall maintain a separate identity from Foreign Air Carriers engaged in Foreign Code Share Flying to the same extent as required in Section 1-C-2-d in regard to Domestic Code Share Carriers.
1-C-3-e Cabotage
The Company shall join the Association in strongly opposing any changes in U.S. law that would permit Foreign Air Carriers to engage in cabotage. If U.S. law is changed to permit cabotage, the Company shall not allow its Designator Code to be used on Flights of Foreign Air Carriers carrying local revenue passengers or cargo or mail traffic between airports within the United States and Territories.
1-C-3-f Control
UPA 2018 Rewrite

***FOR REFERENCE ONLY - AUGUST 15, 2018***
Without limitation to any other restriction set forth in this Section 1 and only as a clarification regarding limits on Company operations under this Section 1, the Company shall not continue any portion of an existing agreement or arrangement, or enter into any new agreement or arrangement, for creation of a new Foreign Air Carrier over which the Company has Control, and which operates Flights between the United States and Territories and any Foreign Airport (e.g., Aer Lingus joint venture).
1-C-4 Block Space
The Company may enter into block space arrangements with other carriers (i.e., the advance
purchase or reservation of blocks of seats on other carriers for resale by the Company) only:
1-C-4-a On flights which carry the Company’s Designator Code pursuant to Sections 1-C-1, 1- C-2 and 1-C-3, provided that the right to enter into block space arrangements does not override any restrictions in any of those Sections and may only be implemented to the extent consistent with such Sections;
1-C-4-b On a limited number of occasions where United Vacations or Mileage Plus from time to time purchases block seats in order to provide connecting service as part of group vacation packages where such service or seats on such service are not available from the Company; or
1-C-4-c On other occasions, limited in number and consistent with the Company’s limited practices as of the effective date of this Agreement, where the Company from time to time purchases seats for connecting passengers over routes on which the Company does not maintain operating authority.
1-C-5 Enforcement
1-C-5-a If in any three (3) consecutive calendar month period following the applicable date, the Flight Differential, block hour percentage, or ASM ratio requirements of Sections 1-C-2-c- (1), 1-C-2-c-(2), 1-C-3, 1-C-3-b-(2), or 1-C-3-b-(3) are not satisfied, then the Company shall promptly take any of the following actions as applicable within ninety (90) days of the date the Association notifies the Company that it has not satisfied the applicable requirement:
1-C-5-a-(1) Add or delete the Company Designator Code to or from one or more Flights of the applicable air carrier(s), or
1-C-5-a-(2) Add or delete the applicable air carrier’s Designator Code to or from the applicable Company Flights, or
1-C-5-a-(3) Add Company Flying.
1-C-5-b The Company shall be excused from compliance with Sections 1-C-2-c-(1), 1-C-2-c-(2), 1-C-3, 1-C-3-b-(2), or 1-C-3-b-(3) for the period of time that a Circumstance Beyond the Company's Control is the cause of such non-compliance.
1-C-5-c If the Company, a Domestic Code Share Carrier or a Foreign Air Carrier merges with another air carrier so as to form a single carrier with a single pilot seniority list and a single pilot collective bargaining agreement, the ASM Ratios, the Hub ASM Ratios and the Foreign Air Carrier Flight Differential provided for in Sections 1-C-2-c-(1), 1-C-2-c-(2), 1-C-3, 1-C-3-b- (2), or 1-C-3-b-(3), shall be appropriately adjusted by adding the relevant numbers of the other
UPA 2018 Rewrite

***FOR REFERENCE ONLY - AUGUST 15, 2018***
air carrier party to the merger (and any flights of Domestic Code Share Flying scheduled to be operated by the Domestic Code Share Carrier in aircraft other than Regional Aircraft whose ASMs are counted as Domestic Code Share Carrier ASMs pursuant to Sections 1-C-2-c-(1) or 1-C-2-c-(2)) to the relevant numbers of the Company or the Domestic Code Share Carrier, as the case may be, with such numbers to be measured during the twelve (12) full calendar months immediately prior to the effective date of the merger. In connection with such adjustment, in addition to the other carrier’s Hubs and Company Hubs, each Hub of the air carrier party to the merger shall be considered a Company Hub or a Hub of the other carrier, as the case may be, if such air carrier scheduled during any month in such six month period an average of fifty (50) or more daily departures therefrom.
Operate our 787s? No, I never Said that. With a JV, they wouldn’t have to. The majority of future flying would just go to the carrier that United has a minority stake in. This is about protecting future flying. There’s nothing in the section you just referenced that prevents that in its entirety.
Bluewaffle is offline  
Old 10-23-2019, 01:10 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,860
Default

Originally Posted by Bluewaffle
Operate our 787s? No, I never Said that. With a JV, they wouldn’t have to. The majority of future flying would just go to the carrier that United has a minority stake in. This is about protecting future flying. There’s nothing in the section you just referenced that prevents that in its entirety.
You didn't say it but that's EXACTLY what P2P reps are telling people. Did you read the scope section? How exactly do you see a "majority" of flying going anywhere?

I seriously hope I am wrong as hell but, my opinion only, there are way too many signs pointing to caving on more RJ's. I will be happy to eat my words but I don't think that's going to happen. We'll see soon enough.

By the way, it's your contention that United can buy a minority stake in Avianca and then let them fly unlimited flights for United? If that's incorrect, how about an example of what you think could happen.
JoePatroni is offline  
Old 10-23-2019, 02:02 PM
  #68  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: 737
Posts: 257
Default

Originally Posted by JoePatroni
You didn't say it but that's EXACTLY what P2P reps are telling people. Did you read the scope section? How exactly do you see a "majority" of flying going anywhere?

I seriously hope I am wrong as hell but, my opinion only, there are way too many signs pointing to caving on more RJ's. I will be happy to eat my words but I don't think that's going to happen. We'll see soon enough.

By the way, it's your contention that United can buy a minority stake in Avianca and then let them fly unlimited flights for United? If that's incorrect, how about an example of what you think could happen.
How many flights to Auckland have we added since the JV with Air New Zealand? Almost every single new departure from one of our hubs to that country is operated by them. That agreement was singed in 2016. Do I want more RJs? No, absolutely not. Our current contract gives them more. All they have to do is buy a E195 E2 and then they have them. Problem is, that plane seats 120 people. Almost as much as a 319 or 737-700. So what is our current contract getting us? More RJs and a new 120 seat jet that facilitates the retirement of our oldest/smallest 737s? How is that better?
Bluewaffle is offline  
Old 10-23-2019, 02:19 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,860
Default

Originally Posted by Bluewaffle
How many flights to Auckland have we added since the JV with Air New Zealand? Almost every single new departure from one of our hubs to that country is operated by them. That agreement was singed in 2016. Do I want more RJs? No, absolutely not. Our current contract gives them more. All they have to do is buy a E195 E2 and then they have them. Problem is, that plane seats 120 people. Almost as much as a 319 or 737-700. So what is our current contract getting us? More RJs and a new 120 seat jet that facilitates the retirement of our oldest/smallest 737s? How is that better?
That agreement was signed as the 747 fleet was being parked, I would guess that a lack of airframes contributed to it. Two or three flights does not prove the narrative the current MEC is trying to sell. Are you willing to give anything up so they can get bigger RJ’s? I am not.
JoePatroni is offline  
Old 10-23-2019, 02:30 PM
  #70  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: 737
Posts: 257
Default

Originally Posted by JoePatroni
That agreement was signed as the 747 fleet was being parked, I would guess that a lack of airframes contributed to it. Two or three flights does not prove the narrative the current MEC is trying to sell. Are you willing to give anything up so they can get bigger RJ’s? I am not.
Bigger RJs, no? They are and will be limited to 76 seats hopefully. What I can see is a revised ratio of RJs to mainline Narrow bodies. The more mainline NB jets we get, the more RJs the contract will allow. There must be built in protections though. If we furlough and return a bunch of jets to the lessor, they must remove the RJs proportionally. Our pilots must have protections as well. If “Aviate” can eventually flow pilots directly to mainline, the reverse must also be true.
Bluewaffle is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wasatch Phantom
Major
12
08-19-2008 04:04 AM
Scooter2525
Major
31
02-27-2008 01:57 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices