United A-319 Emergency return to EWR
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
You just ground a wheel assembly down to the axle. Your brakes are molten and the entire assembly is hotter than the hinges of hell. You know there is flammable hydraulic fluid down there with very good chances of it leaking onto something hot. I don’t know how you think that doesn’t cause smoke but there is smoke clearly visible from the main gear while looking out the first row in coach from the video posted online by a passenger (passenger also took his carry on with him down the slide). They kept it on the runway, 13 minor injuries, and the plane will probably be flying again by the end of the week. I think you owe that whole crew an apology.
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 293
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,265
Uh, not even close. It costs tens if not hundreds of thousands of dollars and puts passengers at risk, sometimes serious risk. You think blowing slides on a full boat, especially a widebody is a freebie and no questions will be asked you have another thing coming.
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
The decision to evacuate is an easier one if you fully know and understand the status of your aircraft. For sure on fire. But, when there's doubt or incomplete information you may delay, or second guess yourself.
Most injuries occur during the evacuation itself. The idea is to expose the passengers to the least amount of risk.
Yes there will be questions asked in both scenarios: obvious need to evacuate, and not-so-obvious feeling of need to evacuate.
I do agree that it the area of risk mitigation it's an area that isn't going to be questioned for very long. You explain yourself, what you knew, what you didn't know and why you decided to use your Emergency Authority.
"I felt it that in interest of safety and an abundance of caution that I was compelled to order an evacuation as it was the safest and most prudent course of action with the information that I knew and had available and that I felt the decision to evacuate would expose my crew and passengers to the least amount of risk possible."
The world is full of crew room lawyers. We've got some actual bonafide ones at ALPA. They do a great job.
#17
But the pendulum swung, my last airline actually asked us to be a little more judicious since pax were getting injured during evacs for spurious computer warnings with no actual signs of smoke/fire, funny smells from the packs, etc.
They actually gave us an optional "expedited deplaning" procedure through the main door (on types that had stairs). I used that once, worked fine and nobody got hurt.
Yes, presumably they had a reason, apparent to them if not to the news media.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,319
You just ground a wheel assembly down to the axle. Your brakes are molten and the entire assembly is hotter than the hinges of hell. You know there is flammable hydraulic fluid down there with very good chances of it leaking onto something hot. I don’t know how you think that doesn’t cause smoke but there is smoke clearly visible from the main gear while looking out the first row in coach from the video posted online by a passenger (passenger also took his carry on with him down the slide). They kept it on the runway, 13 minor injuries, and the plane will probably be flying again by the end of the week. I think you owe that whole crew an apology.
https://youtu.be/OetGcnfV0NM
https://youtu.be/OetGcnfV0NM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: Retired NJA & AA
Posts: 2,013
My Air Force Unit Commander had to evac an Eastern Airlines L-1011 after it landed in Panama and the right main gear collapsed. It was at night. The jet had settled back towards the tail. They popped the left side slides and evac'd. The L1 slide was hanging straight down and no one noticed until pax started hitting the ground. Several went out that door and were injured. The L2 door was hanging down at a 70 degree angle. That's the one my CO went down, he got away with just bruised heels. The L3 and 4 were very shallow. This is something not mentioned in training, at least not at the major airline I worked for. Gotta use some common sense and evaluate the position of the jet.
https://www.upi.com/Archives/1987/07...4693553665600/
https://www.upi.com/Archives/1987/07...4693553665600/
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 353
Gotta be honest I’m not a UAL guy... but it blows my mind how easily people judge the actions and efforts of others. Chances are the “big cheese” in a 320 at UAL has decades of experience in both seats and probably in the Airbus... he or she made the best decision at the time given the information and set of circumstances in front of him (or her). Getting into a falice measuring contest on APC solves nothing and furthermore none of us will ever learn from it by having a conversation on here WITHOUT ANY FACTUAL INFORMATION. They don’t hand out 320 type ratings and UAL captains wings at Walmart...this was more than likely the best decision and that particular moment. Yes pilot error is the real deal and can snow ball into loss of hull or worse human lives. Statistically...emergencies in the good ole US of A have good outcomes... because of experience and high levels of training..EVERYONE walked away... the rest is poppycock...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post