Avianca
06-11-2019, 01:41 PM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
UAL's majority ownership of Avianca is a scope violation. And scope is about as serious as it gets.
As a bonus this happened during contract talks that are currently focused on the remaining items of pay, retirement and...scope.
This is gonna get interesting fast.
As a bonus this happened during contract talks that are currently focused on the remaining items of pay, retirement and...scope.
This is gonna get interesting fast.
Last edited by cadetdrivr; 06-11-2019 at 01:54 PM.
06-11-2019, 03:41 PM
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
It could be used as leverage but there is nothing I'm willing to ease scope for. So imho it's a moot point. These are two completely separate issues that should not influence each other.
06-11-2019, 03:50 PM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,808
You think the company is using a bad loan to leverage negotiating new CBA language - by blatantly violating current language? Yes, shrewd! 
Let’s see how that works out.
It appears that company was trying to salvage a bad loan which is understandable, but, the details are going to cost them. The Master Chairman has more than enough experience and a sterling track record in the grievance arena. I guess we’ll wait for a new CBA while the company learns about scope.
Let’s see how that works out. It appears that company was trying to salvage a bad loan which is understandable, but, the details are going to cost them. The Master Chairman has more than enough experience and a sterling track record in the grievance arena. I guess we’ll wait for a new CBA while the company learns about scope.
06-11-2019, 06:20 PM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
You think the company is using a bad loan to leverage negotiating new CBA language - by blatantly violating current language? Yes, shrewd! Let’s see how that works out.
It appears that company was trying to salvage a bad loan which is understandable, but, the details are going to cost them. The Master Chairman has more than enough experience and a sterling track record in the grievance arena. I guess we’ll wait for a new CBA while the company learns about scope.
Let’s see how that works out. It appears that company was trying to salvage a bad loan which is understandable, but, the details are going to cost them. The Master Chairman has more than enough experience and a sterling track record in the grievance arena. I guess we’ll wait for a new CBA while the company learns about scope.
Why the rush? It's not personal, just business.
06-11-2019, 06:31 PM
#8
Banned
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Posts: 1,182
How many posts
Interesting development....
So, how about a poll.
Chime in with how many posts are made on this subject before someone starts attacking another poster.
I’m guessing 11. (Poll replies don’t count)
So, how about a poll.
Chime in with how many posts are made on this subject before someone starts attacking another poster.
I’m guessing 11. (Poll replies don’t count)
06-11-2019, 06:59 PM
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Why attack. We might have differences of opinion but in the end most want the same thing in a better contract. Polls or fake Gardener letters aren't needed.
06-11-2019, 08:20 PM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,808
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
