Search

Notices

737 MAX grounded

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2019, 08:34 AM
  #101  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,407
Default

Originally Posted by JoePatroni
If the AOA sensor caused the problem, why would they want them now?
You cannot "opt out" of the AOA sensors on modern transport aircraft, they feed data to too many other functions. I doubt you could certify a jet without them.

Apparently you can get optional displays for the pilots. But either way, other systems still need AOA data.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 09:21 AM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Default

The article is another example of poorly researched and what some call "fake news." As many state ALL airliners have AOA sensors which feed data to the FDC for various functions including the stall warning.

An AOA gage or indicator could be used as a replacement for airspeed on approaches, but if the AOA sensor has failed it too provides failed data and, while I don't know what Boeing offers, I would bet the AOA indicator would yellow out with a failed indication.

Again the article is just hyperbole to sell ads and bring in readers with the latest gossip.
Regularguy is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 09:39 AM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,871
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
I think this is a media misunderstanding. My airplane has two AOA sensors that feed the ADCs. However we don’t have an AOA readout. It doesn’t mean United doesn’t have AOA sensors. They just elected not to have the AOA number in any display.
That makes more sense.
JoePatroni is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 10:15 AM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

The bad optics will remain. "Others elected to buy two safety features, United did not," is what this article says. After the intense scrutiny of this system I think it’s likely Boeing will supply them for free or the FAA will require them. If not, United will have to continue to answer the question of why they don’t have them and "we don’t need them" probably won’t work as time goes on.
APC225 is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 10:19 AM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: Co-Captain
Posts: 118
Default

Originally Posted by Regularguy
The article is another example of poorly researched and what some call "fake news." As many state ALL airliners have AOA sensors which feed data to the FDC for various functions including the stall warning.

An AOA gage or indicator could be used as a replacement for airspeed on approaches, but if the AOA sensor has failed it too provides failed data and, while I don't know what Boeing offers, I would bet the AOA indicator would yellow out with a failed indication.

Again the article is just hyperbole to sell ads and bring in readers with the latest gossip.
I don’t see where the article mentions these aircraft not having the AOA sensors. Just the additional information concerning what the sensors are telling the pilots.
1. AOA indicator
2. AOA disagree indication

The article also sheds light on the pervasiveness of “safety as a luxury” in aircraft engineering.
echoaviation is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 11:30 AM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flightmedic01's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Reclining
Posts: 840
Default

Originally Posted by Zenofzin
I get the point of the MCAS system, but wouldn’t it make sense for it to require DUAL channel inputs and disable it in the event of a single channel failure or disagreement as so many other systems are?? Seems like that might have prevented both accidents from occurring.
Common sense will not be tolerated. In fact, it will be punished!!
flightmedic01 is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 04:25 PM
  #107  
Pura Vida
 
HercAC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Jorge Alfa
Posts: 198
Default

United opted for a Sterile Light in lieu of the AOA indicator (small gage in the upper corner of the PFD) and HUD
HercAC is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 04:38 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SFO Guppy CA
Posts: 1,112
Default

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/20/boeing-drops-on-report-fbi-is-joining-criminal-investigation-into-certification-of-boeing-737-max.html?__source=facebook%7Cmain

Things could get interesting for Boeing???
DashTrash is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 07:12 PM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by DashTrash
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/20/boeing-drops-on-report-fbi-is-joining-criminal-investigation-into-certification-of-boeing-737-max.html?__source=facebook%7Cmain

Things could get interesting for Boeing???
It could get interesting for the FAA as well.
baseball is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 10:46 PM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Default

Originally Posted by echoaviation
I don’t see where the article mentions these aircraft not having the AOA sensors. Just the additional information concerning what the sensors are telling the pilots.
1. AOA indicator
2. AOA disagree indication

The article also sheds light on the pervasiveness of “safety as a luxury” in aircraft engineering.
I guess I didn’t make myself clear, my take on the article is these two items were being considered as possibly able to prevent the accidents. I’m calling BS, neither of these two items would have prevented the MCAS false input, they would not have alerted the crew of a failed AOA sensor any more than the loss of airspeed on the Captain’s PFD and neither would have alerted the crew to follow a procedure right after takeoff that wasn’t trained.

AOA indicators have been available for the entire time I been in this industry and, with a small exception, have not been purchased by the airlines.

In the case of a failed sensor the AOA indicators on a modern PFD would probably go yellow and indicate lack of data. Or it would have indicated a stall condition the MCAS responded to.

No matter what it is fake/hyperbolic reporting trying to find another answer to Boeing and the FAA’s joint failure in certification and training requirements.
Regularguy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CLazarus
United
810
04-04-2020 07:58 PM
n606tw
JetBlue
47
10-20-2019 10:29 AM
Sunvox
United
45
03-17-2017 06:56 AM
Raptor
FedEx
132
07-20-2016 06:08 PM
Kapitanleutnant
Foreign
0
04-11-2015 08:32 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices