Search

Notices

MEC Christmas Card

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2019, 07:04 AM
  #161  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,725
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
There are thousands of active and retired UAL pilots that have had an entirely different experience, even under the revised laws.
All it takes is another round of “shared sacrifice” and well planned bankruptcy and your new improved “bullet proof” A plan is gone.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 01-15-2019, 09:27 AM
  #162  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
All it takes is another round of “shared sacrifice” and well planned bankruptcy and your new improved “bullet proof” A plan is gone.
They don't even need to do that. Bristol-Myers Squibb announced last month that they're terminating their US pension plan. https://www.pionline.com/article/201...s-pension-plan

The only 'bulletproof' pension plan at this point is a 401k. Until some company figures out how to claw back fully vested contributions.
Andy is offline  
Old 01-15-2019, 09:31 AM
  #163  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Posts: 1,182
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
There are thousands of active and retired UAL pilots that have had an entirely different experience, even under the revised laws.
Are you implying that United management raided the pension funds, (as in removing money from the plan) without the approval or agreement of the pilots, and that this happened in the 21st century?
BMEP100 is offline  
Old 01-15-2019, 09:52 AM
  #164  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,860
Default

Originally Posted by BMEP100
It could do you a lot of good. All depends on how your service is credited, and back dating is allowed by IRS.

I know of Continental pilots that retired after about 10 years in their DB plan with a lump sum of over a million (in addition to 401k), in 2004. And that was calculated on obviuosly lower CAL wages. Although the plan started in ‘92, it credited their service back to their hire date of ‘85 with NYA, PEX, or CAL. You have to understand how DB plan benefits are calculated and service credited.

Backdating a DB plan to provide “make up or catch up” is a kind of outside box thinking you have missed.

Someone mentioned the company “rading” a DB plan... The laws have long such changed. Employers can’t do that anymore.

This is a retirement plan that does not rely on big profit sharing checks or your prowess as a stock market investor.

I have a frozen DB plan from CAL and, yes, the former formula was very good. I'm fairly certain the backdating thing came up one time during Contract '97 talks and I seem to remember there was some kind of tax reason that prevented it....I could be wrong. Also, hitting a seven figure lump sum payout after only ten years doesn't sound possible...I had about ten years in when it was frozen and mine wasn't even close to that.


I also agree the rules have changed making it much harder for a company to distress terminate a plan, AMR tried it and got shot down.

Last edited by JoePatroni; 01-15-2019 at 10:02 AM.
JoePatroni is offline  
Old 01-15-2019, 09:54 AM
  #165  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,860
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
They don't even need to do that. Bristol-Myers Squibb announced last month that they're terminating their US pension plan. https://www.pionline.com/article/201...s-pension-plan

The only 'bulletproof' pension plan at this point is a 401k. Until some company figures out how to claw back fully vested contributions.

That plan is currently frozen and I don't think anyone is losing any money by it being terminated.
JoePatroni is offline  
Old 01-15-2019, 10:06 AM
  #166  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by JoePatroni
That plan is currently frozen and I don't think anyone is losing any money by it being terminated.
So,
Step 1 - freeze new pension.
Step 2 - terminate pension and give them annuities.
I would expect those annuities to be far less than was 'forecast' given the current interest rate environment.
Andy is offline  
Old 01-15-2019, 10:11 AM
  #167  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,860
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
So,
Step 1 - freeze new pension.
Step 2 - terminate pension and give them annuities.
I would expect those annuities to be far less than was 'forecast' given the current interest rate environment.

I don't know if they're all the same or not but I don't think they can lessen the value of the end number on a frozen plan. A distressed one is a whole other ballgame. The interest rate is the wild card but until you retire no one knows what the actual number is, even our plan pre-freeze was predicated on the GATT rate. It wasn't uncommon for guys to pull the plug at the last minute, before the quarterly GATT rate move, to save money on their lump sum. This created a staffing nightmare at times because most of those guys were wide body captains.

I do know that the lump sum option can be suspended due to plan performance but it can also be reinstated down the road.
JoePatroni is offline  
Old 01-15-2019, 10:24 AM
  #168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cadetdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Default

Originally Posted by BMEP100
Are you implying that United management raided the pension funds, (as in removing money from the plan) without the approval or agreement of the pilots, and that this happened in the 21st century?
Implying? No.

The overfunded pilot persnion fund was quite legally raided to benefit UAL, management, and the creditors in several different ways during the bankruptcy. Freezing the plan would have been the obvious choice, but that would have prevented UAL from using the funds for other purposes, most notably making up for shortfalls in the other plans when it went to the PBGC. It was WIN-WIN-WIN for everybody involved except the pilots.

It doesn’t really matter if the pickpocket grabs your wallet from the left pocket or the right pocket if the wallet is still gone.
cadetdrivr is offline  
Old 01-15-2019, 10:29 AM
  #169  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Posts: 1,182
Default

Originally Posted by JoePatroni
I have a frozen DB plan from CAL and, yes, the former formula was very good. I'm fairly certain the backdating thing came up one time during Contract '97 talks and I seem to remember there was some kind of tax reason that prevented it....I could be wrong. Also, hitting a seven figure lump sum payout after only ten years doesn't sound possible...I had about ten years in when it was frozen and mine wasn't even close to that.
The frozen lump sum was determined by FAE and years of service when it was frozen pilots with 10 years as W/B captain at the freeze date got 7 figures when the GATT rates went down. They would have had 20 years service in the plan.
BMEP100 is offline  
Old 01-15-2019, 10:35 AM
  #170  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,860
Default

Originally Posted by BMEP100
The frozen lump sum was determined by FAE and years of service when it was frozen pilots with 10 years as W/B captain at the freeze date got 7 figures when the GATT rates went down. They would have had 20 years service in the plan.

It was an average of your five highest years of the last ten years times 2.2%, having twenty years absolutely put you into a seven figure lump sum. I think I misunderstood, I thought you were saying that after a person had ten years TOTAL in the plan they would hit seven figures
JoePatroni is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
alfaromeo
Major
68
06-29-2012 04:16 AM
Redeye Pilot
United
112
11-07-2010 01:31 PM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
0
09-24-2005 08:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices