Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
19-02 Out later today.  Crew Resources update >

19-02 Out later today. Crew Resources update

Search

Notices

19-02 Out later today. Crew Resources update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2018, 04:36 AM
  #161  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cal73's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 737 Captain
Posts: 875
Default

Approximately how senior does one need to be to not end up in the sim every ~3 months? Just curious. Considering the jump. Thanks gents
cal73 is offline  
Old 10-01-2018, 04:48 AM
  #162  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
Agree, it’s those that bid it then complain, as referenced in this thread.
A couple of posts on a public forum do not make it an issue unless it's a company determined to give it to you on the chen.
Floyd is offline  
Old 10-01-2018, 04:53 AM
  #163  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by cal73
Approximately how senior does one need to be to not end up in the sim every ~3 months? Just curious. Considering the jump. Thanks gents
Depends upon the domicile in regards to the staffing levels. I'd say below 70% you're rolling the dice. If one could pull $224/ and increase his or her quality of life, going to TK every three months for landings class is a small price to pay. Sign me up.
Floyd is offline  
Old 10-01-2018, 05:06 AM
  #164  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: B777 FO
Posts: 240
Default

Originally Posted by cal73
Approximately how senior does one need to be to not end up in the sim every ~3 months? Just curious. Considering the jump. Thanks gents
I am in the bottom third in my Base and I get one or two flying trips a month. Sometimes with pbs but mostly with trading.
catIIIc is offline  
Old 10-01-2018, 05:26 AM
  #165  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,871
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
Agree, it’s those that bid it then complain, as referenced in this thread.

The same guys who want to go to PVG instead of SFO or ORD and then beg for landings.
JoePatroni is offline  
Old 10-01-2018, 07:59 AM
  #166  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cal73's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 737 Captain
Posts: 875
Default

Thanks Gents! Appreciate the replies
cal73 is offline  
Old 10-01-2018, 08:24 AM
  #167  
Pilot Response
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 479
Default

As was said above. It's a choice you can (usually) make between lower quality flying seats or higher quality bunkie seats.



Cheers
NFLUALNFL is offline  
Old 10-01-2018, 09:06 AM
  #168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,265
Default

Originally Posted by Floyd
A couple of posts on a public forum do not make it an issue unless it's a company determined to give it to you on the chen.
Those were the ones I was talking to.
Grumble is offline  
Old 10-01-2018, 12:54 PM
  #169  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 15
Default

I've been on the triple as a junior line holder for a little over a year and haven't had to go to landings class. (SFO) I generally get a couple of landings a month without too much effort.
UAL seasoned is offline  
Old 10-01-2018, 03:59 PM
  #170  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,173
Default

When I got hired, the 747-100 had pure bunkies. They were not current, could not take off or land. They were only qualified to sit in the seat at cruise.

It was an interesting situation. That was in the era of the original B-scale. But IRO was mainline pay--quite a bit below 747 F/O pay. Dick Ferris never thought that new hires under the B-scale could hold IRO so he never negotiated a B-scale for the IRO. Until several of us got the bid. Then he tried to retroactively impose a B-scale to IRO. Plain, clear, and simple in the contract, one non-b-scale pay, and it was grieved and won.

I got a big check after the grievance was won. But, the moral of the story is, yes if we had a pure IRO, it would pay less than F/O. Not because the union would want it, but management would insist. Be carful what you wish for.

The current system of bunkies is fairly well entrenched. I don't see it changing.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bluedriver
JetBlue
51
09-04-2017 10:45 AM
Days Off
FedEx
56
10-19-2015 09:06 AM
DMEarc
Regional
1249
12-17-2010 11:37 PM
forgot to bid
Hangar Talk
5
07-25-2010 04:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices