Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
19-02 Out later today.  Crew Resources update >

19-02 Out later today. Crew Resources update

Search

Notices

19-02 Out later today. Crew Resources update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-2018, 07:22 PM
  #121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 859
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
There are good IROs that stay engaged and can still function in the right seat when called upon and there are completely checked out IROs who are professional backseaters. those dudes are scary but that’s why there is 2 of us upfront.

It’s not that hard to stay engaged in 2.5 years on the 787 I only had the flying seat 6 times after IOE my longest stretch was 10 months without being in the flying seat. I feel like I always do a good job when I’m in the seat never the less.
10 MONTHS. Dang. I feel slow now doing 1-3 legs in el autobús when compared to flying a turboprop but 10 months. Ee Gad. (Obvi, nuthin bout u juz crayyy cuz)
ReadyRsv is offline  
Old 09-29-2018, 07:50 PM
  #122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
Default

Originally Posted by ReadyRsv
10 MONTHS. Dang. I feel slow now doing 1-3 legs in el autobús when compared to flying a turboprop but 10 months. Ee Gad. (Obvi, nuthin bout u juz crayyy cuz)
Yeah that sucked I love flying.
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 09-29-2018, 08:00 PM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
robthree's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 777, sofa
Posts: 1,183
Default

Interesting discussion of IRO competency as flying pilot. At my previous carrier we flew as a four-pilot crew and cycled the IROs through the flying seat regularly. The Captain generally made every fourth landing, instead of every other landing.

How would you WB guys feel about removing the flying/bunkie distinction from the FO lines and just have the guy who had the most recent landing do the walk around and the maps and let the other guy fly? Yes, this would be another area where seniority would be circumvented, but in the name of improving safety by raising the overall competence on the flight deck.
robthree is offline  
Old 09-29-2018, 08:56 PM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 456
Default

Originally Posted by robthree
Interesting discussion of IRO competency as flying pilot. At my previous carrier we flew as a four-pilot crew and cycled the IROs through the flying seat regularly. The Captain generally made every fourth landing, instead of every other landing.

How would you WB guys feel about removing the flying/bunkie distinction from the FO lines and just have the guy who had the most recent landing do the walk around and the maps and let the other guy fly? Yes, this would be another area where seniority would be circumvented, but in the name of improving safety by raising the overall competence on the flight deck.
I think we’re unique in this matter. Don’t really understand why we have a bunkie position in a bid other than “that’s the way we’ve always done it.”
Galaxy5 is offline  
Old 09-29-2018, 09:09 PM
  #125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 459
Default

The record for longest stretch without actually flying the plane that I've had someone tell me first hand (happened to him, not a "so and so" did) was 5.5 years. That's quite a stretch.


I never bid IRO or FO positions. I just bid days off I needed and efficiency. Sometimes I'd be the FO, other times the IRO. I still like flying so I would always try to switch to the FO position if I could, but I'd never downbid or trade down to fly. If I have a 29hr trip, I'm not bidding down to a 23hr or less trip just to get a landing. That's the equivalent to renting the plane IMO.


After 7+ years, I got bored with not flying much, even as the FO, so I went to the bus. I'm getting plenty of opportunity to fly now..
Spicy McHaggis is offline  
Old 09-29-2018, 09:10 PM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: B756 FO
Posts: 1,288
Default

Originally Posted by Galaxy5
I think we’re unique in this matter. Don’t really understand why we have a bunkie position in a bid other than “that’s the way we’ve always done it.”
I understand that when I see I’m the bunkie I know I’ll be on first rest and avoid the coffee or wake up a bit earlier in the day. If I’m the flying pilot I can prepare for the flight by sleeping in later or grabbing a short nap before report time. It would really suck showing up to an 11 hour flight/
3 man crew or one of the late night 4 man crew ULH flights and not having any clue who is taking first rest.
SUX4U is offline  
Old 09-29-2018, 09:46 PM
  #127  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

I flew long haul long ago (777 FO) and just bid back to it again. I never flew the 2 or 3 trip a month gig, as I wasn't senior enough. I am now.

I always felt that somebody on the jet needs to know how to fly. I think the captain should get every other landing. I always liked the idea of "professional IRO's", as I would rather have 2 pilots on the jet that still know how to fly. Trying keep 4 pilots current with 4-6 landings a month just doesn't seem doable to me.

Just my opinion.
Probe is offline  
Old 09-30-2018, 05:33 AM
  #128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Big E 757's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: A320 Left seat
Posts: 2,594
Default

Originally Posted by SUX4U
I understand that when I see I’m the bunkie I know I’ll be on first rest and avoid the coffee or wake up a bit earlier in the day. If I’m the flying pilot I can prepare for the flight by sleeping in later or grabbing a short nap before report time. It would really suck showing up to an 11 hour flight/
3 man crew or one of the late night 4 man crew ULH flights and not having any clue who is taking first rest.
This is the problem with not having a designated “bunkie” on augmented crew flight. I’m at Delta and flew the 757/767 (7ER) as an FO for 8 years. The first three years I did nothing but JFK to Europe and every trip, I didn’t know what break I’d be on until the briefing. I’d always try to commute in early enough to take a nap and if I did get one, I wouldn’t always be able to sleep on first break, but at least I started out rested. Most of our flights to Western Europe weren’t long enough to really get tired out of JFK but the late flight to LHR and Budapest, Bucharest, Istanbul, Kiev were long enough to make it hard to stay awake towards the end of the flight. It would have been nice to know before hand, what break I was going to be on.

The Captain would usually ask who needed the landing and that FO was the relief on the way over (the Captain almost always flew over) and then be the flying pilot on the way back.
Big E 757 is offline  
Old 09-30-2018, 07:17 AM
  #129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Default

While it's always the Captain's call to determine who flies the leg, that authority should only be exercised under the rarest of circumstances. Removing the bunky as a bid position and allowing the Captain to determine which First Officer flies is an abrogation of seniority. For those who suggested a professional bunky position that is nothing more than a C scale and greatly reduces widebody opportunities, read $$$, for hundreds and maybe north of a thousand First Officers.
Floyd is offline  
Old 09-30-2018, 08:06 AM
  #130  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,265
Default

Originally Posted by Big E 757
This is the problem with not having a designated “bunkie” on augmented crew flight. I’m at Delta and flew the 757/767 (7ER) as an FO for 8 years. The first three years I did nothing but JFK to Europe and every trip, I didn’t know what break I’d be on until the briefing. I’d always try to commute in early enough to take a nap and if I did get one, I wouldn’t always be able to sleep on first break, but at least I started out rested. Most of our flights to Western Europe weren’t long enough to really get tired out of JFK but the late flight to LHR and Budapest, Bucharest, Istanbul, Kiev were long enough to make it hard to stay awake towards the end of the flight. It would have been nice to know before hand, what break I was going to be on.

The Captain would usually ask who needed the landing and that FO was the relief on the way over (the Captain almost always flew over) and then be the flying pilot on the way back.
This is exactly why we need to have the IRO its own bid. If you don’t want to play the bunkie/landings class game... don’t f’ing bid it.
Grumble is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bluedriver
JetBlue
51
09-04-2017 10:45 AM
Days Off
FedEx
56
10-19-2015 09:06 AM
DMEarc
Regional
1249
12-17-2010 11:37 PM
forgot to bid
Hangar Talk
5
07-25-2010 04:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices