Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United Orders 4 Boeing 787-9's and 25 EMB-175 >

United Orders 4 Boeing 787-9's and 25 EMB-175

Search

Notices

United Orders 4 Boeing 787-9's and 25 EMB-175

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-2018, 02:06 PM
  #151  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr
Translation; "I, CALFO am completely clueless of how regional CBA negotiations operate"
You seem incapable of arguing a position. You do realize that when pilots are in high demeand it equates to leverage? You do realize that management wants the shiny new planes just as much as pilots? Is it enough leverage to push regional rates to the realm of the majors? Not yet. But it’s definitely a step in the right direction.
CALFO is offline  
Old 07-18-2018, 02:35 PM
  #152  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: Boeing 737 FO
Posts: 125
Default

Are UAL pilots willing to fly RJ’s at 9E rates for the moment? Then work on increasing those rates with subsequent contract cycles?
animation is offline  
Old 07-18-2018, 03:11 PM
  #153  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,754
Default

Originally Posted by CALFO
You seem incapable of arguing a position. You do realize that when pilots are in high demeand it equates to leverage? You do realize that management wants the shiny new planes just as much as pilots? Is it enough leverage to push regional rates to the realm of the majors? Not yet. But it’s definitely a step in the right direction.
You seem completely incapable of understanding the issues regional MEC NC's have getting better CBA's.

Doesn't matter if it's the WO's or the UAX's.

But sure, I'll play your little game;

Pilots at Endeavor/Enovy/PSA etc tell management "we want all the signing and retention bonuses converted to hard pay rates and overall compensation/401K, etc. You know, because we have leverage"

Sure, when they (management) stop laughing at the pilots they'll say "ok, we passed it up to mother DAL/AAG, and they laughed too. They're just fine handing out the cash, because when the next downturn comes they'll be less economically nimble or able to control their sourcing costs."

UAX? that's a whole different level of Alpha Fox Uniform'd.
John Carr is offline  
Old 07-18-2018, 04:13 PM
  #154  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr
You seem completely incapable of understanding the issues regional MEC NC's have getting better CBA's.

Doesn't matter if it's the WO's or the UAX's.

But sure, I'll play your little game;

Pilots at Endeavor/Enovy/PSA etc tell management "we want all the signing and retention bonuses converted to hard pay rates and overall compensation/401K, etc. You know, because we have leverage"

Sure, when they (management) stop laughing at the pilots they'll say "ok, we passed it up to mother DAL/AAG, and they laughed too. They're just fine handing out the cash, because when the next downturn comes they'll be less economically nimble or able to control their sourcing costs."

UAX? that's a whole different level of Alpha Fox Uniform'd.
So management will say no to your proposal because it costs money? Why did this hypothetical union enter into Section 6 negotiations if they don’t plan on leveraging what they can to make gains?.

Also, don’t open your negotiations by conceding one item (bonuses) for another (pay rates). This makes you look like you don’t know what you are doing. Perhaps ask for both.

Oh, and be sure to ask for more than just pay rates. Things like work rules.

Honestly, I don’t keep too current on regional section 6 negotiations, but I do believe that both republic and endeavor have made significant gains in the current environment.
CALFO is offline  
Old 07-18-2018, 05:10 PM
  #155  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by animation
Are UAL pilots willing to fly RJ’s at 9E rates for the moment? Then work on increasing those rates with subsequent contract cycles?
United has a simple choice. If they want more large RJ's then they have to add a SNB fleet. Until then they are scope choking(read leverage). Not to be confused with choking the golden goose which will be revisited in a year or so.

Right now they are sitting on a 50+ seat gap and are short domestic capacity. They can pay us now or pay us later. I'm content to wait for however long it takes.
Floyd is offline  
Old 07-18-2018, 05:14 PM
  #156  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
6 months ago DL about 175s with 70 seats Skywest will be flying them. It’s a think man not just a Kirby thing in fact it is called the 175SC.
And it's made to get past scope. I'm sure Delta would love to get scope relief as well. In fact, there was already a news article going on about how it wouldn't really cost pilots anything since the jobs and planes are already at the regional, so why not just give them the seats for a small pay increase. There's a thread on the Delta subforum about it.

Originally Posted by Bluewaffle
Nobody is saying it’s the regional pilots fault. We’re fighting to fix the mistakes of the past and hopefully get out of the Sh*t Sandwich regional model that still exists. Scope isn’t even up for discussion unless it’s an improvement from our current agreement. You want to be part of the solution? Stop working for the regionals! Go to an LCC or ULCC, get a new type and move on.
You're so out of touch I don't even know where to start.
Baradium is offline  
Old 07-18-2018, 05:14 PM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by Boeing Aviator
I fully realize there is no shortage of qualified pilots for the Legacies today, but in 3 to 5 years there will be. I’ve read articles that the head of SWA pilot hiring number one worry is who they are going to hire in the future with impending pilot shortage beyond the Regionals.

Now Delta asks non pilot employees to take leaves of absences to train to become pilots.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/07/16/help-wanted-delta-seeks-8000-pilots-flight-attendants-may-apply.html
They're not "asking" employees to take leaves. They are offering employees an opportunity.
Baradium is offline  
Old 07-18-2018, 09:13 PM
  #158  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 845
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium
And it's made to get past scope. I'm sure Delta would love to get scope relief as well. In fact, there was already a news article going on about how it wouldn't really cost pilots anything since the jobs and planes are already at the regional, so why not just give them the seats for a small pay increase. There's a thread on the Delta subforum about it.



You're so out of touch I don't even know where to start.
How is the 175SC made to get past scope? It fully complies with the scope clauses of today.
Tpinks is offline  
Old 07-18-2018, 11:14 PM
  #159  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium
And it's made to get past scope. I'm sure Delta would love to get scope relief as well. In fact, there was already a news article going on about how it wouldn't really cost pilots anything since the jobs and planes are already at the regional, so why not just give them the seats for a small pay increase. There's a thread on the Delta subforum about it.



You're so out of touch I don't even know where to start.
Our contract limits UAL to 105 x 70 seat RJs and 156 x 76 seat RJs. They can buy an E-190 and send it to Mesa as long as it’s under the MGTOW scope limit and fewer than 70 seats. Scope choke is working and your postulation that scope relief for money wouldn’t cost us anything is naive at best and completely moronic at worst.
Grumble is offline  
Old 07-19-2018, 03:43 AM
  #160  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cal73's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 737 Captain
Posts: 872
Default

2000’s era AMR connection operated an Emb-145 variant (E-140 I think) that had 44 seats. It was ordered to fit into the APA scope clause of the time. iirc.
cal73 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices