Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United Orders 4 Boeing 787-9's and 25 EMB-175 >

United Orders 4 Boeing 787-9's and 25 EMB-175

Search

Notices

United Orders 4 Boeing 787-9's and 25 EMB-175

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-2018, 11:04 AM
  #111  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 77
Default

Originally Posted by ItnStln
Who owns 30% of MESA?


Correction 20%

5,029,052 shares of common stock

American Airlines, Inc. 1,000,000
Texxx is offline  
Old 07-17-2018, 11:04 AM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
Default

Originally Posted by ItnStln
Which regional is non-union?
Skywest the biggest one
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 07-17-2018, 11:55 AM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DG1000's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: DCA756FO
Posts: 210
Default

Originally Posted by CALFO
There is absolutely no reason that a UAL pilot on a UAL owned aircraft on a UAL route should sit behind a pilot for a regional that is not serving the route.
I’m guessing; you have never worked at a regional have you?
DG1000 is offline  
Old 07-17-2018, 12:05 PM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Default

Originally Posted by DG1000
I’m guessing; you have never worked at a regional have you?
My background is completely irrelevant to my point. Let me flip this on its head and see what you think:

Jetblue is flying the heck out of jfk-mco. They can’t get more airplanes so they contract United to provide extra lift. It’s a purchase-capacity agreement so JetBlue complete controls the route. One day a JetBlue pilot is trying to get home to Orlando ( a commute she’s made for years on jetblue). She arrives at the gate an hour early only to find a Skywest pilot already at the counter. Are you telling me that she shouldn’t have an advantage over the Skywest pilot for the jumpseat?
CALFO is offline  
Old 07-17-2018, 12:30 PM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: 145
Posts: 219
Default

I do hope i'm wrong about scope relief. I'm just very skeptical of all the talk of holding the line on scope.

I do have a lot to gain by you pulling the flying back in house. Do not confuse my skepticism for not wanting to see it happen. My belief is that United and others would like to find a way to ride out this shortage as long as they can. I'm sure they're trying to find ways to keep the old regional model alive. Possibly we're at or close to the point, where they can no longer beat a dead horse. I sure hope so, but I won't get too excited until I see it happen.

Last edited by Celeste; 07-17-2018 at 12:47 PM.
Celeste is offline  
Old 07-17-2018, 12:32 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
Default

Originally Posted by CALFO
My background is completely irrelevant to my point. Let me flip this on its head and see what you think:

Jetblue is flying the heck out of jfk-mco. They can’t get more airplanes so they contract United to provide extra lift. It’s a purchase-capacity agreement so JetBlue complete controls the route. One day a JetBlue pilot is trying to get home to Orlando ( a commute she’s made for years on jetblue). She arrives at the gate an hour early only to find a Skywest pilot already at the counter. Are you telling me that she shouldn’t have an advantage over the Skywest pilot for the jumpseat?
JetBlue doesn’t own the airplane. Nor does Skywest.
Grumble is offline  
Old 07-17-2018, 12:34 PM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: 145
Posts: 219
Default

Originally Posted by Bluewaffle
Nobody is saying it’s the regional pilots fault. We’re fighting to fix the mistakes of the past and hopefully get out of the Sh*t Sandwich regional model that still exists. Scope isn’t even up for discussion unless it’s an improvement from our current agreement. You want to be part of the solution? Stop working for the regionals! Go to an LCC or ULCC, get a new type and move on.
I'm not sure going to an LCC and getting paid less than a regional FO (in some cases $20,000+ less)
to fly an A321 is really part of the solution, either....
Celeste is offline  
Old 07-17-2018, 12:45 PM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DG1000's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: DCA756FO
Posts: 210
Default

Originally Posted by CALFO
My background is completely irrelevant to my point. Let me flip this on its head and see what you think:

Jetblue is flying the heck out of jfk-mco. They can’t get more airplanes so they contract United to provide extra lift. It’s a purchase-capacity agreement so JetBlue complete controls the route. One day a JetBlue pilot is trying to get home to Orlando ( a commute she’s made for years on jetblue). She arrives at the gate an hour early only to find a Skywest pilot already at the counter. Are you telling me that she shouldn’t have an advantage over the Skywest pilot for the jumpseat?
So that’s a no to my question...

To answer your flip; your proposition is untenable. Myriad of reasons why it’s not including being competitors, scope clauses, etc. We aren’t playing “what if” here. Try and use a real world scenario please?

I am just not on your side thinking mainline should have priority over a regional on that regionals own route. Those aren’t mainline flight numbers. They’re flying those routes under their own certificate. Those pilots deserve every bit of a chance to fight to commute to work just the same as mainliners do. Equal misery for all.

You have a right to your opinion but the JS wish you have I believe would start a jumpseat war where everyone loses.
DG1000 is offline  
Old 07-17-2018, 12:57 PM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 845
Default

Originally Posted by CALFO
My background is completely irrelevant to my point. Let me flip this on its head and see what you think:

Jetblue is flying the heck out of jfk-mco. They can’t get more airplanes so they contract United to provide extra lift. It’s a purchase-capacity agreement so JetBlue complete controls the route. One day a JetBlue pilot is trying to get home to Orlando ( a commute she’s made for years on jetblue). She arrives at the gate an hour early only to find a Skywest pilot already at the counter. Are you telling me that she shouldn’t have an advantage over the Skywest pilot for the jumpseat?
Are you claiming that if you show up to a United Express flight and a Spirit Airlines pilot checks in before you that the Spirit pilot will get the seat over a United Pilot? Because that is what your analogy above is. If that is the case, do you even know what your jumpseat agreement between your Airline and it's regional partners is? Because as a UAX pilot, we take united people first over OAL AFTER our own pilots.

It's simple, the operating Airline (group) gets first priority over the seat. If you want the highest priority on it, then demand your company to take back the flying. Try spending your negotiating capital on that clause and see how it goes. I bet it won't go far.

And if you think for one second that you will get highest priority on the jumpseat of an aircraft operated by another airline, guess again. United Flight attendants tried to do that and guess what, the FA jumpseat is no longer available for anyone now. It's sad, but I don't feel bad when we have to leave someone behind with an open jumpseat all because that group was trying to be too greedy.
Tpinks is offline  
Old 07-17-2018, 12:59 PM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
Default

Originally Posted by DG1000
So that’s a no to my question...

To answer your flip; your proposition is untenable. Myriad of reasons why it’s not including being competitors, scope clauses, etc. We aren’t playing “what if” here. Try and use a real world scenario please?

I am just not on your side thinking mainline should have priority over a regional on that regionals own route. Those aren’t mainline flight numbers. They’re flying those routes under their own certificate. Those pilots deserve every bit of a chance to fight to commute to work just the same as mainliners do. Equal misery for all.

You have a right to your opinion but the JS wish you have I believe would start a jumpseat war where everyone loses.
Who sold the ticket? Whose passengers are they in the back? Whose paint job is on the airplane, logo on the ticket, jet ways, ticket counter, napkins, etc etc etc.
Grumble is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices