United Orders 4 Boeing 787-9's and 25 EMB-175
#113
#114
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
My background is completely irrelevant to my point. Let me flip this on its head and see what you think:
Jetblue is flying the heck out of jfk-mco. They can’t get more airplanes so they contract United to provide extra lift. It’s a purchase-capacity agreement so JetBlue complete controls the route. One day a JetBlue pilot is trying to get home to Orlando ( a commute she’s made for years on jetblue). She arrives at the gate an hour early only to find a Skywest pilot already at the counter. Are you telling me that she shouldn’t have an advantage over the Skywest pilot for the jumpseat?
Jetblue is flying the heck out of jfk-mco. They can’t get more airplanes so they contract United to provide extra lift. It’s a purchase-capacity agreement so JetBlue complete controls the route. One day a JetBlue pilot is trying to get home to Orlando ( a commute she’s made for years on jetblue). She arrives at the gate an hour early only to find a Skywest pilot already at the counter. Are you telling me that she shouldn’t have an advantage over the Skywest pilot for the jumpseat?
#115
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: 145
Posts: 219
I do hope i'm wrong about scope relief. I'm just very skeptical of all the talk of holding the line on scope.
I do have a lot to gain by you pulling the flying back in house. Do not confuse my skepticism for not wanting to see it happen. My belief is that United and others would like to find a way to ride out this shortage as long as they can. I'm sure they're trying to find ways to keep the old regional model alive. Possibly we're at or close to the point, where they can no longer beat a dead horse. I sure hope so, but I won't get too excited until I see it happen.
I do have a lot to gain by you pulling the flying back in house. Do not confuse my skepticism for not wanting to see it happen. My belief is that United and others would like to find a way to ride out this shortage as long as they can. I'm sure they're trying to find ways to keep the old regional model alive. Possibly we're at or close to the point, where they can no longer beat a dead horse. I sure hope so, but I won't get too excited until I see it happen.
Last edited by Celeste; 07-17-2018 at 12:47 PM.
#116
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
My background is completely irrelevant to my point. Let me flip this on its head and see what you think:
Jetblue is flying the heck out of jfk-mco. They can’t get more airplanes so they contract United to provide extra lift. It’s a purchase-capacity agreement so JetBlue complete controls the route. One day a JetBlue pilot is trying to get home to Orlando ( a commute she’s made for years on jetblue). She arrives at the gate an hour early only to find a Skywest pilot already at the counter. Are you telling me that she shouldn’t have an advantage over the Skywest pilot for the jumpseat?
Jetblue is flying the heck out of jfk-mco. They can’t get more airplanes so they contract United to provide extra lift. It’s a purchase-capacity agreement so JetBlue complete controls the route. One day a JetBlue pilot is trying to get home to Orlando ( a commute she’s made for years on jetblue). She arrives at the gate an hour early only to find a Skywest pilot already at the counter. Are you telling me that she shouldn’t have an advantage over the Skywest pilot for the jumpseat?
#117
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: 145
Posts: 219
Nobody is saying it’s the regional pilots fault. We’re fighting to fix the mistakes of the past and hopefully get out of the Sh*t Sandwich regional model that still exists. Scope isn’t even up for discussion unless it’s an improvement from our current agreement. You want to be part of the solution? Stop working for the regionals! Go to an LCC or ULCC, get a new type and move on.
to fly an A321 is really part of the solution, either....
#118
My background is completely irrelevant to my point. Let me flip this on its head and see what you think:
Jetblue is flying the heck out of jfk-mco. They can’t get more airplanes so they contract United to provide extra lift. It’s a purchase-capacity agreement so JetBlue complete controls the route. One day a JetBlue pilot is trying to get home to Orlando ( a commute she’s made for years on jetblue). She arrives at the gate an hour early only to find a Skywest pilot already at the counter. Are you telling me that she shouldn’t have an advantage over the Skywest pilot for the jumpseat?
Jetblue is flying the heck out of jfk-mco. They can’t get more airplanes so they contract United to provide extra lift. It’s a purchase-capacity agreement so JetBlue complete controls the route. One day a JetBlue pilot is trying to get home to Orlando ( a commute she’s made for years on jetblue). She arrives at the gate an hour early only to find a Skywest pilot already at the counter. Are you telling me that she shouldn’t have an advantage over the Skywest pilot for the jumpseat?
To answer your flip; your proposition is untenable. Myriad of reasons why it’s not including being competitors, scope clauses, etc. We aren’t playing “what if” here. Try and use a real world scenario please?
I am just not on your side thinking mainline should have priority over a regional on that regionals own route. Those aren’t mainline flight numbers. They’re flying those routes under their own certificate. Those pilots deserve every bit of a chance to fight to commute to work just the same as mainliners do. Equal misery for all.
You have a right to your opinion but the JS wish you have I believe would start a jumpseat war where everyone loses.
#119
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 845
My background is completely irrelevant to my point. Let me flip this on its head and see what you think:
Jetblue is flying the heck out of jfk-mco. They can’t get more airplanes so they contract United to provide extra lift. It’s a purchase-capacity agreement so JetBlue complete controls the route. One day a JetBlue pilot is trying to get home to Orlando ( a commute she’s made for years on jetblue). She arrives at the gate an hour early only to find a Skywest pilot already at the counter. Are you telling me that she shouldn’t have an advantage over the Skywest pilot for the jumpseat?
Jetblue is flying the heck out of jfk-mco. They can’t get more airplanes so they contract United to provide extra lift. It’s a purchase-capacity agreement so JetBlue complete controls the route. One day a JetBlue pilot is trying to get home to Orlando ( a commute she’s made for years on jetblue). She arrives at the gate an hour early only to find a Skywest pilot already at the counter. Are you telling me that she shouldn’t have an advantage over the Skywest pilot for the jumpseat?
It's simple, the operating Airline (group) gets first priority over the seat. If you want the highest priority on it, then demand your company to take back the flying. Try spending your negotiating capital on that clause and see how it goes. I bet it won't go far.
And if you think for one second that you will get highest priority on the jumpseat of an aircraft operated by another airline, guess again. United Flight attendants tried to do that and guess what, the FA jumpseat is no longer available for anyone now. It's sad, but I don't feel bad when we have to leave someone behind with an open jumpseat all because that group was trying to be too greedy.
#120
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
So that’s a no to my question...
To answer your flip; your proposition is untenable. Myriad of reasons why it’s not including being competitors, scope clauses, etc. We aren’t playing “what if” here. Try and use a real world scenario please?
I am just not on your side thinking mainline should have priority over a regional on that regionals own route. Those aren’t mainline flight numbers. They’re flying those routes under their own certificate. Those pilots deserve every bit of a chance to fight to commute to work just the same as mainliners do. Equal misery for all.
You have a right to your opinion but the JS wish you have I believe would start a jumpseat war where everyone loses.
To answer your flip; your proposition is untenable. Myriad of reasons why it’s not including being competitors, scope clauses, etc. We aren’t playing “what if” here. Try and use a real world scenario please?
I am just not on your side thinking mainline should have priority over a regional on that regionals own route. Those aren’t mainline flight numbers. They’re flying those routes under their own certificate. Those pilots deserve every bit of a chance to fight to commute to work just the same as mainliners do. Equal misery for all.
You have a right to your opinion but the JS wish you have I believe would start a jumpseat war where everyone loses.