Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Line pilots to be "pretend" students for TK >

Line pilots to be "pretend" students for TK

Search

Notices

Line pilots to be "pretend" students for TK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-2018, 04:47 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 169
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
That was never the point me or anyone was making. New hires can’t go to the 787 and 777 strictly because of seniority. There are 1500 pilots that have never had a chance to bid a WB yet.
^^^^This^^^^

I was a new hire into the 777 at CO in 2007. They had unfilled vacancies. They overtrained on the airplane because they were so worried about us, but woefully undertrained ya on intl ops and ETOPS where we actually needed instruction.

It turned out fine; 777 is a hell of a lot easier to fly than a 737 in my opinion.

So it could happen, but not while anyone in property is bidding for WB vacancies.
Deafguppy is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 12:12 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by davessn763
Why not? I can’t think of one good reason why a new hire can’t be trained for those airplanes.
MOP just phrased his post poorly. As has been clarified, the 777 and 787 haven't gone junior enough (no unfilled bids) for a new hire to get one of those aircraft.

As per our contract, in order for a newhire to get a BES, there has to be an unfilled vacancy. I'm not going to look back on each bid, but the bulk of unfilled bids have been 737 and A320, with some 756 vacancies that have gone unfilled.

Yes, LCAL had some 777 vacancies for newhires but LUAL has, to my knowledge, never had a newhire go to the 777. At least in the last 16 years.

So they need to do pretend students for those fleets (777 and 787), as a minimum.

I won't be one of the pilots who will take advantage of this opportunity, but I'm glad that some junior reserve pukes will be able to get 90 hours just for playing student. And I'm glad that they're spooling up the number of PIs at TK - hopefully to get ready for a lot of training requirements.
Andy is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 01:23 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,726
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
MOP just phrased his post poorly. As has been clarified, the 777 and 787 haven't gone junior enough (no unfilled bids) for a new hire to get one of those aircraft.

As per our contract, in order for a newhire to get a BES, there has to be an unfilled vacancy. I'm not going to look back on each bid, but the bulk of unfilled bids have been 737 and A320, with some 756 vacancies that have gone unfilled.

Yes, LCAL had some 777 vacancies for newhires but LUAL has, to my knowledge, never had a newhire go to the 777. At least in the last 16 years.

So they need to do pretend students for those fleets (777 and 787), as a minimum.

I won't be one of the pilots who will take advantage of this opportunity, but I'm glad that some junior reserve pukes will be able to get 90 hours just for playing student. And I'm glad that they're spooling up the number of PIs at TK - hopefully to get ready for a lot of training requirements.
I am not 100% sure that LUAL never had newhire go to the 777 or the 400. But they sure as heck have had some almost new hires hit those fleets in the past.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 01:57 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
I am not 100% sure that LUAL never had newhire go to the 777 or the 400. But they sure as heck have had some almost new hires hit those fleets in the past.
United also hired Tracy Aces. A long time ago.

Can you give any examples of probationary pilots hired in the last 16 years to the 777 or 400? I'm trying to limit this to people who did not watch a live baseball game where Babe Ruth was a player.
Andy is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 03:38 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dmeg13021's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 742
Default

So I suppose the DEN g-lines will jump up 10% tomorrow due to all the junior guys filling sim seats instead of sitting reserve as well? I don’t particularly want to drive to TK 18 times next month though. Unintended consequences of not utilizing line pilots for the, uh, line....
dmeg13021 is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 04:13 PM
  #36  
Get me outta here...
 
HuggyU2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Boeing right seat
Posts: 1,541
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
Can you give any examples of probationary pilots hired in the last 16 years to the 777 or 400?
How about 18 years?

I know 2 guys that were hired in 2000 and went to 727 engineer training. The day they finished 727 school, they put 747 F/O bids into the system, and were awarded them a few days later. I believe they had been with United less than 3 months.
HuggyU2 is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 04:24 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 153
Default

Seat locks were much different back then too. Had under 3 year Captains.

Chairman
CHAIRMAN is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 07:39 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,726
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
United also hired Tracy Aces. A long time ago.

Can you give any examples of probationary pilots hired in the last 16 years to the 777 or 400? I'm trying to limit this to people who did not watch a live baseball game where Babe Ruth was a player.
Well of course not since 2002, because this little thing called 9/11 and then bankruptcy happened. But in the late 90’s there sure as heck were proby guys going to the right seat of the 400 and 777. In 2000 I was a line holding F/0 on the 777 with three years seniority.

Now knock it off with the geezer jokes or I’m going to spit my dentures at you and smack you upside the head with my rotary phone.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 08:04 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 756 left
Posts: 771
Default

Originally Posted by Zoomie

It also mentions the company will give preferential treatment based on where pilots are based, which we assume will either be from TK or from bases that have excess staffing. Wouldn't seniority be the gold standard for something like this?
I think these types of assignments should belong to folks at TK and this is a trial balloon and also a way to get around paying PI's overtime. Just about all of the items from the company's opener was manpower negative. Many of the those items in the opener are TK manpower negative. Something stinks about this.

It doesn't seem like the management at TK would make the decision to do this. This idea had to come from Labor Relations in Chicago. I won't be surprised to see a grievance on this and I would personally stay away from applying to something like this until we hear more from the MEC.
89Pistons is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 11:12 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
Now knock it off with the geezer jokes or I’m going to spit my dentures at you and smack you upside the head with my rotary phone.
Empty threats.
I know you use Fixodent to keep your dentures in place.
And your phone's attached to the wall in your kitchen and the phone cord is too short to reach the family room so you can't hit me with the handset. Oldphoneworks :: Antique Phones :: Colour :: Green Collection :: 1654 - Green
Nice color.
Andy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SpecialTracking
United
158
06-21-2019 04:59 PM
HeavyLift
Cargo
391
12-20-2016 07:27 PM
P-3Bubba
Major
174
04-23-2014 07:14 AM
nw320driver
Foreign
35
10-15-2010 08:41 PM
John Pennekamp
Major
28
02-13-2007 02:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices