Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United Allegedly Kills Dog >

United Allegedly Kills Dog

Search

Notices

United Allegedly Kills Dog

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2018, 08:04 PM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 262
Default

And now we’ve sent a dog to Japan rather than its destination of Wichita......
Aviatorr is offline  
Old 03-14-2018, 08:30 PM
  #112  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 11
Default

https://www.cnbc.com/video/2018/03/14/jeff-sonnenfeld-its-time-for-munoz-to-go.html
Beeforchicken is offline  
Old 03-14-2018, 08:32 PM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 348
Default

Originally Posted by Beeforchicken
https://www.cnbc.com/video/2018/03/14/jeff-sonnenfeld-its-time-for-munoz-to-go.html
They misspelled “Kirby”
terminal is offline  
Old 03-14-2018, 09:33 PM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 182
Default

Originally Posted by terminal
They misspelled “Kirby”
I see what you did there.....

The dude mispronounced his name in the interview as well. I can't believe students at Yale pay tuition to hear that guy lecture. He didn't have one original fact or opinion.

Last edited by Slop; 03-14-2018 at 09:49 PM.
Slop is offline  
Old 03-14-2018, 09:54 PM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Upon arrival one day, a comatose dog was removed from the cargo bin, causing screams by the owner. A veterinarian happened to be nearby, and after a quick examination he asked sternly: “Did you give this dog anything before the flight”?
The owner said: “Well...um...just one of my Valium tablets.”
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 03-14-2018, 11:57 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,726
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
“A duck.”

-King Arthur
Who is this man who’s so wise in the ways of science?
Airhoss is offline  
Old 03-15-2018, 12:53 AM
  #117  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3
Default

My cat has flown on UA dozens of times as a in cabin pet(current fee $125) with the only issue, twice being allergies.

She loves to travel and when we connect through ORD or DEN she insists on riding the moving sidewalk(I rest her container on the handrail.) Often the FAs don't notice her presence. She is purr(sic) profit to UA.

DL attaches, using string, a green tag with flight info on her container. Currently, a UA CSR will sometimes staple a regular boarding pass to the handle of her container. This is very awkward as it hard to then use the handle. UA says they are going to start using yellow tags in April. I hope these tags use string.

Last edited by airman2000; 03-15-2018 at 01:10 AM. Reason: Addtional info on tags,
airman2000 is offline  
Old 03-15-2018, 04:10 AM
  #118  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: Fire Lieutenant
Posts: 50
Default

Originally Posted by PowderFinger
I predicted that several pages ago ... The Coquito Bill.


right you were.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
gdube94 is offline  
Old 03-15-2018, 05:49 AM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 774
Default

Dog could have died even if placed under the seat.

"Brachycephalic and snub-nosed animals are permanently embargoed from flying on Xyzairlines"

Straight out the FOM.
Happyflyer is offline  
Old 03-15-2018, 06:18 AM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I agree about who's on the hook. I was talking about prosecution. They can't prosecute the FA but not the pax. Probably not politically feasible for a DA to prosecute the harried mommy, so they'll have to pass on the FA too. An animal rights agitator would argue, correctly in this case, that the pax should have de-planed.

But nobody forced her to do anything. What if the FA told her to put her infant in the overhead, think she would have got off the plane then?
You are forgetting the FA was the authority figure here. Just like a cop giving you an instruction. If you don't follow it then you can be removed from the flight, and depending on how it goes prosecuted for interference with a flight crew.

49 U.S. Code § 46504 - Interference with flight crew members and attendants

An individual on an aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States who, by assaulting or intimidating a flight crew member or flight attendant of the aircraft, interferes with the performance of the duties of the member or attendant or lessens the ability of the member or attendant to perform those duties, or attempts or conspires to do such an act, shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned for not more than 20 years, or both. However, if a dangerous weapon is used in assaulting or intimidating the member or attendant, the individual shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life.

The FA was the figure here with color of authority, and once she forced he passenger to comply with her instructions, the passenger is off the hook.
FlyingKat is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Air Wisconsin
10
06-11-2020 04:16 PM
iahflyr
United
117
02-04-2018 05:52 AM
APC225
United
24
11-27-2013 06:49 AM
Golden Bear
United
16
11-30-2012 06:33 PM
Sir James
Major
0
05-08-2005 03:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices