Now United looking at CSeries & E2
03-08-2018, 09:20 AM
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 348
Don't worry STB, the we'll get 'em next time crowd will get on here and tell you how much better it will be keeping them in house. But don't worry, with our next contract we'll assuredly be flying them at 737/A320 rates very soon.
Suuuuuuuuure we will.
What imbecile negotiated these ridiculously low rates in the first place?
Suuuuuuuuure we will.
What imbecile negotiated these ridiculously low rates in the first place?
03-08-2018, 10:12 AM
#42
Need More Callouts
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
03-08-2018, 10:14 AM
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 348
03-08-2018, 10:16 AM
#44
Need More Callouts
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
As a PS, wasn't it the previous L-UAL CBA that brought the 70 seat aircraft to our regional fleet? Hmmm.....
03-08-2018, 10:24 AM
#45
Number Last
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: Boeing voice activated systems and ACARS commander
Posts: 442
If the company insists that there is a mission for the plane at United then fine, lets fly it with mainline pilots
These planes are much more comfortable that the dinky jets they will replace ... And more so than some of the guppy seats.
Scottie, if you gotta have these, fine; Mainline.
Last edited by PowderFinger; 03-08-2018 at 10:25 AM. Reason: I are not an English major
03-08-2018, 10:54 AM
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: 787 right
Posts: 504
Don't worry STB, the we'll get 'em next time crowd will get on here and tell you how much better it will be keeping them in house. But don't worry, with our next contract we'll assuredly be flying them at 737/A320 rates very soon.
Suuuuuuuuure we will.
What imbecile negotiated these ridiculously low rates in the first place?
Suuuuuuuuure we will.
What imbecile negotiated these ridiculously low rates in the first place?
03-08-2018, 12:21 PM
#47
UCH Pilot
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 787
Posts: 776
I did vote no. Was very happy with the status quo. But you know 7,600 is more than 4,700 so I both think we knew how the contract was going to turn out.
03-08-2018, 01:45 PM
#48
Need More Callouts
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
Did you go over that fact before or perhaps you enjoy being woefully underpaid?
03-08-2018, 01:46 PM
#49
Need More Callouts
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
03-08-2018, 07:20 PM
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: 787 right
Posts: 504
Your priorities are dubious. The important thing is that if United buys the C-series it doesn’t say Express on the side. We got those sub par CS-100 rates when the possibility of taking delivery of it was years away. I agree with you our pay and hiring/upgrade numbers would have looked a lot better if we had taken the 65 737-700’s but that ship has sailed. Yeah we need better rates for the C-series but I’m not going to pout and stomp my feet at the thought of us getting the C-series. I’m just going to advocate we get the rates up for them. I’d love to know what you think we should be paid to fly the CS-100 here and even the 175-E2 but that would be negotiating in public. My guess is our numbers would be about the same.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
