Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Section 6 Opening Letters >

Section 6 Opening Letters

Search

Notices

Section 6 Opening Letters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-2018, 11:59 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 133
Default

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
So how do you operate now? What a dumb thing to say.
Cranky from being up late watching hockey? 😉
Freddriver5 is offline  
Old 03-04-2018, 12:01 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pilotgolfer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 1,982
Default

Originally Posted by Freddriver5
Cranky from being up late watching hockey? 😉
Heck I’m cranky all the time. Game was fun last night...still defrosting my chestnuts, though.
pilotgolfer is offline  
Old 03-04-2018, 03:40 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,725
Default

Originally Posted by LifeNtheFstLne
They’re embedded in tonight’s MEC update. Discuss (without negotiating in public).
Looks like they want to gut TK.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 03-04-2018, 03:48 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pilotgolfer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 1,982
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
Looks like they want to gut TK.
I’m sure retirees would love your job Hoss...at half the rate, no benefits and no pesky line flying to keep their finger on the pulse of what’s going on.
pilotgolfer is offline  
Old 03-04-2018, 03:59 PM
  #45  
Recommend Retention
Thread Starter
 
LifeNtheFstLne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Bigfoot
Posts: 1,077
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
Looks like they want to gut TK.
Will be curious to see how this is rebuffed. Hard to make the business case given what AA and DAL do (and they put out a good, safe product). That being said, I think we all prefer being trained by people that may actually have to fly with us. Perhaps they could actually implement the instructor job share provisions first as a compromise. Would certainly save money and still adjust for our migrant worker style seasonal flying.
LifeNtheFstLne is offline  
Old 03-04-2018, 04:17 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,725
Default

Originally Posted by LifeNtheFstLne
Will be curious to see how this is rebuffed. Hard to make the business case given what AA and DAL do (and they put out a good, safe product). That being said, I think we all prefer being trained by people that may actually have to fly with us. Perhaps they could actually implement the instructor job share provisions first as a compromise. Would certainly save money and still adjust for our migrant worker style seasonal flying.
TK is an easy target. I'll also be interested to see how this goes down.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 03-04-2018, 06:15 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
TK is an easy target. I'll also be interested to see how this goes down.
I don't think TK is that easy of a target.

I am not an instructor, nor do I aspire to be, but I must say, I enjoy the experience there, and I feel it adds much value and safety to our product and the profession. I think our pilots would fight for TK and the instructor cadre. I will.

Another thing, by outsourcing instruction to retired pilots please keep in mind that these are not likely to be dues paying members in good-standing. I don't think it has much traction at ALPA. ALPA will want it's dues money.
baseball is offline  
Old 03-04-2018, 06:17 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer
I think “modify JV” and “own a foreign carrier” are more worrisome than RJs (since I think that Maginot Line will not be breached).

The griping on the DAL threads is often about International flying (and ergo, wide-bodies) being flown by other carriers....

There’s scope at both ends of the spectrum.
My best advice is to dig up the failed JV LOA the CAL NC tried to make the CAL MEC approve in the dark of night in the guise of "furlough mitigation." Read it over and do a risk assessment. It's a back door to scope relief. Maybe it's a front door too.
baseball is offline  
Old 03-04-2018, 06:38 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
In bankruptcy, we caved. American pilots said %^$ No to the companies "Term sheet". The judge overseeing the 1113 case agree. No pay cuts.
Two completely different financial circumstances, but point taken.
Flytolive is offline  
Old 03-04-2018, 07:04 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
untied's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 521
Default

Our big mistake is we always try to “hold the line” on scope.

Then...in negotiations...we give a little.

Our starting position should be to reduce RJ flying by 50% over the next 10 years.

Negotiate from there.
untied is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Crash
Major
3437
01-30-2013 06:51 PM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
PurpleTail
Cargo
92
03-22-2011 05:54 AM
DMEarc
Regional
1249
12-17-2010 10:37 PM
RockBottom
Major
3
09-23-2005 02:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices