Search

Notices

Proud of my company

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-2018, 10:06 AM
  #151  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
Default

Originally Posted by CALFO
I have heard this argument several times and it doesn’t add up. The police, the school, acquaintances could all say he’s nuts but unless he has made a specific, verifiable threat, he cannot be detained. Further, if he is detained, there is no “sop” in Florida that would have permitted the police or fbi to deny his constitutional right to purchase guns or to confiscate the guns he already has. This is why we need some new “sop’s”
The cops had been to his house something like 39 times. He pulled a gun on a family member. There was a documented history of violence. The FBI had investigated him and threats he made online. NONE of that information ever made it into the NICS system. Just like the Texas church shooter... it was an epic failure of multiple links in the system.

Originally Posted by Mesabah
Gun Violence Archive Keeps a database of accidental shootings in children. The AR15 is nonexistent in the data, for accident shootings below age 11. It is extremely difficult for a child to shoot themselves with a rifle, especially a properly stored AR15.
It’s extremely difficult for a kid to shoot themselves with any properly stored weapon. Your premise of using an AR for home defense supposes that weapon has to be readily available though.... proper storage doesn’t lend itself to rapid response with a long rifle.
Grumble is offline  
Old 02-27-2018, 10:06 AM
  #152  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,535
Default

Originally Posted by Bluewaffle
I’m sorry you have to cower behind a gun to feel safe
thank you for your sympathy.
tunes is offline  
Old 02-27-2018, 10:09 AM
  #153  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by worstpilotever
(And delta) for ending any affiliation the NRA. While I don't have an issue with the 2nd amendment, I do have an issue with an organization that won't even allow discussion of how try to prevent these things from happening over and over.
You're happy with this corporate decision, in spite of the fact that it's a very divisive issue. Are you going to complain when United makes a decision on a different divisive issue that you don't agree with?

Or let's go with a less societally divisive issue. Are you going to be happy if United supports a change to minimum pilot qualifications down to 250 hrs?

I've never been an NRA member but am now considering a lifetime membership.



Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
-Benjamin Franklin

Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of troops, that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States”
-Noah Webster, 1787 (one of the founding fathers)
Andy is offline  
Old 02-27-2018, 10:10 AM
  #154  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
Actually I would disagree with this 100%. A 55gr round from an AR will over penetrate and you could conceivably shoot your kid several walls away. 62gr is even worse. The old “know your target and what lies beyond” becomes crucially important. Frangible pistol rounds are optimal, then a shot gun.
9mm penetrates much farther than 223. However, overpenetration is a myth anyway. The FBI has no cases on bullets that passed through a victim, and into another victim. In all cases, it was shots that missed the target, which makes a handgun significantly more likely to miss, hitting an unintended target. If you have data that says otherwise, I'd like to see it.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 02-27-2018, 10:13 AM
  #155  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
9mm penetrates much farther than 223. However, overpenetration is a myth anyway. The FBI has no cases on bullets that passed through a victim, and into another victim. In all cases, it was shots that missed the target, which makes a handgun significantly more likely to miss, hitting an unintended target. If you have data that says otherwise, I'd like to see it.
Bullet Ballistics & Charts GunData.org

9mm has 1/4 of the kinetic energy of a .223 round.
Grumble is offline  
Old 02-27-2018, 10:13 AM
  #156  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
It’s extremely difficult for a kid to shoot themselves with any properly stored weapon. Your premise of using an AR for home defense supposes that weapon has to be readily available though.... proper storage doesn’t lend itself to rapid response with a long rifle.
The data doesn't support your conclusions at all. There were zero children who killed themselves accidentally with an AR15 in 2017.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 02-27-2018, 10:14 AM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

Originally Posted by tunes
i'm sorry that you are afraid of your own shadow
And I see we're back to Jr. High. Thanks for your scintillating and thoughtful comment.
oldmako is offline  
Old 02-27-2018, 10:46 AM
  #158  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Half wing's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: 787 right
Posts: 504
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
The data doesn't support your conclusions at all. There were zero children who killed themselves accidentally with an AR15 in 2017.
Anyone with half a brain would store their weapons safely when there are kids around so, killing themselves accidentally is not being argued here. It’s well known that for home defense a handgun is the safest gun for avoiding unintended consequences. Your knowledge in these matters was proven non-existent when you said a 9mm goes through more walls then an AR .223 round.
Half wing is offline  
Old 02-27-2018, 11:02 AM
  #159  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 348
Default

I just read the fine print of the second amendment.
It says “those who support the NRA shall also be entitled to a 5% discount, and an attack on the discount is an attack on the 2nd amendment itself”

Point being is that this is not an attack on freedom or the 2nd amendment. Everyone just needs Chill the F out.
terminal is offline  
Old 02-27-2018, 11:03 AM
  #160  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by Half wing
Anyone with half a brain would store their weapons safely when there are kids around so, killing themselves accidentally is not being argued here. It’s well known that for home defense a handgun is the safest gun for avoiding unintended consequences. Your knowledge in these matters was proven non-existent when you said a 9mm goes through more walls then an AR .223 round.
From the FBI's Dr. Roberts.
Mesabah is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
flyphisher
UPS
179
05-18-2021 12:48 PM
Crawl
CommuteAir
5406
03-21-2020 06:45 AM
SpecialTracking
United
158
06-21-2019 03:59 PM
astroglider
Major
13
05-27-2012 08:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices