New Hire Classes and Drops
#3571
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 123
Yes, I know not all mil time counts. Only up to 500 hrs when you were PIC of a multi-crew AC... blah blah, caveats yeah.
#3572
So theoretically, you could have a BI class where 10 8-F-12s need to be assigned but the bottom guy isn’t eligible, so they assign the bottom 2-11 guys CA slots & the ineligible 8-ball gets an FO seat. I should say I don’t know for a fact that’s happening & I haven’t really seen any communications from the company or union updating us on the matter, but my reading of the contract doesn’t bind the company in the way you’re claiming.
#3573
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2020
Posts: 291
As others have said, this is completely false. The most junior did not qualify therefore they were not able to bid for it. MANY of those with CA slots in the bottom 10 did not want it. Source - I know someone in that class.
#3574
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,164
So this is clear evidence United is forcing upgrades to new hires. All I have to say is LOL.
#3575
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2022
Posts: 856
Even if it did work that way ... all the company has to do is segregate the non-eligible people into their own classes.
#3576
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,525
I don’t believe this is true. Yes, BI assignments are seniority based, but not everyone is eligible for a CA award, & I don’t see anything in the contract that states they can only assign 8-F-12 CAs if the eligible pilots are also the most junior in class.
So theoretically, you could have a BI class where 10 8-F-12s need to be assigned but the bottom guy isn’t eligible, so they assign the bottom 2-11 guys CA slots & the ineligible 8-ball gets an FO seat. I should say I don’t know for a fact that’s happening & I haven’t really seen any communications from the company or union updating us on the matter, but my reading of the contract doesn’t bind the company in the way you’re claiming.
So theoretically, you could have a BI class where 10 8-F-12s need to be assigned but the bottom guy isn’t eligible, so they assign the bottom 2-11 guys CA slots & the ineligible 8-ball gets an FO seat. I should say I don’t know for a fact that’s happening & I haven’t really seen any communications from the company or union updating us on the matter, but my reading of the contract doesn’t bind the company in the way you’re claiming.
#3577
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2020
Posts: 291
I have no idea where you are getting your information, but this is completely wrong. Talk to anyone in the last few classes. Happened a few weeks ago as well...down to the final 3 people with 2x 737 CA and 1x 320 FO....the 3rd from bottom wanted 320FO but ended up with 737CA because the 8 ball wasn't eligible for a CA slot
#3578
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,525
I have no idea where you are getting your information, but this is completely wrong. Talk to anyone in the last few classes. Happened a few weeks ago as well...down to the final 3 people with 2x 737 CA and 1x 320 FO....the 3rd from bottom wanted 320FO but ended up with 737CA because the 8 ball wasn't eligible for a CA slot
#3579
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 772
sorry thumbsup, I don’t believe you are correct, then again I don’t have anything definitive to prove it. It sounds like you do though. Could you point us in the correct direction of this publication? Or quote it from somewhere?
#3580
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 536
I have no idea where you are getting your information, but this is completely wrong. Talk to anyone in the last few classes. Happened a few weeks ago as well...down to the final 3 people with 2x 737 CA and 1x 320 FO....the 3rd from bottom wanted 320FO but ended up with 737CA because the 8 ball wasn't eligible for a CA slot
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post